"Independent fact-checkers" – i.e., third party companies contracted by Facebook, Twitter, Google and others to, all too often arbitrarily decide what is true and what is false, are at it again – this time taking on two Oxford scientists.
Their article about a study looking at the effectiveness (or lack thereof) of face masks when worn to prevent coronavirus infection, originally published in The Spectator, the world's oldest weekly magazine, and shared on Facebook, got flagged as "false information."
This happened to the consternation of its authors, one of them being Professor Carl Heneghan, who posted about the incident on Twitter where he has some 70,000 followers.
Heneghan said that no information contained in the article was false, indicating that he is aware a similar sort of censorship is happening to other Facebook users, and wondering, "What has happened to academic freedom and freedom of speech?"
Since Dominion and Smartmatic have control of the voting machines, the software, and the reporting of the results, it should be up to the owners and officials of those two entities to explain how it was done. But it was done, as will be shown.
Unraveling this mystery begins with The New York Times. After polls closed on Election Day, The Times begin to report the results hour after hour. The coding for that data is still online, and we have downloaded it in case it is taken down.
The data from The Times shows the time, expressed as UTC, or Universal time, which is Greenwich mean time in England.
It also shows the totals for Trump and Biden, Trump's lead, and then new votes for Trump and Biden as each change in the results was uploaded. Then it shows something very significant: The increase or decease in the lead for Trump after the new dump of votes occurred. Therein lies this story.
Late on Wednesday, Nov. 4, at precisely 16:35 UTC, The New York Times reported President Trump was leading in Georgia by 103,997 votes. However, a new group of votes was being dumped. That one dump reduced Trump's lead by 18,563 votes. Remember than number.
Three hours later, another dump occurred. This one reduced Trump's lead by 4,656 votes. Remember that number. Thirty minutes later, another dump reduced Trump's lead by 4,685 votes. An hour and a half later, another dump reduced Trump's lead by 9,323 votes. An hour and a half later, another dump reduced Trump's lead by 9,509 votes.
Are you beginning to see a pattern?
The pattern is that all the dumps were multiples of 4,800.
But it didn't end there!
Government responses to COVID 19 are often said to be "led by science." However what we are seeing is the widespread censorship of science to support a narrative. It seems anything that challenges the orthodox view is ignored, banned or undermined. While this persists no government can claim their polices are "led by science."
We contrast the statement about COVID 19 of four eminently qualified scientists. Dr Mike Yeadon, Sir Patrick Vallance, Chris Witty and Dr. Roger Hodkinson. All four should be heard but only two are. While Patrick Vallance and Chris Witty given the maximum public exposure Dr's Yeadon and Hodkinson are almost completely ignored by the politicians and the mainstream media and heavily censored on social media.
via The Highwire: HighWire goes to a place we've never gone before. Is there something more behind the global coronavirus response? Why are so many leaders using the same language when talking about the future of their countries and the world? What is the Great Reset? Journalist James Corbett joins Del to separate facts from fiction.
In the first half I prove that "Build Back Better" & The Great Reset is one fascist plan for total control of the world. I show you exactly where it comes from. Next, I get into why people who know about it are fighting against it. Finally I end with some hope!! We're going to beat these people, but first we have to cut through the media lies.
World Economic Forum Build Back Better: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/07/to-build-back-better-we-must-reinvent-capitalism-heres-how/
WEF 2016: I own nothing, have no privacy: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/how-life-could-change-2030/
Internet of Nanothings slide show: https://futurecomresearch.eu/previous/2017/site_pres/K/IAN_Akyildiz.pdf
FIAN: UN + WEF agreement: https://www.fian.org/en/press-release/article/wef-takeover-of-un-strongly-condemned-2273
Open Letter re UN / WEF partnership: https://www.cognitoforms.com/MultistakeholderismActionGroup/CorporateCaptureOfGlobalGovernanceTheWorldEconomicForumWEFUNPartnershipAgreementIsADangerousThreatToUN?fbclid=IwAR0jaqd3fdz2Nl3ndlSl-fbR1mlMwMESKTDX5SlwtN-kwY3eLfQAFq71ujM
Build Back Better Media edition: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Building_Back_Better_2020.pdf
WinterOak Great Fascist Reset: https://winteroak.org.uk/2020/10/05/klaus-schwab-and-his-great-fascist-reset/
In Wayne County two Republican members of the county's Board of Canvassers, Monica Palmer and William Hartmann, initially refused to certify the results of the obviously fraud-ridden election. Wayne County, by the way, includes the city of Detroit which has been continuously controlled by corrupt Democrats since 1962. Not surprisingly, Detroit has been known to suffer from election irregularities for many years. In this election, among other concerns, around 70 percent of Wayne County precincts were found to be "out of balance," which means that the number of ballots cast did not match the number of people who signed in to vote.
The refusal to certify this vote with its glaring irregularities made the two honest officials an immediate target of intimidation and blackmail. Within minutes of their decision, death threats began pouring in. "The [death] threats have been made against myself, my daughter and my husband," Monica Palmer told Detroit Free Press. The threats that Monica Palmer referred to in this statement were conveyed to her privately. But there was more to come publicly so that the whole world could see just how brazen and vicious the American political left is.
In The Transgender Industrial-Complex, a copy of which was provided to National Justice for review, author Scott Howard provides over 400 pages of mostly unknown names and groups who, largely over the last 20 years, have used their money to fund phony science, corrupt law, judges and politicians, disseminate disinformation, and organize often thuggish and violent activism to force mostly English-speaking liberal democracies to seriously debate whether men can get pregnant or children should be allowed to choose to take drugs and have irreversible "gender affirmation surgeries."
Those who disagree on the grounds of ethics or science are marked for destruction.
Howard's book is effective because its chapters focus on tracing the money, examining the history, and looks at how the European Union and Washington export transgenderism to other nations. It effectively packages the actual science on transgenderism, that it is nothing more than organized and well-funded delirium, in a highly readable format.
The history of transgenderism as we know it is believed to have originated in Jewish circles in early 20th century Germany, but Howard's research shows that references to breaking down gender in Jewish circles go back to the 14th century, almost hundreds of years years before Martha Baer, a B'nai B'rith member in Germany, became the world's first "sex-change" operation recipient.
There are two widely held climate-change beliefs that are simply not accurate. The first is that there has been a statistically significant warming trend in the U.S. over the last 20 years. The second is that average ocean levels are rising alarmingly due to man-made global warming. Neither of these perspectives is true; yet both remain important, nonetheless, since both are loaded with very expensive public policy implications.
To refute the first view, we turn to data generated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for the relevant years under discussion. The table below reports the average mean temperature in the continental U.S. for the years 1998 through 2019*:
1998 54.6 degrees
1999 54.5 degrees
2000 54.0 degrees
[...] 2017 54.6 degrees
2018 53.5 degrees
2019 52.7 degrees
The mainstream reported "hundreds" of protesters, but as pictures plainly show it was more like tens of thousands.
Below is a library catalog with direct links to Corey's Digs investigative reports and videos that break the reports into categories, as well as fantastic resources and tools for researching and fact checking! This catalog is updated twice a year and is available in pdf downloaded for free in The Bookshop, where dozens of investigative reports are also available for download.