Thunderbird, IMAP and a global inbox?

One of the things that nags me with Thunderbird is that there is no easy way to achieve a proper global inbox if you have multiple IMAP accounts. If you use the POP protocol, no problem, but IMAP is another story. One common "solution" is View -> Folders -> Unified and i think the result sucks because it just makes more of a mess of how mail folders are displayed, especially when you have multiple IMAP accounts.

While i think a true unified inbox for IMAP accounts may be in the Thunderbird pipeline, you can achieve something reasonably close with a simple message filter in the interim. Why i didn't realize this sooner, i don't know, because i've been fighting with this for quite a while.

Go to 'Tools' -> 'Message Filters' and select your first IMAP account. Create a new filter and give it a name, then select to run it when getting new mail and after junk filtering. Make sure to select the 'Match all messages' option and then in the actions area, set it up to 'Move message to' and 'Inbox on Local Folders'. Done. Do the same with the rest of your accounts.

Now when you collapse the IMAP accounts in the folder view pane, Thunderbird will just display the names of the accounts followed by the normal Local Folders tree without all the extra garbage.

Thunderbird unified IMAP

Anything else you want to move to the Local Folders tree, such as Drafts, etc., you can do from the account settings.

Manjaro takes 1st place on Distrowatch

Yeah yeah, i'm late to the party, but i just now figured out that Manjaro Linux has captured the number one spot on Distrowatch, displacing Linux Mint. This happened some time within the last few months apparently.

If you're new to Linux, or want to remove the Windows virus, read on, else this could be about as interesting watching ice melt.

I find Manjaro's move to top dog status interesting considering it's based on Arch Linux which is notorious for being one of the more difficult flavors of Linux to install, configure and use. Manjaro however is specifically designed to be an easy-to-use Arch, complete with a capable graphical installer, package manager and software.

I started with Linux Mint a few years ago and i recommend it to anyone wanting to free themselves from the death grip of Microsoft. It's simple to install, feature rich and is probably one of the most polished and easiest to use distributions for newcomers. I became a bit frustrated with it because it's a 'point' release, meaning you have to re-install it when a new version hits the streets which, as i recall, was about every six months. Plus it's based on the LTS (long term support) version of Ubuntu which, in turn, is based on Debian. What that means is that the software in the Mint repository is often kinda old, forcing many to seek out lots of 'untrusted' PPAs, or figure out how to compile packages from source code.

Manjaro, on the other hand, is a rolling release, same as Arch, meaning you install it once and keep applying updates for ever more, in theory. Manjaro has it's own repository of considerable size, but one can also enable the AUR (Arch User Repository) which is also quite large (and can also get you in quite a bit of trouble).

Arch is pretty cutting edge and updates come fast and hard and can sometimes break the system. Manjaro receives a lot of updates too, many of which are quite large and affect somewhere around 100 packages at a shot, but the nice folks that work on the project alleviate some of the scariness by kicking the tires before turning packages loose.

I don't know that Manjaro is suitable for beginners, but it is definitely an attractive distribution. I've been using it for a few months and so far haven't had any major problems. If you're new to Linux and want to try it, just be sure to keep your data safe and learn first how to recover a busted system in the event something does explode, as has happened in the past.

Video: The Real Manchurian Candidate

From the video description:

Was Sirhan Sirhan hypnotically programmed to assassinate Bobby Kennedy? For the last eleven years, Dr. Daniel Brown, a leading expert on hypnosis and coercive persuasion at Harvard Medical School, and Sirhan's attorney Laurie Dusek, have spent over 150 hours with Sirhan, trying to recover his memory of the shooting. These sessions have produced some extraordinary new evidence of the "range mode" programming allegedly used to set up Sirhan as the lone assassin. On the 50th anniversary of the assassination, you can now watch Brown and Dusek discuss these new discoveries for the first time.