I watched Robinson's 'Route 91: Uncovering the Cover Up of The Vegas Mass Shooting' documentary soon after release, but i just now got around to commenting on it.
In the video, Robinson claims to have proven beyond doubt that multiple shooters were targeting people in the concert venue. The video is a mix of truth, fiction and wild speculation. The conclusion Robinson draws regarding multiple shooters contradicts my own investigation which was a forensic investigation of the video, audio ballistics and location data.
I cannot explain the major discrepancy in our findings, nor have i found any evidence whatsoever of anyone firing a weapon anywhere other than at or near the north wing of Mandalay Bay. There are 3 distinctly different sounds of gunfire and each is perfectly explainable: 1) Paddock targeting the airport fuel tank from room 134, 2) Paddock targeting the venue from room 135 and 3), Paddock shooting down the hallway through his hotel room door from room 135. The differences in sound were captured very clearly in the 'taxi video' and many people, including Robinson, mistake this as being from multiple gunmen. The woman taxi driver was parked below Paddock's room and she even remarked at one point that the gunfire sounded like it was coming from further away when, in fact, Paddock had simply changed positions and targets.
The most annoying part of all this was dealing with Robinson. Because i found some of her evidence to support multiple shooters convincing, i tried to open a conversation with her in order to discuss our thoughts, but she had no intention of considering any evidence, forensic or otherwise, which contradicted her own. I found this to be very odd behavior for an "investigative journalist".
See the Post analysis updates section of my article, Las Vegas Shooting 1-Oct-2017 - An acoustic analysis and personal observations.