Coronavirus information & resources
Treating effects of COVID-19 vax
Vaccines - What You Need To Know

The Mozilla Monster

The Mozilla Monster – 12Bytes.org

The Mozilla Foundation rakes in hundreds of millions of dollars annually, the vast majority of which is generated as a result of their partnerships with various ethically challenged and proprietary search engine companies such as Google, Yahoo, and others (see Firefox Search Engine Cautions, Recommendations).

Other nefarious Mozilla partners currently, or have included in the past, Microsoft, Telefónica, LG Electronics, Sony, Verizon, Cisco, Cloudflare, the Omidyar Network, the Ford Foundation, a funder of domestic terrorist groups, and the Open Society Foundation run by George Soros which is another funder of domestic terrorist groups. These kinds of partnerships could hardly be more at odds with statements Mozilla has made in its manifesto, including "Committed to you, your privacy and an open Web" and the current "Mozilla puts people before profit". Mozilla claims to be a privacy and free speech advocate while simultaneously cultivating relationships with a laundry list of corporations, networks and foundations which zero regard for privacy or freedom.

more...

Firefox - Blog posts of interest

Ouch: Firefox security

Firefox and Chromium | Madaidan's Insecurities

12bytes: Note that Firefox sandboxing was strengthened in version 99.

Firefox is sometimes recommended as a supposedly more secure browser because of its parent company's privacy practices. This article explains why this notion is not true and enumerates a number of security weaknesses in Firefox's security model when compared to Chromium. In particular, it covers the less granular process model, weaker sandboxing and lack of modern exploit mitigations. It is important to decouple privacy from security — this article does not attempt to compare the privacy practices of each browser but rather their resistance to exploitation.

12bytes: I don't think there's much of an argument regarding privacy. Google loses, plain and simple, and it is my understanding that no amount of Google Chrome (or Chromium) tweaking can circumvent some of the risks in the privacy department. The security problems are worrying however, especially for us Linux users, though it must be considered that the exploits mentioned seem to depend on having JavaScript enabled globally which is perhaps the biggest no-no both privacy and security wise, regardless of what browser one chooses. It is also unknown how browser configuration may play into the exploits mentioned in the article. For example, does enabling network partitioning/dFPI mitigate any of this?

I tend to doubt the situation with browser development concerning security, regardless of the brand, will get any better. I think the problem here is the web itself and the pace at which it is developing, or devolving, depending on your POV. Things were so much simpler in the days of HTML and CSS, however Big Tech, being the collection of ethic-less woke idiots it is at the upper levels, has bloated the web with often unneeded and unwanted technologies and JavaScript and 3rd party fonts and dependencies on Content Delivery Networks and libraries and frameworks and the problem keeps getting bigger and bigger. Many of us see the problem of turning the web into a collection of trendy so-called "apps", but corporations simply don't care and the web developers that work for them seem to be largely poorly educated cookie cut-outs with a degree and a lust for shiny things.

Certainly there needs to be more real competition in the browser market beyond configuration files and forks but the problem, because of what the web has become, is that a web browser has to deal with whatever garbage is thrown at it and this requires a massively complex beast with 10's of millions of lines of code, much of it potentially exploitable. I don't think such an undertaking is doable with a small team, hence why i do not recommend Waterfox, Pale Moon, etc.. As such i think it's entirely possible that all future browsers will be delivered by large corporations which, like Mozilla, don't seem to give much of a crap about privacy at the corporate level. While the story is perhaps significantly different at the developer level, for now, i think we can all see a potential train wreck at the end of the tunnel.

As for me, i'm willing to roll the dice and stick with Firefox (and the 'arkenfox' user.js and my custom tweaks) for the time being, regardless of my disdain for the woke clowns which have infected Mozilla.

more...

Ghacks: uBlock Origin is now the most popular Firefox add-on

uBlock Origin is now the most popular Firefox add-on - gHacks Tech News

The Firefox version of uBlock Origin is considered the version that offers the best protection, as it supports protection against CNAME tracking, which the Chrome versions do not offer.

Hill calls uBlock Origin a "wide-spectrum content blocker" instead of an ad blocker. The extension blocks more advertisement but also trackers, miners, popups, malicious URLs and more by default. Users may add more lists, for instance to deal with annoyances on the Internet.

Many users hold uBlock Origin in high regard because of its memory and CPU effectiveness. Hill, who never accepted donations or compensation for his development work, is another core reason why the extension is as popular as it is right now.

more...

Another point in Firefox's favor

I tend to beat the hell out of Mozilla and then recommend their web browser, Firefox, because it's still better suited to privacy enhancements than any other mainstream browser in my opinion.

This is old news (2019), but i just became aware of it...

Major Browsers to Prevent Disabling of Click Tracking Privacy Risk

Of all the browsers I tested, only Brave and Firefox currently disable it by default and do not appear to have any plans on enabling it in the future.

Click-tracking is controlled in Firefox with the browser.send_pings preference and, as of v97, it is still disabled by default.

On one hand i'm glad that Firefox's market share continues to plummet because it puts a dent in the piggy banks of the corporate clowns at Mozilla, but on the other i'm glad it's still around. How much longer it will remain so, i don't know. Perhaps quite a long time should the "woke", inclusive jackasses at the corporate level ever decide to return to their earthly senses.