12bytes Mumble meet every Sat. night!
Coronavirus information & resources
Vaccines - What You Need To Know

The Jewish Holocaust Quiz

Take the Holocaust Quiz and learn how much you really know about the Jewish holocaust of World War II.

One of the most misunderstood historical events, the Jewish holocaust of World War II is a fascinating and complex subject, as well as a political hot potato.

How much do you really know about the holocaust?

Approximately six million Jews were systematically exterminated in German controlled concentration camps throughout Europe during World War II.

Answer 1

"I was in the big concentration camps in Germany. I must truthfully state that in no camp have I ever seen anything that might have resembled gas chambers." -- Dr. Benedikt Kautsky, Austrian Social Democrat and Jewish prisoner of various concentration camps from 1938-1945, including three years in Auschwitz, quoted in Auschwitz -- A Personal Account, p. 4

The six million figure is a Jewish symbolic figure which originated decades before the start of the Second World War in 1939. This figure is no longer supported by any creditable historian.

It had once been claimed that approximately four million people were put to death "at the hands of the Nazi murders" at Auschwitz alone. Polish historians have since reduced this figure to approximately one million and this includes all deaths from all causes, including Typhus. Similarly, death tolls were drastically lowered for several other camps as well.

Though the actual number of Jews who perished in concentration camps is difficult to estimate, it is clearly a tiny fraction of the six million figure and there is relevant evidence to suggest it is less than one million. It must also be considered that Jews who died in areas controlled by the Germans, regardless of the cause, were often listed as victims of the holocaust.

Despite the official reductions in the numbers of dead, the erroneous six million figure is still promoted by the mainstream media and other influential institutions. Even Wikipedia still uses it.

Soap Made From Fat of Dead Jews

The Nazis used fat from the bodies dead Jews to manufacture soap and tattooed skin to make lampshades.

Answer 2

Human fat never used by Nazis

"It’s a general conception that the Nazis manufactured soap," says [Michael] Berenbaum [author of The World Must Know: The History of the Holocaust as Told in the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum], who was project manager for the USHMM before it opened in 1993 and headed the museum’s research institute until 1997. "But those of us working in this area have not used it as an example [of Nazi atrocity] in the last 10 to 15 years. We don’t have any evidence that the Nazis actually manufactured soap with human bodies."

Ilse Koch Trial
Article about the Ilse Koch trial (click to enlarge)

Outlandish and malicious claims of shrunken heads, lampshades made from human skin, Jews being locked in cages with an eagle and a bear, soap made from human fat, Nazi soldiers tearing babies in half, as well as a plethora of others, have been so thoroughly debunked that they are no longer supported by any serious historian, yet many are still regurgitated by mainstream institutions, including the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Nevertheless claims such as these, as well as confessions produced through the application of torture, were used to convict the German "war criminals" during the Nuremberg and Dachau tribunals.

The human soap fallacy first appeared during the First World War and was debunked then as well. No human skin lampshade has ever been found and the lampshade alleged to have been made from human skin which was discovered in the home of Ilse Koch at Buchenwald was proven to have been made from animal skin, which comes as no surprise given there was a factory near the camp that produced lampshades from animal skins.

The shrunken heads of Jews that were displayed for all the world to see as part of a U.S.military psychological warfare operation vanished when the Nuremberg Tribunals began, along with other alleged evidence which was used to turn public opinion against Germany.

Which of the following images are forgeries? (click an image to enlarge it)

Famous Buchenwald barracks photograph
1. - Famous Buchenwald barracks photograph.

Nazi hanging woman from tank barrel
2. - Nazi hanging woman from tank barrel.

Nazi hanging bare-breasted woman
3. - Nazi hanging bare-breasted woman.

Nazis shooting women in field
4. - Nazis shooting women in field.

Nazis hang Jewish woman
5. Nazis hang Jewish woman.

Nazi's hang female medical personnel
6. - Nazi's hang female medical personnel.

Hitler standing among holocaust victims
7. - Hitler stands among holocaust victims.

Answer 3

All of the above images are forgeries. As part of the propaganda campaign to demonize the German people, the Soviets and others forged many photographs which are still used to represent the holocaust today. (click an image to enlarge it)

Famous Buchenwald Missing Man Forgery
The odd appearance of the man leaning against the pole, especially where his shoulder meets the pole, as well as the fading left edge of his left arm, are dead giveaways of this prolific forgery.
Original Buchenwald barrack photograph
The original Buchenwald barrack photograph was published in the May 6th, 1945 edition of The New York Times Magazine.

Forged Nazi tank hanging
This forgery is relatively well done except that the angle of the light striking the women is substantially different than the angle of the light in the rest of the photograph. The photograph was captured near high-noon, but hers was captured a few hours earlier or later. This is apparent in her ground shadow and the lack of any shadow on the step her figure was placed on. One may also wonder why she is posing for the camera if she's about to be hung.
Forged History: Nazi tank hanging original
The original photograph used to create the "Nazi tank hanging" forgery.

Forged Nazi bare-breasted women hanging
Besides the odd appearance of the woman, the straight edge along her right arm and the soldiers abnormally long left arm and large hand give away this obvious forgery.

Original Nazi bare-breasted women hanging
The Original photograph is far less dramatic.

Forged Nazi field execution
This forgery is blatantly obvious for several reasons: 1) the stock of the machine gun is completely missing between the left arm and left leg of the girl on the left. 2) the horizon and grassy areas where the solider was in the original is an exact clone of an area slightly to the left.

Original Nazi field execution
Look closely at the forgery and the original and compare the horizon and grassy areas above the rock.

Forged Nazi hanging with geese
Another obvious forgery, the two men are not looking at each other because the angles were changed when they were moved apart (the man on the left appears to be looking behind the one on the right). Also the the images of the soldiers and the woman were taken at different times of the day and the contrast is different.

Original Nazi hanging with geese
In the original it is clear the soldiers are looking directly at one another.

Forged Nazi hanging female medical soldier
Besides the very unnatural appearance of the woman, the man standing in the center of the original photograph was not completely removed by the forger; the left (his left) bottom part of his overcoat is still visible. Also the rope the woman appears to be hanging from is actually a pole in the distant background.

Original Nazi hanging female medical soldier
In the original it is clear that the "rope" used to hang the women in the forgery is actually a pole, perhaps a utility pole.

Forged Hitler standing among holocaust victims
An obvious forgery when compared to the original source image of Hitler.

Original Hitler standing among holocaust victims
The original appeared as a magazine cover.

Jews declared war on Germany.

Answer 4

Judea Declares War on GermanyProminent Jews called for an international boycott of German businesses on March 24, 1933, six years before the outbreak of World War II. This pronouncement was followed by Hitler eight days later when he ordered a boycott of all Jewish owned business in Germany. Hitler collaborated with Zionist officials that same year to create the Transfer Agreement as part of a peaceful effort to encourage Jews to migrate to Palestine along with their asserts. Although the Zionists needed Germany's Jews to populate Palestine, they also realized the value of their persecution which would later be used to solicit reparations.

"When they asked me, couldn't you give money out of the United Jewish Appeal funds for the rescue of Jews in Europe, I said, 'NO!' and I say again 'NO!' ... one should resist this wave which pushes the Zionist activities to secondary importance." -- Yitzhak Greenbaum, Chairman of the Rescue Committee of the Jewish Agency, addressing the Zionist Executive Council in Tel Aviv, Feb. 18, 1943

The evidence conclusively proves that homicidal gas chambers were used to exterminate Jews.

Answer 5

TORONTO - Zundel - No scientific proof Jews exterminated

Gas chamber sign at Dachau shower room
Sign at the Dachau shower room stating that it was a gas chamber disguised as a shower and never used as a gas chamber

Evidence collected by scientists, engineers, historians, scholars and others, a number of which are Jewish, strongly support the conclusion that the facilities alleged to have been homicidal gas chambers could not possibly have been used to exterminate human beings for a number of fundamental reasons, including the lack of hermetically sealed enclosures and explosion-proof electrical fixtures (hydrogen cyanide is an explosive gas), the absence of any significant trace of hydrogen cyanide in test samples, the absence of blue staining from repeated exposure to hydrogen cyanide gas, the absence of equipment to introduce, heat, circulate and exhaust the deadly gas from the enclosures, the presence of unbarred, breakable glass windows and the use of flimsy household doors, some of which opened inward which would have made it impossible to open them after the victims collapsed against them, and many others.

Curiously, the sign at the prisoner shower room at Dachau states that the room was a gas chamber disguised as a shower room, but never used as a gas chamber. In fact, the shower room was altered after the war to resemble a gas chamber for visiting government officials from the United States who would later use this forged evidence to convict the Germans at the Nuremberg and Dachau Tribunals.

The following image shows the alleged homicidal gas chamber that is shown to tourists at the Auschwitz main camp (Auschwitz I). The lack of blue staining, as well as other factors, provide clear evidence that this room was never exposed to large quantities of hydrogen cyanide gas. In fact, this former air-raid shelter and morgue was reconstructed after the war by the Soviets who added four crude holes in the roof from where we are told the Zyklon B pellets were deposited. Dr. Franciszek Piper, former chair of the Historical Department at the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum, admitted as much during an interview conducted by David Cole, a historical revisionist who was later physically attacked and had his life threatened by the Jewish Defense League (JDL) for revealing such inconvenient facts.

Auschwitz gas chamber

Below is gas a chamber at Auschwitz-Birkenau (Auschwitz II) which is known to have been used for non-homicidal purposes (disinfection of bedding, clothing, etc.). Notice the prominent blue staining as a result of repeated exposure to hydrogen cyanide. This blue residue is so penetrating and permanent that it is still visible on the exterior surface of the walls of some of these enclosures, even after approximately eight decades of exposure to the elements.

Birkenau disinfection gas chamber

Zyklon B, chlorine, steam, haircuts, uniforms and simple soap and water were used to disinfect buildings, bedding, clothing, personnel and other items. The fact that the Germans dedicated a great deal of time, effort and resources toward preserving the health of the inmates is, in and of itself, a contradiction of the official narrative.

Of the many hundreds of tons of documents obtained by the allies, not a single document has ever been discovered which proves there was a policy to exterminate Jews. According to all creditable evidence, the policy regarding the Jews -- the "final solution" -- was one of expulsion from Germany, not extermination. Furthermore, it must be considered that this policy was not unique to Germany as Jews had been expelled from approximately 67 countries and persecuted in as many more prior to World War II according to Jewish history. As one historian stated, "When you ask what have the Germans done to the Jews, you must always ask what have the Jews done to the Germans".

Lastly, the internment of criminals, subversives and undesirables, however unethical the practice may have been in some cases, was not unusual. Blacks were still being lynched in the United States during this time and the U.S. government forced both German and Japanese Americans into concentration camps during World War II. Similar actions were taken elsewhere throughout history.

What was the leading cause of death of the inmates in the German concentration camps of World War II?

Answer 6

The volume of creditable witness and scientific evidence seems to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the vast majority of deaths were due to disease and starvation. Typhus, a lethal disease carried by lice, reached epidemic proportions throughout Europe during the 1940's. The problem was worse within the camps during the last months of the war as a direct result of the barbaric and indiscriminate carpet bombing of German cities and infrastructure which was used to transport food, medicine and other supplies to the camps and elsewhere. The horrific conditions the inmates endured can therefore be directly attributed to the allies. Furthermore, many of the deaths in the camps occurred while they were under allied control.

Lastly, there is little evidence of maltreatment of the prisoners by the Schutzstaffel Squadron (SS) and no evidence that any of the deaths were caused by exposure to hydrogen cyanide, the gas produced from Zyklon B pellets. Unknown to many is the fact that thousands of autopsies were conducted which support this conclusion, however this evidence is kept from the public and these documents were not entered as evidence during the Nuremberg trials. The Institute for Historical Review has the following to say regarding Dr. Charles Larson, a pathologist and member of the U.S. War Crimes Investigation Team, who preformed hundreds of autopsies on concentration camp corpses:

When American and British forces overran western and central Germany in the spring of 1945, they were followed by troops charged with discovering and securing any evidence of German war crimes.

Among them was Dr. Charles Larson, one of America’s leading forensic pathologists, who was assigned to the US Army’s Judge Advocate General’s Department. As part of a US War Crimes Investigation Team, Dr. Larson performed autopsies at Dachau and some twenty other German camps, examining on some days more than 100 corpses. After his grim work at Dachau, he was questioned for three days by US Army prosecutors. [1]

Dr. Larson’s findings? In an 1980 newspaper interview he said: "What we’ve heard is that six million Jews were exterminated. Part of that is a hoax." [2] And what part was the hoax? Dr. Larson, who told his biographer that to his knowledge he "was the only forensic pathologist on duty in the entire European Theater" of Allied military operations, [3] confirmed that "never was a case of poison gas uncovered." [4]

Several amenities were available for use by the prisoners of Auschwitz, including a swimming pool.

Answer 7

Auschwitz Main Camp Inmate Swimming Pool

The pool was pretty deep, and you could drown if you didn’t know how to swim. But if you paddled with your arms and legs, you could stay on the surface. We were in the water about 5 or 10 minutes. -- Stanislaw Bialas, inmate who was transported to Auschwitz in 1940

Not usually part of the Auschwitz tour, curious visitors are sometimes told the swimming pool is not a swimming pool at all, but rather a water reservoir for fighting fires which was built in the shape of a swimming pool. If that were true, one may wonder why such a "reservoir" would have steps and ladders leading into it, as well as a high dive, starter blocks and decorative fixtures. The swimming pool is clearly located where the prisoners had access to it as we can see the barracks to the left and the perimeter fence to the right of the pool in the photograph.

In at least some of the camps prisoners could send and receive mail from the camp post office. In Auschwitz there was also a theater, a library, approximately 22 kitchens, as well as hot houses for growing food, areas for music, art and sports and even a brothel. From the camp store prisoners could use the script they earned while working in the factories in Monowitz (one of the three main camps at Auschwitz) or sent to them in parcels to purchase some convenience items when they were available, including cigarettes and weak beer.

Hitler and Gun Control

Hitler disarmed the German population, thus preventing them from defending themselves against his brutal regime.

Answer 8

Contrary to what the public is often told, the change to the German gun laws in 1938 removed or relaxed several restrictions regarding firearms. Permits were no longer required for long guns and the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as well as the possession of ammunition, was deregulated. Also the age limit for purchasing firearms was lowered from 20 to 18 and firearm permits became valid for three years instead of one. While it is true that Hitler disarmed the German Jews, this occurred years after international Jewry had declared economic warfare upon Germany, thus formally establishing themselves as an enemy of the state which, according to international law, gave Germany the legal right to disarm them.

Had Hitler won the war, we'd all be speaking German!

Answer 9

Adolf Hitler Feeding Deer

What Hitler's unspoken ambitions might have been, no one knows, however it does not appear that Hitler had any intention of world domination and this is certainly not something the German people aspired to. In fact Hitler made many documented attempts to avert World War II, each being flatly and universally rejected by those who stood to gain from a war with Germany.

  • 17 May, 1933, Hitler delivers a speech declaring that Germany is willing to disarm if the neighboring countries would reciprocate. The proposal is rejected.
  • 18 Dec., 1933, Hitler submits a six point proposal for the improvement of international relations.
  • 26 Jan., 1934, Hitler completes a non-aggression pact with Poland.
  • 21 May, 1935, Hitler makes another attempt to avoid the growing possibility of war.
  • 18 Jun., 1935, Hitler negotiated a Naval agreement with Great Britain in which it was stated that Germany was to have a naval strength limited to 35% of that of the British Navy.
  • 31 Mar., 1936, Hitler formulates a comprehensive plan for peace.
  • 6 Dec., 1938, Hitler instructs the German Foreign Minister to make an agreement with France.
  • 23 Aug., 1939, Hitler signs the German-Soviet Nonaggression Pact.
  • 3 Sep., 1939, Great Britain and France declare war on Germany followed by India, Australia and New Zealand. Several more countries soon follow.
  • 6 Oct., 1939, after war had been declared on Germany, Hitler makes a speech, stating in part, "I do not believe that there is any responsible statesman in Europe who does not in his heart desire prosperity for his people. But such a desire can only be realized if all the nations inhabiting this continent decide to work together. To assist in ensuring this co-operation must be the aim of every man who is sincerely struggling for the future of his own people."

In a 1941 radio broadcast in Berlin, Hitler stated, in part:

This conspiracy of democratic Jews and Free Masons dragged Europe into war two years ago. Arms had to decide.

Since then a struggle has been taking place between truth and lies and, as always, this war will end in the victory for truth. In other words, whatever lies British propaganda, international world Jewry and its democratic accomplices may concoct they will not change historical facts. And it is a historical fact that for two years now Germany has been defeating one opponent after another.

I did not want it. Immediately after the first conflict I again held out my hand. I have been a soldier myself and I know how difficult it is to win a victory.

My hand was rejected. And since then we have seen that each peace offer was immediately exploited by the warmonger Churchill and his confreres so that they could say it was proof of our weakness.

And on April 29, 1945, the day of his death, Hitler wrote:

It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted the war in 1939. It was desired and instigated exclusively by those international statesmen who were either of Jewish descent or worked for Jewish interests. I have made too many offers for the control and limitation of armaments, which posterity will not for all time be able to disregard for the responsibility for the outbreak of this war to be laid on me. I have further never wished that after the first fatal world war a second against England, or even against America, should break out. Centuries will pass away, but out of the ruins of our towns and monuments the hatred against those finally responsible whom we have to thank for everything, international Jewry and its helpers, will grow.

Governments can incarcerate citizens for challenging the mainstream version of the Jewish holocaust of World War II.

Answer 10

Truth Does Not Fear Investigation

"To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize?" -- Kevin Alfred Strom

If you live in one of the following countries, your inherent right to free speech according to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is under severe attack and you can be fined and/or imprisoned for challenging the establishment view regarding the Jewish holocaust, even if the evidence provided is scientifically provable and presented in a court of law

For each of the countries listed below there are laws that restrict historical revisionism and freedom of speech, or legislation which is being considered, or the country has a history of prosecuting historical revisionists. If you live in one of the following countries you should research any legislation that may be applicable before possessing, publishing, sharing, or discussing in public any subject which is critical of the alleged Jewish holocaust of World War II:

  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Bosnia
  • Canada (considering legislation, history of persecution)
  • Czech Republic
  • European Union
  • France
  • Germany
  • Hungary
  • Ireland (possible history of persecution)
  • Israel
  • Italy
  • Liechtenstein
  • Lithuania
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Poland
  • Portugal
  • Romania
  • Spain
  • Switzerland
  • United States (considering legislation, history of persecution)

For further reading and resources, see Rescuing Israel: The Holocaust.

Rescuing Israel: The Holocaust - The Present

I've never seen a President -- I don't care who he is -- stand up to [the Jews] ... They always get what they want. The Israelis know what is going on all the time. I got to the point where I wouldn't write anything down. If the American people understood what a grip these people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms. -- Admiral Thomas Moorer, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Richard H. Curtiss, A Changing Image: American Perceptions of the Arab-Israeli Dispute. American Educational Trust, 1986

"I've never seen a President -- I don't care who he is -- stand up to [the Jews] ... They always get what they want. The Israelis know what is going on all the time. I got to the point where I wouldn't write anything down. If the American people understood what a grip these people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms." -- Admiral Thomas Moorer, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Richard H. Curtiss, A Changing Image: American Perceptions of the Arab-Israeli Dispute. American Educational Trust, 1986

Aaron Russo - America: Freedom to Fascism

Aaron Russo
Aaron Russo, February 14, 1943 - August 24, 2007

America: Freedom to Fascism was the final film made by Aaron Russo, a filmmaker who is well known for his films Trading Places, Wise Guys, The Rose and Mad as Hell. Aaron had been a close personal friend of Nicholas Rockefeller at one time and it was after Rockefeller began letting him in on the secret agendas of the worlds elite that Aaron felt he needed to take action.

Aaron died of cancer in 2007, shortly after the completion of America: Freedom to Fascism. Although the film may have actually lost money, it has been said that he felt it was the most important film he had ever made and that he was very proud it. The film became a huge hit on the internet and is one of the most important documentary films ever produced in my opinion. It is a film that every single American needs to see.

From the films website (website was taken down May, 2016):

Aaron will be profoundly missed but always remembered. He was a husband, father, friend, mentor, and inspiration to many. Aaron's long list of achievements includes his work in the areas of filmmaking and political activism. His documentary film, "America: From Freedom to Fascism", debunked the justification of both the IRS and the Federal Reserve as well as exposed their crooked basis. This movie received widespread acclaim, including opening to standing ovations at the Cannes Film Festival. Congressman Ron Paul was also featured in the documentary, in which he presents his views on the economy and the Federal Reserve.

Video: America: Freedom to Fascism

Michael Ruppert - Collapse

Michael Ruppert
Michael Ruppert, February 3, 1951 - April 13, 2014

Michael Ruppert, a former LAPD officer, is another man i have a great deal of respect for. His integrity cannot be questioned, nor can the obvious and sobering predictions he has made regarding the future of our civilization should we continue along a path driven entirely by greed with almost complete disregard for our planet and, environment and ourselves.

Michael is the author of Crossing The Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil, a book which centers around how our continually growing civilization, over 7 billion in number now, is completely and utterly dependent upon a single, finite resource, the production of which has already reached its peak and is now in permanent decline. His message, which he has dedicated his life to sharing, is perhaps the most important message that we have to consider.

Michael took his own life in April, 2014, but he has left us with a large and important volume of work including his research into CIA drug trafficking, the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks within the U.S., politics and the inevitable collapse of our industrialized civilization due to peak oil.

Video: Collapse


Michael was interviewed after the completion of Collapse by Peter Joseph, the creator of the Zeitgeist film series and network. Some of Peter's work can be found on the next page.

Video: In Memory of Michael C Ruppert, Full Interview, Zeitgeist Moving Forward by Peter Joseph

Abby Martin of RT did a touching tribute to Michael:

Video: Abby Martin's Personal Tribute to Investigative Journalist Michael C. Ruppert

Commentary on recent events regarding the holocaust and World War II

- Secrets of The Dead - Bugging Hitler's Soldiers

On May 2nd, 2013, the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) published the documentary film Secrets of The Dead: Bugging Hitler's Soldiers on their website. The film documents a secret bugging operation of high ranking World War II German military prisoners that were held by the British. Over 100,000 hours of audio recordings are are said to have been captured by MI19, the division of British intelligence who bugged the elaborate homes in which the prisoners were held. We are told that the audio tapes were transcribed, translated and sent directly to Winston Churchill. There are several factual inaccuracies presented in the film and one notably large omission. Here is a link to the transcript of the film for reference.

The foremost problem is one of authenticity; the original recordings were destroyed, we are told, which is decidedly convenient as it is now impossible to verify whether what was recorded actually matches the transcripts. It is also worth pointing out that most of the personnel monitoring the listening equipment were Jewish refuges from Germany. Why British intelligence would task Jewish refuges with gathering possibly vital information from key military personal, of which many were generals, from the very people who persecuted them is nearly unfathomable to me. We are told the reason is because of their familiarity with the German language which insinuates there were no German speaking personnel in Britain capable of doing the work. If that was the case, British intelligence must have had a very difficult time translating the hoards of other German communications that were intercepted.

The film refers to the former Buchenwald concentration camp in Germany as a death camp, which it was not. Both mainstream holocaust historians and revisionists agree that there were no homicidal gas chambers at Buchenwald. The film also repeats the long debunked claim that lampshades were made from tattooed human skin. References: 1, 2, 3, 4

During the film the viewer is presented with a very well known -- and very forged -- photograph of prisoners in a bunk house at Buchenwald:

Buchenwald Missing Man Forgery
Forged version of the infamous Buchenwald barrack photograph

The original photograph, published in the May 6th, 1945 edition of The New York Times Magazine, is somewhat less dramatic:

Buchenwald Missing Man Forgery - Original
Original version of the infamous Buchenwald barrack photograph (click to enlarge)

One of the most important aspects of the film was not what it contained, but what it didn't contain; at no time are gas chambers mentioned, homicidal or otherwise. I don't think there is any doubt whatsoever that PBS would have showcased any hint of homicidal gas chambers had a single one of the German prisoners referred to them among the 100,000+ hours of audio tape. It would seem there was little chance that any conversation about gas chambers could have been missed since, as we are told, "MI19 specially designed microphones reached everywhere; nothing was out of range.", and "We knew that the microphones must have been of very high quality because we could hear the prisoners very clearly and even if they whispered to their cell mate it was very often possible to pick up what they said.".

It is always well worth questioning the integrity of mainstream media. One could begin by questioning who owns the very few companies that control approximately 80-90% of everything we read, watch and listen to. Who are the board members and what relationships with other institutions do they have? As with my article about NPR, the conflicts of interest present within PBS are blatantly obvious, including ties to the National Security Agency (NSA), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Obama for America, Polaris Government Relations and several other companies, institutions and foundations. Among the board members of PBS is Sharon Percy Rockefeller who is a member of the Bilderberg Group. The Bilderberg Group is sort of a private club, not unlike the Bohemian Club, whose members rank among the worlds richest and most powerful people on the planet and include heads of state, future presidents and prominent politicians, media representatives, bankers and others, many of whom are Jewish. Their agenda, the content of their meetings and even the guest list are kept secret, though more is being learned about this elite club with the advent of the internet.

As with National Public Radio, one may wonder where the "public" is in the Public Broadcasting Service -- an organization that, very much like NPR, is funded in part by the the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the government and various foundations and private corporations. The public media watchdog organization, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR), has published several articles critical of PBS, including Problems at PBS, From Rose to Koch, PBS Drone Coverage Brought to You by Drone Makers, PBS Goes to Israel and Palestine-Mostly Israel, PBS Reports Iran Nuke Claims as Facts and many others.

- Dr. Caroline Sturdy Colls - Treblinka: Hitler's Killing Machine

A recent documentary by the Smithsonian Institute titled Treblinka: Hitler's Killing Machine used the work of Dr. Caroline Sturdy Colls, a British forensic archeologist from Staffordshire University, in a laughable effort to prove that homicidal gas chambers were employed at Treblinka to exterminate the Jews. The film was financed by Jewish interests, including the Treblinka Museum and Polish authorities, and was supported by the chief rabbi of Poland.

The prevalent proof of the existence of homicidal gas chambers at Treblinka was offered in the form of several tiles which were uncovered. Colls stated in the documentary that the tiles reminded her of the Star of David that survivors said they saw as they entered the building. The claims that 1), a Star of David is on the tile and 2), that the star would have been visible to prisoners are both provably false.

Referring to the image below, it is immediately apparent that the "Star of David" is not very similar to the actual Star of David. Secondly, the viewer will notice several rows of round bumps on the tile. These bumps are placed on the bottom of the tile for cementing purposes, not on the top, and therefore the "Star of David" would never have been visible to anyone. It is the underside of the tile that is shown in video.

Caroline Sturdy Colls - Treblinka Star of David Tile
Treblinka 'Star of David' tile uncovered by Caroline Sturdy Colls was proven to be a fraudulent claim (click to enlarge)

The untruths regarding the tiles that were presented by Colls' team and the Smithsonian were quickly exposed by revisionists. Adding to the embarrassment of the "forensic archeologist" and the Smithsonian Institute is an article, titled Smithsonian Red-Faced after "Treblinka Star of David Tiles" Shown to be Not Jewish At All. From the article:

"Now for the first time, Caroline and her team have hard evidence confirming the existence of the gas chambers," the narrator adds.

Unfortunately for the Smithsonian, Colls and Schute, the "Star of David" to which they refer is nothing of the sort.

Firstly, the symbol—a six pointed solid star, with a dot in its center, surrounded by a circle, and with a clear "D" letter to its right, is imprinted on the back of the tile—which means that wherever it would have been placed, the symbol would have been cemented onto the floor, and would not have been visible.

This makes Colls's claim that the symbol was there to "make people think they were going somewhere safe" complete nonsense.

For a complete breakdown of the hoax perpetrated by Caroline Sturdy Colls and the Smithsonian Institute, see the documentary, The Treblinka Archaeology Hoax, by Eric Hunt and the Holocaust Hoax Museum.

Index | Previous: The Quotes | Next: The Future | Last: Reader Comments

Rescuing Israel: The Holocaust - The Scholar

"[...] there was a Holocaust, which is, by the way, more easily said than demonstrated." — Is There a New Anti-Semitism? A Conversation with Raul Hilberg, considered to be the world's preeminent scholar of the Holocaust

"[...] there was a Holocaust, which is, by the way, more easily said than demonstrated." — Is There a New Anti-Semitism? A Conversation with Raul Hilberg, considered to be the world's preeminent scholar of the Holocaust

Video: Ernst Zundel - Interviewed by an Israeli journalist

Due to the numerous outlandish claims laid by Irene Zisblatt, several researches have had a field day dissecting her story, including Joachim Neander, PhD, a Polish scholar who has written publications regarding the holocaust in Poland, Germany, Israel and the United States and who once held a Fellowship for Archival Research at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington D.C..

In 2010, Neander wrote an analysis of Zisblatt's story titled Irene Zisblatt, the "Diamond Girl" - Fact or Fiction? in which he concluded that Zisblatt's story is "not in accordance with the historically established facts" and "implausible". He begins finding holes in her story early in her life, but here i will quote only a few of the more glaring inconsistencies he points out, beginning with her alleged induction into Auschwitz. If you will recall, Irene Zisblatt was born as Chana Seigelstein and that is how he refers to her here:

Chana's head is completely shaved, and she receives the prisoner number 61397, which is tattooed on her arm (35).[25] Near by, she witnesses "women workers removing fillings and crowns, pulling gold teeth" from the registered prisoners (36). Before leaving, she receives "a pajama top" as her "only article of clothing," and she is "forced to look into [a] large mirror" at the door, where she does not recognize herself - an additional act of humiliation. She is then marched, together with one thousand other women, "into a place called Birkenau," to a wooden barrack (36) in "Lager C" (51), better known as "Camp sector BIIc."

Apart from the fact that the prisoner reception building nowhere had "a huge mirror" into which the prisoners were forced to look, and that the Zugänge (intakes) received a little bit more of clothing than a pajama top that barely would have covered their nakedness,[26] the narration contains three major implausibilities. First, the Auschwitz prisoner number "61397" was given on September 9, 1943, to Agnieszka Pastuszek, a non-Jewish, Polish political prisoner,[27] who had arrived with a prisoner transport from Katowice prison.[28]. Hungarian Jewish women prisoners who were taken in between May 16 and 26, 1944, received numbers from A-3622 to A-6027.[29] Chana could also not have received the number of a dead prisoner because after February 2, 1942, Auschwitz prisoner numbers were no more issued twice.[30]

Second, the plundering of dental gold was carried out on the corpses of the dead, but never on living prisoners on intake. Third, if Chana had been registered on arrival, she would have been sent to one of the "regular" women camps, such as BIa or BIb. BIIc was used during the "Hungarian action" as a transit camp for non-registered Jewish women - who, therefore, had not been tattooed - and who on arrival had been spared from gassing. SS doctors regularly combed the transit camp for deportees who would be shipped into the Reich's interior for slave labor (without registration at Auschwitz) or taken in at Auschwitz (and then registered there), and those who were sent to the gas chamber.[31]

Ilse Koch in prison
Ilse Koch prison photograph (click to enlarge)

Regarding Zisblatt's claim of nearly having her skin harvested by Ilse Kock to make a lampshade out of her, Neander provides more detail as to why Ilse failed to show up that fateful day:

Chana soon realizes that she and the other fourteen Jewish girls were selected for a horrible fate: to become a lampshade (45). Ilse Koch, "an SS woman . . . a maniac . . . [who] likes human gloves made out of human skin and lampshades," is "coming to Majdanek to select her material for the lampshades, and we have the skin for it." Mrs. Koch, however, does not show up. [35] Small wonder, since she, as of August 25, 1943, has been sitting behind bars in the Weimar, Germany, Gestapo prison.[36] So, "after forty-eight immeasurable hours," the group returns to Auschwitz, without having achieved anything (45).

Though long since debunked as a contemporary legend, lampshades allegedly made from victims of the Holocaust are a stock phrase in Holocaust remembrance.[37] It is, therefore, not surprising to find the legend in a book that serves its readers with nearly all Holocaust clichés.

Further along Neander comments on Zisblat's claim of having her tattoo removed:

The tale of the removal of the prisoner numbers, however, is so full of implausibilities that it must be regarded as pure fantasy, and regretfully not as a good one. First, Mengele, a simple camp physician, by no means one of the camp brass, could never have dared to publicly remove the camp number, the one and only identification characteristic of a prisoner at Auschwitz,[60] from a prisoner's body. (Six other SS members were allegedly present!) Second, he need not have made an "experiment" to this effect, as methods of removal of tattoos were well-known, and these were far less painful as the procedure described by Mrs. Zisblatt. Third, it would not have made sense to kill the test subject immediately after an experiment that allegedly should serve to find out how to remove "membership and [...] blood type" tattoos from the bodies of SS men (64). It was an "experiment," and Mengele would have had to wait for its outcome, how the wound was healing, if scars would remain, etc. Let us not forget that he saw himself as a "scientist."

As mentioned previously, Zisblatt claims that she narrowly avoided the gas chamber at one point because it was "too full", after which she was rescued by a familiar Hungarian Jew who threw her over the Auschwitz perimeter fence onto a rail car destined for another camp. Following is what Neander has to say regarding this epic feat:

This is the most implausible episode in Mrs. Zisblatt's story. Let us omit the not quite unimportant change that the beginning of her story underwent between her video interview and the writing of her book, and let us rather concentrate on the events in the gas chamber. First, if indeed a frail little girl would have clung to the door of the gas chamber and so prevented its closing, the SS man at the door would have made short work of her: either cramming her into the gas chamber by force, or simply killing her on the spot. Second, a glance at the pictures of crematorium III (or its mirror image, crematorium II) shows that there was no place "under the roof" where a person could hide.[70]

Third, when 1,500 people were gassed, quite a few SS men were in and around the crematorium building. Chana would under no circumstances have remained undetected. Neither when she was running from the gas chamber through the "ramp" (?) to the eave, nor when she went from there together with the young man from the Sonderkommando to the electrified fence, nor when she was thrown over it. Fourth, the young man must have been an athletics champion, as the distance between the railroad tracks and the fence around crematorium III was over 100 ft., the fence had a height of about 10 ft., and Chana weighed about sixty pounds.[71] Fifth, if there had been a train with open cars[72] waiting with prisoners near the crematoria, it would have been guarded by SS personnel who doubtlessly would have noticed the unconventional arrival of Chana by "air lift." And last not least, she would have been noticed at the latest at roll call on arrival, because her name would not have appeared in the transport list.

Although i think Joachim Neander has done a reasonably fair job of pointing out some of the many glaring flaws in Zisblatt's story, he is obviously a supporter of the mainstream version of history regarding homicidal gas chambers, apparently choosing to ignore the volumes of evidence to the contrary. What strikes me a bit odd in Neanders' analysis of Zisblatt's story is that he does not seem to realize that if gassings actually did take place in Auschwitz or elsewhere, Zisblatt and the other handful of alleged camp survivors who claim to have first-hand knowledge of homicidal gas chambers, would not have had to fabricate such stories since the exterminations themselves would have provided plenty of authentic horror.

Carolyn Yeager has written her own analysis of Neanders' analysis titled 'Scholar: Holocaust survivor memoir is "exaggerated" & "implausible"' because she feels that Neander, who writes for some major publications regarding the holocaust, was actually too soft on Zisblatt, reasoning that he "wishes to maintain his reputation as a scholar". In her article she points out a few additional inconsistencies in Zisblatt's story which Neander overlooks.

Regarding Zisblatt's claim of being put in a standing cell dungeon after Dr. Mengele put solution in her eyes to change their color, Yeager writes the following:

The version of the eye-experiment story in which the fifteen women were put into a small cubicle that was divided into little sections, designed so that they could walk into or touch the person in the section on either side only, was in Zisblatt's Shoah testimony. In her book, the five girls are standing very close together in one small cell located below the Birkenau infirmary. If this is her idea of what "standing cells" were (after reading the literature about them), she has botched it up as she does everything else. The four Stehzellen alleged to be in the basement of Block 11 at Auschwitz (for which there is no definitive evidence beside witness testimony that they ever existed [1]; what is shown to visitors today are all reconstructions) were in the main camp, not in Birkenau. These reconstructions have a tiny door that would make it extremely difficult for each person to enter and be brought out again. According to official historiography, the alleged standing cells were torn down by order of Arthur Liebehenschel, the new camp commandant on December 1, 1943. [2] Assuming that this is so, they could not have existed when "Chana" and "Sabka" were being "experimented" on.

Zisblatt also claims to have had the fortune of meeting General George S. Patton in a hospital in Pilzen, Czechoslovakia, where he gave her his scarf and his four star "buttons". Regarding this incredible encounter, Yeager writes:

The fantastic account of American "Liberator" General George S. Patton meeting with Chana is one of the incidents that Neander decides to "set aside" on the grounds that "it is difficult to prove or disprove." Difficult, perhaps, but not impossible to discover that Patton was never in the Volary or Pilsen area when Zisblatt claims she was there.

Index | Previous: The Claims | Next: The Miracles | Last: Reader Comments

Rescuing Israel: The Holocaust - Primary Resources

Resources for further study of the Jewish holocaust, Zionism, Adolf Hitler, and Germany's role in World War II.

World War I, II and holocaust revisionism

Irene Zisblatt


Adolf Hitler

Nuremberg and Dachau military tribunals

Notable Jewish historical revisionists and/or critics of Israel

  • Alfred Lilienthal - author and critic of Israel and Zionism
  • Arno Mayer - author, professor, historian and holocaust revisionist
  • Avi Shlaim - an Israeli historian who writes for The Guardian, Avi is an anti-Zionist and critic of Israel
  • Bernard Lazare - author and critic of Zionism
  • Benjamin Freedman - a business man and critic of Jewry and Zionism, Benjamin is well known for his 1961 lecture at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., during which he talked about the Zionist role and motives in World War I and World War II
  • Christopher Hitchens - prolific writer, author and holocaust revisionist
  • David Cole - perhaps one of the most well known Jewish revisionists, David is well known for his documentary films regarding Auschwitz
  • Ditlieb Felderer - a prolific researcher and holocaust revisionist, Ditlieb is responsible for gathering a massive amount of critical evidence which refutes the holocaust from every major concentration camp in Europe
  • Dr. Oscar Levy - critic of Israel/Zionism, Bolshevism, communism
  • Florian Abrahamowicz - priest and holocaust revisionist
  • Gerard Menuhin - holocaust/historical revisionist, critic of Israel/Zionism
  • Gilad Atzmon - a holocaust revisionist and critic of Jewry and Zionism, Gilad is also a writer and political activist
  • Henry Herskovitz - holocaust revisionist, anti-Zionist, author, founder of Jewish Witnesses for Peace and friends
  • Israel Shahak - professor, writer and critic of Israel and Zionism
  • Israel Shamir - a well known holocaust revisionist and critic of Israel and Zionism, Israel wrote for Haaretz at one point
  • Jack Bernstein - author and critic of Israel and Zionism
  • Jews For Hitler (BitChute channel)
  • Joseph Ginsberg - a holocaust revisionist and author of several books and pamphlets, Joseph played an important part in the 1988 trial of Ernst Zündel in Canada
  • Karl Marx - the founder of Marxism, Karl was a philosopher, economist, sociologist, journalist and critic of Jewry and communism
  • Lenni Brenner - a writer, activist and critic of Zionism, Lenni wrote several books on this topic including 51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis
  • Miko Peled - author, activist and critic of Zionism
  • Myron Fagan - critic of Zionism and the international Jewish-Zionist criminal cabal
  • Natali Cohen Vaxberg - an extreme leftist performance artist, holocaust revisionist and critic of Zionism
  • Nathanael Kapner - a holocaust revisionist and outspoken critic of Israel and Zionism
  • Norman Finkelstein - a political scientist, activist, professor, and author, Norman is a staunch anti-Zionist and critic of Israel
  • Paul Eisen - writer and holocaust revisionist
  • Robert Litoff - Jewish scholar and holocaust revisionist
  • Roger Dommergue - a French holocaust revisionist
  • Roi Tov - author, writer and former officer in the Israeli military, Roi is, or was (his whereabouts are apparently unknown) a critic of Zionism
  • Steve Lendman - author, journalist, winner of the 2008 Project Censored award and critic of Zionism
  • The Difference Between Judaism and Zionism | G. Neuburger
  • Moshe Ber Beck - Rabbi, author and critic of Zionism
  • Yehuda Elkana - historian, philosopher, holocaust revisionist and critic of Zionism
  • Yosef Tzvi ben Porat - Rabbi, critic of established Jewish history and the narrative regarding Hitler

Revisionist material, general

Zionist/Jewish influence, World War I & II specific

Holocaust survivor testimony and resources

Fraudulent holocaust survivors and scams

World War II allied war crimes

Historical revisionism resources

Persecution of historical revisionists

Rescuing Israel: The Holocaust - The Law

"To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize?" -- Kevin Alfred Strom, 1993

"To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize?" -- Kevin Alfred Strom

Article 19 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights states: "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers." Many countries do not adhere to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights however.

For each of the countries listed below there are laws that restrict historical revisionism and freedom of speech, or legislation which is being considered that would restrict freedom of speech, or the country has a history of persecuting holocaust revisionists. If you live in one of the following countries you should research any legislation that may be applicable before possessing, publishing, sharing, or even discussing in public any subject which is critical of the mainstream historical record, particularly the alleged Jewish holocaust of World War II:

  • Australia
  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Bosnia
  • Canada
  • Czech Republic
  • European Union
  • France
  • Germany
  • Greece
  • Hungary
  • Israel
  • Italy
  • Liechtenstein
  • Lithuania
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Poland
  • Portugal
  • Romania
  • Russia
  • Slovakia
  • Spain
  • Switzerland
  • United States


I applaud all historical revisionists who have the courage to publish their findings despite the consequences. It is through the work of these courageous people that we have the opportunity to shake the chains that bind us and explore our human potential.

Index | Previous: The Future | Next: About the Author | Last: Reader Comments