Very important updates regarding SARS-CoV-2/COVID 19 virus

I've been collecting news stories and studies about the SARS-CoV-2/COVID 19 virus for months (see here) and fairly early on i began to realize that the virus was far less dangerous than the media was reporting, which led to the question of why many governments were handling the situation in a most draconian fashion. Now, nearly 7 months later, i'm beginning to question whether there is a new virus at all since, prior to the lockdowns and the deaths directly attributed to them, it seems to be difficult to find any excess deaths as a result of a new virus in the official numbers.

Furthermore, there has been evidence from multiple scientific sources that no one has properly isolated this virus. One of these sources is the CDC itself which stated in a recent document that "no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available" (see pg. 40 here). This doesn't necessarily mean there isn't a new coronavirus, but it does mean that it cannot be labeled as SARS-CoV-2 if it hasn't been properly isolated.

Complicating matters further is the fact that the rt-PCR "test" which is being widely used in labs to confirm infection, does not appear to be a test at all, but rather a procedure for amplifying a tiny amount of RNA or DNA for further processing. Equally alarming is that rt-PCR may be detecting any coronavirus, meaning that a "positive" result (PCR doesn't actually produce a binary result) is possible for anyone that has ever had the common cold.

Recent and very important updates further reinforce that this "pandemic" is actually a political tool.

COVID: The Virus That Isn't There: The Root Fraud Exposed « Jon Rappoport's Blog

The CDC document is titled, "CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel." It is dated July 13, 2020.

Buried deep in the document, on page 39, in a section titled, "Performance Characteristics," we have this: "Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…"

The key phrase there is: "Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…"

Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term "quantified" in that phrase means: the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.

12bytes says: Here is the paper on archive.org: CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019 N Co V) Real Time RT PCR Diagnostic Panel (EUA CDC Panel Ifu)

16000 Doctors & Scientists Sign Declaration Strongly Opposing a 2nd COVID Lockdown – Collective Evolution

Approximately 16,000 doctors have come together opposing lockdown measures in various countries, as well as the possibility of a second lockdown that multiple governments are currently considering. They believe lockdown measures are not only completely unnecessary, but also have a devastating impact on physical and mental health as well as society.

Many of these signees are some of the world's top doctors and scientists, and they've been speaking out against lockdown measures since they first began months ago. One of them is Michael Levitt, a Biophysicist and a professor of structural biology at Stanford University, who has criticized the World Health Organization (WHO) as well as Facebook for censoring different information and informed perspectives regarding the Coronavirus. According to him, "the level of stupidity going on here is amazing."

[...]

"Implementation of the current draconian measures that are so extremely restrict fundamental rights can only be justified if there is reason to fear that a truly, exceptionally dangerous virus is threatening us. Do any scientifically sound data exist to support this contention for COVID-19? I assert that the answer is simply, no" – Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, a specialist in microbiology and one of the most cited research scientists in German history

The World Responds: Great Barrington Declaration Gets 135,000 Signatures In 4 Days

In the course of just 4 days since release, 4,700 medical and public health scientists, 8,838 medical Practitioners and 123,298 members of the general public have signed The Great Barrington Declaration.

[...]

"Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice."

The Trouble With PCR Tests – Swiss Policy Research

Already in mid-March, SPR explained that the highly sensitive PCR tests are prone to producing false-positive results and their individual predictive value may easily drop below 50%.

The issues with PCR tests are numerous:

  1. There can be large-scale test kit contamination, as both the US and the UK (and several African countries) discovered during the early phase of the pandemic.

  2. There can be testing site or lab contamination, which has led to countless false positive results, school closures, nursing home quarantines, canceled sports events, and more.

  3. The PCR test can react to other coronaviruses. According to lab examinations, this happens in about 1 to 3% of cases if only one target gene is tested, as is the case in many (but not all) labs and as the WHO itself has recommended to avoid ambiguous positive/negative test results.

  4. The PCR test can detect non-infectious virus fragments weeks after an active infection, or from an infection of a contact person, as the US CDC confirmed.

  5. The PCR test can detect viable virus in quantities too small to be infectious (see below).

Video: "Contact Tracing", A Certified Contact Tracer Exposes the Truth - Global Research

The concept of contact tracing with government-trained recruits for the sake of tracking Covid-19 cases will lead to the violation of your privacy when it comes to your health concerns. The US government, the Clinton Foundation and several states are actively creating an army of contact tracers, so in a sense, Obama's call for a civilian force is becoming a reality.

But there is good news, not everyone is on board with such an invasive idea. According to an article published back in May by Technology Review on US attitudes towards government intrusion on privacy especially when it comes to their health, "In a Twitter thread earlier this week, Keith Humphreys, a professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford, argued that public health officials are underestimating how much US attitudes toward government authority could undermine national testing and tracing programs." The article describes how ordinary Americans defy Covid-19 lockdowns when it comes to facemasks, stay-at-home restrictions and social distancing rules that were put in place.

Here is a video by a California woman who got certified as a contact tracer explains in detail what they actually do:

Virologist: SARS-CoV-2 Is An Unrestricted Bioweapon

This scientific report is co-authored by virologist Li-Meng Yan who recently announced that the SARS-CoV-2 was man-made and intentionally weaponized in a Chinese bio-lab. As retribution, Yan's mother has been arrested in China.

It is important to go to the original source and download the report, since China is pulling every string in its toolbox, including kidnapping, to delete the report.

12bytes says: Here is the report: SARS-CoV-2 Is an Unrestricted Bioweapon: A Truth Revealed through Uncovering a Large-Scale, Organized Scientific Fraud - Li-Meng Yan (MD, PhD), Shu Kang (PhD), Jie Guan (PhD), Shanchang Hu (PhD)

Here is the abstract section of the report:

Two possibilities should be considered for the origin of SARS-CoV-2: natural evolution or laboratory creation. In our earlier report titled “Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route”, we disproved the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 arising naturally through evolution and instead proved that SARS-CoV-2 must have been a product of laboratory modification. Despite this and similar efforts, the laboratory creation theory continues to be downplayed or even diminished. This is fundamentally because the natural origin theory remains supported by several novel coronaviruses published after the start of the outbreak. These viruses (the RaTG13 bat coronavirus, a series of pangolin coronaviruses, and the RmYN02 bat coronavirus) reportedly share high sequence homology with SARS-CoV-2 and have altogether constructed a seemingly plausible pathway for the natural evolution of SARS-CoV-2. Here, however, we use in-depth analyses of the available data and literature to prove that these novel animal coronaviruses do not exist in nature and their sequences have been fabricated. In addition, we also offer our insights on the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 may have originated naturally from a coronavirus that infected the Mojiang miners.

Revelation of these virus fabrications renders the natural origin theory unfounded. It also strengthens our earlier assertion that SARS-CoV-2 is a product of laboratory modification, which can be created in approximately six months using a template virus owned by a laboratory of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). The fact that data fabrications were used to cover up the true origin of SARS-CoV-2 further implicates that the laboratory modification here is beyond simple gain-of-function research.

The scale and the coordinated nature of this scientific fraud signifies the degree of corruption in the fields of academic research and public health. As a result of such corruption, damages have been made both to the reputation of the scientific community and to the well-being of the global community.

Importantly, while SARS-CoV-2 meets the criteria of a bioweapon specified by the PLA, its impact is well beyond what is conceived fora typical bioweapon. In addition, records indicate that the unleashing of this weaponized pathogen should have been intentional rather than accidental. We therefore define SARS-CoV-2 as an Unrestricted Bioweapon and the current pandemic a result of Unrestricted Biowarfare. We further suggest that investigations should be carried out on the suspected government and individuals and the responsible ones be held accountable for this brutal attack on the global community.

WHO (Accidentally) Confirms Covid is No More Dangerous Than Flu – OffGuardian

The World Health Organization has finally confirmed what we (and many experts and studies) have been saying for months – the coronavirus is no more deadly or dangerous than seasonal flu.

The WHO's top brass made this announcement during a special session of the WHO's 34-member executive board on Monday October 5th, it's just nobody seemed to really understand it.

In fact, they didn't seem to completely understand it themselves.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *