"I knew that the next group that was going to come in was going to find me, and they were going to put me back in there [the gas chamber]. But for that moment I had hope, and then a miracle happened." -- Irene Zisblatt retelling her account of avoiding the gas chamber
"I knew that the next group that was going to come in was going to find me, and they were going to put me back in there [the gas chamber]. But for that moment I had hope, and then a miracle happened." -- Irene Zisblatt retelling her account of avoiding the gas chamber at Auschwitz
Video: Holocaust faker explains himself
I suspect the reader my have had their fill of Irene Weisberg Zisblatt by this point, so let us begin to close the book on the matter by briefly recapping some of the many miracles we have extracted from her story, that of an iconic and triumphant holocaust survivor who:
managed to save 4 diamonds from being discovered by the Germans by repeatedly swallowing, defecating and retrieving them again for 15 months without contracting any life threatening diseases, despite not being able to clean them properly, or clean them at all in at least one instance
managed to survive having viruses injected under her fingernails by Dr. Joseph Mengele, apparently without contracting any life threatening diseases
managed to survive having chemicals injected into her eyes by Dr. Mengele, apparently without suffering any long term eye health issues
managed to survive several days with no food or clean water in a filthy dungeon, ankle deep in contaminated water where she and her fellow prisoners defecated, sustaining herself by drinking the water in which they stood, once again without contracting any life threatening diseases
managed to survive having her tattoo removed through a series of experimental procedures, each lasting "hours at a time" over the course of a week to ten days, and which included "injecting", "pulling", "cutting" and "digging", without anesthesia and without leaving a scar, due in part to the help of a sympathetic nurse who "worked for the underground" and placed pressure on the wound to stop the bleeding while Dr. Mengele was preoccupied
managed to avoid a lethal injection ordered by Dr. Mengele due to his nurse who "worked for the underground" and substituted a non-lethal one
managed to avoid becoming a lampshade in 1944 because Ilse Koch, who was in prison since 1943, failed to show up to harvest her skin
managed to avoid the Auschwitz gas chamber because it was "too full", later hiding under the eaves of a crematory which were too high to provide any shelter
managed to survive having been given a "watery soup filled with chemicals to destroy her reproductive organs", later giving birth to two children
managed to escape from the notorious Auschwitz "factory of death", where there is no record of her internment, due in no small part to the heroic assistance of a young Hungarian Jew, whose name she cannot remember, who threw her at least 100 feet in distance over a 10 foot high fence onto a train car destined for another camp for which she had no accompanying paperwork
managed to escape into the forest while on a forced "death march", sustaining herself by digging up food in the possibly frozen ground of a Polish winter, apparently without any survival training
managed to meet General George S. Patton in an American Army hospital in Pilzen, Checkoslovakia, where he bestowed upon her his scarf and four star insignia, even though both Zisblatt and Patton could not have both been there at the time she alleges
While it is a certainty that many miracles were witnessed during the course of the the Second World War, the odds that any one of Zisblatt's major claims are authentic range from slim to none when they are measured against logic alone, much less what we now know to be factual. Even if we cast aside the voluminous evidence that disproves and discredits nearly every one of her extraordinary claims, one might wonder what the odds might be that all of these miracles could be attributed to a single person.
Lastly, it is imperative that the reader understand that Zisblatt's story is not at all unique among the very small number of alleged holocaust survivors who claim to have witnessed homicidal gas chambers and the mass extermination of the Jews. Unfortunately, audio-visual testimony from many authentic survivors whose account of their experience refutes the official version of the holocaust narrative has been and continues to be suppressed. Steven Spielberg's USC Shoah Foundation Visual History Archive contains approximately 53,000 recorded testimonials, 98% of which include audio-visual testimony from survivors of World War II and the German concentration camps. Of these, approximately 13,000 testimonials are related to Auschwitz, yet only about 3% of those (approximately 440) are available for on-line viewing for what is the most notorious extermination camp on the planet. The USC Shoah Foundation YouTube channel only makes available a small number of carefully selected videos (less than 800 when i last checked), none of which, by the way, include the testimony of Irene Zisblatt. Although her story was showcased by Steven Spielberg, apparently it was a bit too flashy for even the USC Shoah Foundation.
The USC Shoah Foundation makes accessing their archives quite difficult unless you are an educator or visit one of the archives in person. In the past one could submit a request to access individual videos which are not made available for on-line viewing, however it appears this policy may have changed, or perhaps this option is only available to educators. I never once received a reply for any of the several requests i submitted. I suspect the reason for the policy change, if indeed it was changed, is due to holocaust revisionists who had posted videos of survivor testimonials from the archives on-line which contradicted the official holocaust narrative. Many, if not most of these videos have since disappeared from the more popular video sharing websites, likely due to pressure from Jewish-Zionist interests that do not want the truth to be disseminated, even when that truth comes from genuine survivors of the German concentration camps of World War II.
Eric Hunt, creator of several historical revisionist websites, had this to say after receiving a letter from the USC Shoah Foundation informing him that he had been banned from accessing the archive:
Steven Spielberg's USC Survivors of the Shoah Visual History Foundation is known for their over 50,000 video "testimonies" which supposedly prove that six million Jews were gassed by evil Germans.
However, when Spielberg's Shoah Foundation archives are actually accessed and analyzed, these video archives are in reality an invaluable treasure trove for Holocaust truthers.
I recently received a letter in the mail banning me from the Stanford University libraries. You see, I publicly shamed the Shoah Foundation and Holocaust promotion industry by daring to show the public what these videos contain - and analyzing the truth and lies they tell.
"Care must be taken not to give a platform for deniers... or seek to disprove the deniers' position through normal historical debate and rational argument" -- Guidelines for Teaching about the Holocaust at the Stockholm International Forum, 2000
"Care must be taken not to give a platform for deniers... or seek to disprove the deniers' position through normal historical debate and rational argument" -- Guidelines for Teaching about the Holocaust at the Stockholm International Forum, 2000
The first issue with Irene Weisberg Zisblatt is, who is Irene Weisberg Zisblatt? She has used several names throughout her life including Irene Segelstern (Red Cross document), Irene Ziegelstein (Spielberg's Last Days testimony), Chana Seigelstein (autobiography), Channah Sura (Hebrew name), Irene Lewin (passenger manifest when relocating to America), Irene Zeigelfrum (a false name according to the USC Shoah Foundation) and Irene Stein (taken after her husbands death).
More concerning than the name juggling however is her catalog of fantastic claims and the many nontrivial alterations her story has undergone as events are added, withdrawn and altered. Since many of these inconsistencies have already been cataloged by others, i will not bother to reexamine each one of them, but we will critique some of the most glaring discrepancies.
Video: Spielberg's Hoax - The Last Days of The Big Lie
Alleged methods of extermination in the camps which are no longer accepted as factual include the use of pneumatic hammers, fire, various forms of electrocution, steam chambers, quicklime, suffocation, poisoning, drowning, forcing prisoners to climb trees which other prisoners were made to cut down, being subjected to ferocious animals, using a manually operated ramrod machine to impale their skulls and many, many others.
One particularly incredible claim put forth by the Soviets suggested that the Germans vaporized 20,000 Jews using a nuclear bomb. Though not a shred of creditable evidence exists to support this claim, it was used to vilify the Nazis at the post-war Nuremberg trials when Justice Robert H. Jackson, the head American prosecutor, questioned Albert Speer about it:
Jackson: Now, I have certain information, which was placed in my hands, of an experiment which was carried out near Auschwitz and I would like to ask you if you heard about it or knew about it. The purpose of the experiment was to find a quick and complete way of destroying people without the delay and trouble of shooting and gassing and burning, as it had been carried out, and this is the experiment, as I am advised. A village, a small village was provisionally erected, with temporary structures, and in it approximately 20,000 Jews were put. By means of this newly invented weapon of destruction, these 20,000 people were eradicated almost instantaneously, and in such a way that there was no trace left of them; that it developed, the explosive developed, temperatures of from 400 degrees to 500 degrees centigrade and destroyed them without leaving any trace at all.
Do you know about that experiment?
Speer: No, and I consider it utterly improbable. If we had had such a weapon under preparation, I should have known about it. But we did not have such a weapon. It is clear that in chemical warfare attempts were made on both sides to carry out research on all the weapons one could think of, because one did not know which party would start chemical warfare first.
Had the nuclear bomb myth been true, one might wonder why the Germans did not use their super-weapon on the enemy instead of wasting a great deal of time and valuable resources constructing a small village only to vaporize it along with their slave labor work force.
Several particularly malicious claims surfaced at the Buchenwald concentration camp which was liberated in part by United States troops on April 11, 1945. It is interesting to note that much of the evidence to support these claims, including the shrunken heads, either mysteriously vanished before the trials at Nuremberg or was not allowed to be entered as evidence. Explanations as to the origin of these claims is offered in the following documentary.
Later, Mr. Hubert was sent to Buchenwald. ''In the camp there was a cage with a bear and an eagle,'' he said. ''Every day, they would throw a Jew in there. The bear would tear him apart and the eagle would pick at his bones.'' ''But that's unbelievable,'' whispered a visitor. ''It is unbelievable,'' said Mr. Hubert, ''but it happened.''
Perhaps one of the most prolific claims associated with the holocaust that is no longer accepted as factual by any serious historian, yet is still widely believed by the general public, is that soap was manufactured from the fat of freshly killed Jews. Following is one example, though there are many more on the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM) website:
In 1941 the Germans took all of Przemysl. We were lined up with Germans aiming their guns at us. Then an officer ran up: "We need fat Jewish people for soap!" So instead of being shot, we were put on a train.
This testimony would have us believe that 1), apparently all of those that were to be shot were fat Jewish people, 2), that is was necessary to transport live victims to the soap factory rather than shooting them first, 3), that apparently Jews were in such short supply that the shooting needed to be stopped immediately, 4), that the victim who was to become a bar of soap somehow escaped their destiny and lived to tell about it, which seems odd if there was a policy to exterminate Jews and a market for soap, and 5), that shootings like this probably took place on a regular basis.
Ironically, while the people of the world are led to believe such fabrications by official and trusted institutions such as the USHMM and the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial Museum, even the Jewish Virtual Library tells us, however awkwardly, that no evidence exists to support that soap was made from human fat:
"It's a general conception that the Nazis manufactured soap," says [Michael] Berenbaum [author of The World Must Know: The History of the Holocaust as Told in the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum], who was project manager for the USHMM before it opened in 1993 and headed the museum's research institute until 1997. "But those of us working in this area have not used it as an example [of Nazi atrocity] in the last 10 to 15 years. We don't have any evidence that the Nazis actually manufactured soap with human bodies ."
When Berenbaum began putting the USHMM exhibit together, even he believed "it was obviously the case" that the Nazis produced soap from fat. "There was a question as to whether we would use soap in the exhibition," he says. But after a thorough search, he adds, "I didn't find any evidence of it . I found evidence for everything else that ... the Nazis did and worse."
There was no industrial production, and the pieces of soap inscribed R.I.F. which Jewish victims were told were made of human fat were found to contain ordinary non-organic fats (R.I.F. means Reichsstelle fuer Industrielle Fettversorgung, or State Centre for Supply of Fats, and not Pure Jewish Fat, as the victims were told by the Nazis).
Since the information offered by the USHMM, the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial Museum and the Nizkor Project lacks relevant detail, let us learn what the Institute for Historical Review (IHR) has to say regarding the soap claim and its origin:
One of the most lurid and slanderous Holocaust claims is the story that the Germans manufactured soap from the bodies of their victims. Although a similar charge during the First World War was exposed as a hoax almost immediately afterwards, it was nevertheless revived and widely believed during the Second .  More important, this accusation was "proved" at the main Nuremberg trial of 1945-1946, and has been authoritatively endorsed by numerous historians in the decades since. In recent years, though, as part of a broad retreat from the most obviously untenable aspects of the "orthodox" extermination story, Holocaust historians have grudgingly conceded that the human soap tale is a wartime propaganda lie. In their retreat, though, these historians have tried to dismiss the soap story as a mere wartime "rumor," neglecting to mention that international Jewish organizations and then Allied governments endorsed and sanctioned this libelous canard .
More recently, Jewish historian Walter Laqueur "denied established history" by acknowledging in his 1980 book, The Terrible Secret, that the human soap story has no basis in reality.  Gitta Sereny, another Jewish historian, noted in her book Into That Darkness: "The universally accepted story that the corpses were used to make soap and fertilizer is finally refuted by the generally very reliable Ludwigsburg Central Authority for Investigation into Nazi Crimes."  Deborah Lipstadt, a professor of modern Jewish history, similarly "rewrote history" when she confirmed in 1981: "The fact is that the Nazis never used the bodies of Jews, or for that matter anyone else, for the production of soap." 
In April 1990, professor Yehuda Bauer of Israel's Hebrew University, regarded as a leading Holocaust historian, as well as Shmuel Krakowski, archives director of Israel's Yad Vashem Holocaust center, confirmed that the human soap story is not true. Camp inmates "were prepared to believe any horror stories about their persecutors," Bauer said. At the same time, though, he had the chutzpah to blame the legend on "the Nazis." 
In fact, blame for the soap story lies rather with individuals such as Simon Wiesenthal and Stephen Wise, organizations like the World Jewish Congress, and the victorious Allied powers, none of whom has ever apologized for promoting this vile falsehood.
The history of the allegation can be traced back to September 1942, when Rabbi Stephen Wise (1874-1949) announced that he had received a message from an official of the World Jewish Congress in Europe reporting on the manufacture of soap and artificial fertilizer from Jewish bodies. Naturally, the report was greeted at the time with a certain amount of skepticism, since the Americans and British had already encountered such an allegation during the First World War: an allegation which had turned out to be Allied propaganda. (See Arthur Ponsonby, Falsehood in Wartime, IHR, 1980.)
Returning to Zisblatt's claims, let us learn how she managed to keep her precious diamonds hidden from the Nazis during her internment at Auschwitz and elsewhere:
Zisblatt's entire family was killed in the gas chambers, and those four diamonds were the last mementos of them. The only way Irene could keep the diamonds hidden was to swallow and retrieve them over and over again. She did this for 15 months.
Because it is likely impossible to verify whether Zisblatt's mother actually gave her any diamonds in the context of the war we cannot dismiss the claim, though there is some evidence to suggest it may have been borrowed from another story, as were virtually all of her other claims.
In a video interview we shall see shortly, Zisblatt states that she was once forced to swallow her precious diamonds immediately after retrieving them from her feces without having had a chance to clean them due to the unexpected appearance of an SS guard. She states that on other occasions the only way she could decontaminate her diamonds was to wash them in the mud, or even in the soup the prisoners were given to eat. The readily apparent problem with such claims is the probability of contracting a variety of diseases from ingesting human fecal matter, some of which can be deadly.
Next, Zisblatt repeats one of many claims that is quite popular among alleged Jewish survivors of Auschwitz:
Zisblatt told the audience how, as a young prisoner in the camps, she was a favorite of Dr. Josef Mengele, who performed experiments and surgeries on her and other prisoners without anesthesia.
There is no question that atrocities were committed by all sides, both during and after the war, which is an atrocity in and of itself, nor is it unlikely that some of these abuses consisted of medical experiments. The problem with the popular "i was a favorite of Dr. Mengele" claim is that, in a massive camp which is said to have killed 90% of the Jews whom entered it, there seems to be an unusually large number of alleged survivors who were Jewish and who were favorites of Dr. Josef Mengeleand who lived to tell about itand who do not seem to have any obvious physical defects as a result of the alleged experimentation they claim to have undergone.
We are told the infamous Dr. Josef Mengele, often referred to as the "Angel of Death", was the sadistic butcher of Auschwitz who preformed a wide variety of gruesome medical experiments, often without anesthesia, upon those he did not immediately direct to be suffocated in the gas chamber upon arrival. The real Dr. Mengele however appears to have been far less dramatic, even according to the Josef Mengele page at the Jewish Virtual Library which states:
Being a twin, regardless of age, meant survival in 1944. Some 3,000 children (or about 1,500 sets of twins) were selected for the experiments. They were not terrified of him but rather they were often intimidated by some of what he did. They knew of his temper and his passion for his work. Yet, they were also aware of his role in their survival. "Being on Mengele's list was better than being on no list," said Eva Mozes Kor.
Regarding medical experimentation, the Germans were certainly not the only ones preforming experiments upon human subjects, yet the alleged atrocities preformed by Dr. Mengele seem to be more well known than the many factual atrocities committed by governments and private industries, both of which have long and well documented histories of preforming horrific experiments upon not only individuals, but entire populations. Such experiments were often conducted without the knowledge or consent of the subjects and, in some cases, against their will. This is a widespread, ongoing phenomenon which has included cruelties such as exposure to radiation, pathogens and toxins, as well as mind control, torture and more. Following is a sampling of experiments that are known to have occurred according to a document on the Natural News website:
(1845 - 1849) J. Marion Sims, later hailed as the "father of gynecology," performs medical experiments on enslaved African women without anesthesia. These women would usually die of infection soon after surgery. Based on his belief that the movement of newborns' skull bones during protracted births causes trismus, he also uses a shoemaker's awl, a pointed tool shoemakers use to make holes in leather, to practice moving the skull bones of babies born to enslaved mothers (Brinker).
(1931) Cornelius Rhoads, a pathologist from the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, purposely infects human test subjects in Puerto Rico with cancer cells; 13 of them die. Though a Puerto Rican doctor later discovers that Rhoads purposely covered up some of details of his experiment and Rhoads himself gives a written testimony stating he believes that all Puerto Ricans should be killed, he later goes on to establish the U.S. Army Biological Warfare facilities in Maryland, Utah and Panama, and is named to the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, where he begins a series of radiation exposure experiments on American soldiers and civilian hospital patients (Sharav; Cockburn and St. Clair, eds.).
(1944) As part of the Manhattan Project that would eventually create the atomic bomb, researchers inject 4.7 micrograms of plutonium into soldiers at the Oak Ridge facility, 20 miles west of Knoxville, Tenn. ("Manhattan Project: Oak Ridge").
(1946) Gen. Douglas MacArthur strikes a secret deal with Japanese physician Dr. Shiro Ishii to turn over 10,000 pages of information gathered from human experimentation in exchange for granting Ishii immunity from prosecution for the horrific experiments he performed on Chinese, Russian and American war prisoners, including performing vivisections on live human beings (Goliszek, Sharav).
(1946 - 1947) University of Rochester researchers inject four male and two female human test subjects with uranium-234 and uranium-235 in dosages ranging from 6.4 to 70.7 micrograms per one kilogram of body weight in order to study how much uranium they could tolerate before their kidneys become damaged (Goliszek).
(1946 - 1953) The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission sponsors studies in which researchers from Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital and the Boston University School of Medicine feed mentally disabled students at Fernald State School Quaker Oats breakfast cereal spiked with radioactive tracers every morning so that nutritionists can study how preservatives move through the human body and if they block the absorption of vitamins and minerals. Later, MIT researchers conduct the same study at Wrentham State School (Sharav, Goliszek).
(1947) The CIA begins studying LSD's potential as a weapon by using military and civilian test subjects for experiments without their consent or even knowledge. Eventually, these LSD studies will evolve into the MKULTRA program in 1953 (Sharav).
(1948) Based on the secret studies performed on Newburgh, N.Y. residents beginning in 1945, Project F researchers publish a report in the August 1948 edition of the Journal of the American Dental Association, detailing fluoride's health dangers. The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) quickly censors it for "national security" reasons (Griffiths and Bryson).
(1950 - 1953) The CIA and later the Office of Scientific Intelligence begin Project Bluebird (renamed Project Artichoke in 1951) in order to find ways to "extract" information from CIA agents, control individuals "through special interrogation techniques," "enhance memory" and use "unconventional techniques, including hypnosis and drugs" for offensive measures (Goliszek).
(1950 - 1953) The U.S. Army releases chemical clouds over six American and Canadian cities. Residents in Winnipeg, Canada, where a highly toxic chemical called cadmium is dropped, subsequently experience high rates of respiratory illnesses (Cockburn and St. Clair, eds.).
(1951) The U.S. Army secretly contaminates the Norfolk Naval Supply Center in Virginia and Washington, D.C.'s National Airport with a strain of bacteria chosen because African-Americans were believed to be more susceptible to it than Caucasians. The experiment causes food poisoning, respiratory problems and blood poisoning (Cockburn and St. Clair, eds.).
(1953 - 1974) CIA Director Allen Dulles authorizes the MKULTRA program to produce and test drugs and biological agents that the CIA could use for mind control and behavior modification. MKULTRA later becomes well known for its pioneering studies on LSD, which are often performed on prisoners or patrons of brothels set up and run by the CIA. The brothel experiments, known as "Operation Midnight Climax," feature two-way mirrors set up in the brothels so that CIA agents can observe LSD's effects on sexual behavior. Ironically, governmental figures sometimes slip LSD into each other's drinks as part of the program, resulting in the LSD psychosis-induced suicide of Dr. Frank Olson indirectly at the hands of MKULTRA's infamous key player Dr. Sidney Gottlieb. Of all the hundreds of human test subjects used during MKULTRA, only 14 are ever notified of the involvement and only one is ever compensated ($15,000). Most of the MKULTRA files are eventually destroyed in 1973 (Elliston; Merritte, et al.; Barker).
(1955 - 1957) In order to learn how cold weather affects human physiology, researchers give a total of 200 doses of iodine-131, a radioactive tracer that concentrates almost immediately in the thyroid gland, to 85 healthy Eskimos and 17 Athapascan Indians living in Alaska. They study the tracer within the body by blood, thyroid tissue, urine and saliva samples from the test subjects. Due to the language barrier, no one tells the test subjects what is being done to them, so there is no informed consent (Goliszek).
(1956 - 1957) U.S. Army covert biological weapons researchers release mosquitoes infected with yellow fever and dengue fever over Savannah, Ga., and Avon Park, Fla., to test the insects' ability to carry disease. After each test, Army agents pose as public health officials to test victims for effects and take pictures of the unwitting test subjects. These experiments result in a high incidence of fevers, respiratory distress, stillbirths, encephalitis and typhoid among the two cities' residents, as well as several deaths (Cockburn and St. Clair, eds.).
(1957 - 1964) As part of MKULTRA, the CIA pays McGill University Department of Psychiatry founder Dr. D. Ewen Cameron $69,000 to perform LSD studies and potentially lethal experiments on Canadians being treated for minor disorders like post-partum depression and anxiety at the Allan Memorial Institute, which houses the Psychiatry Department of the Royal Victoria Hospital in Montreal. The CIA encourages Dr. Cameron to fully explore his "psychic driving" concept of correcting madness through completely erasing one's memory and rewriting the psyche. These "driving" experiments involve putting human test subjects into drug-, electroshock- and sensory deprivation-induced vegetative states for up to three months, and then playing tape loops of noise or simple repetitive statements for weeks or months in order to "rewrite" the "erased" psyche. Dr. Cameron also gives human test subjects paralytic drugs and electroconvulsive therapy 30 to 40 times, as part of his experiments. Most of Dr. Cameron's test subjects suffer permanent damage as a result of his work (Goliszek, "Donald Ewan Cameron").
(1958) The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) drops radioactive materials over Point Hope, Alaska, home to the Inupiats, in a field test known under the codename "Project Chariot" (Sharav).
(1963 - 1966) New York University researcher Saul Krugman promises parents with mentally disabled children definite enrollment into the Willowbrook State School in Staten Island, N.Y., a resident mental institution for mentally retarded children, in exchange for their signatures on a consent form for procedures presented as "vaccinations." In reality, the procedures involve deliberately infecting children with viral hepatitis by feeding them an extract made from the feces of infected patients, so that Krugman can study the course of viral hepatitis as well the effectiveness of a hepatitis vaccine (Hammer Breslow).
(1966) U.S. Army scientists drop light bulbs filled with Bacillus subtilis through ventilation gates and into the New York City subway system, exposing more than one million civilians to the bacteria (Goliszek).
(1967) Researchers paralyze 64 prison inmates in California with a neuromuscular compound called succinylcholine, which produces suppressed breathing that feels similar to drowning. When five prisoners refuse to participate in the medical experiment, the prison's special treatment board gives researchers permission to inject the prisoners with the drug against their will (Greger).
(1980) According to blood samples tested years later for HIV, 20 percent of all New York homosexual men who participated in the 1978 hepatitis B vaccine experiment are HIV-positive by this point (Goliszek).
(1980) The CDC continues its 1978 hepatitis B vaccine experiment in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, St. Louis and Denver, recruiting over 7,000 homosexual men in San Francisco alone (Goliszek).
(1980) The first AIDS case appears in San Francisco (Goliszek).
(1981) The CDC acknowledges that a disease known as AIDS exists and confirms 26 cases of the disease -- all in previously healthy homosexuals living in New York, San Francisco and Los Angeles -- again supporting the speculation that AIDS originated from the hepatitis B experiments from 1978 and 1980 (Goliszek).
(1982) Thirty percent of the test subjects used in the CDC's hepatitis B vaccine experiment are HIV-positive by this point (Goliszek).
(1988) The U.S. Justice Department pays nine Canadian survivors of the CIA and Dr. Cameron's "psychic driving" experiments (1957 - 1964) $750,000 in out-of-court settlements, to avoid any further investigations into MKULTRA (Goliszek).
(1990) The United States sends 1.7 million members of the armed forces, 22 percent of whom are African-American, to the Persian Gulf for the Gulf War ("Desert Storm"). More than 400,000 of these soldiers are ordered to take an experimental nerve agent medication called pyridostigmine, which is later believed to be the cause of Gulf War Syndrome -- symptoms ranging from skin disorders, neurological disorders, incontinence, uncontrollable drooling and vision problems -- affecting Gulf War veterans (Goliszek; Merritte, et al.).
(1990) The CDC and Kaiser Pharmaceuticals of Southern California inject 1,500 six-month-old black and Hispanic babies in Los Angeles with an "experimental" measles vaccine that had never been licensed for use in the United States. Adding to the risk, children less than a year old may not have an adequate amount of myelin around their nerves, possibly resulting in impaired neural development because of the vaccine. The CDC later admits that parents were never informed that the vaccine being injected into their children was experimental (Goliszek).
(1995) In the Mar. 15 President's Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (ACHRE), former human subjects, including those who were used in experiments as children, give sworn testimonies stating that they were subjected to radiation experiments and/or brainwashed, hypnotized, drugged, psychologically tortured, threatened and even raped during CIA experiments.
(1996) The Department of Defense admits that Gulf War soldiers were exposed to chemical agents; however, 33 percent of all military personnel afflicted with Gulf War Syndrome never left the United States during the war, discrediting the popular mainstream belief that these symptoms are a result of exposure to Iraqi chemical weapons (Merritte, et al.).
(2000) The U.S. Air Force and rocket maker Lockheed Martin sponsor a Loma Linda University study that pays 100 Californians $1,000 to eat a dose of perchlorate -- a toxic component of rocket fuel that causes cancer, damages the thyroid gland and hinders normal development in children and fetuses -- every day for six months. The dose eaten by the test subjects is 83 times the safe dose of perchlorate set by the State of California, which has perchlorate in some of its drinking water. This Loma Linda study is the first large-scale study to use human subjects to test the harmful effects of a water pollutant and is "inherently unethical," according to Environmental Working Group research director Richard Wiles (Goliszek, Envirnomental Working Group).
(2004) In his BBC documentary "Guinea Pig Kids" and BBC News article of the same name, reporter Jamie Doran reveals that children involved in the New York City foster care system were unwitting human subjects in experimental AIDS drug trials from 1988 to, in his belief, present times (Doran).
Video: Army Has Sprayed Citizens with Radioactive Particles!
Considering the above list of experiments inflicted upon human beings by governments and private institutions, one might find cause to reevaluate the significance of the alleged experiments conducted by Dr. Josef Mengele during World War II and question whether he is really worthy of the tile, "The Angel of Death". In a performance evaluation of Dr. Mengele prepared by the Auschwitz SS Physician's Office on 19 Aug., 1944, we read:
Dr. Mengele has an open, honest, solid character. He is absolutely reliable, upright and straightforward. He does not manifest any weakness of character, bad tendencies or cravings. His emotional and physical make-up is outstanding.
During his period of service at the Auschwitz concentration camp, he applied his practical and theoretical knowledge to combating severe epidemics. With prudence and persistent energy, and often under the most difficult conditions, he completed every assigned task to the complete satisfaction of his superiors. He showed himself capable of handling any situation. In addition, he used what little free time he had to ardently further his education as an anthropologist.
His tactful and modest deportment is that of a good soldier. Because of his demeanor, he is especially well liked by his comrades. He treats subordinates with absolute fairness and requisite severity, but is nevertheless exceptionally admired and liked.
In his behavior, work record and attitude, Dr. Mengele shows an absolutely solid and mature outlook on life. He is a Catholic. His speaking manner is spontaneous, uninhibited, convincing and lively.
Three more alleged holocaust survivors, two Jewish sisters and a German woman, all claiming to be victims of Dr. Mengele, are featured in a 1994 episode of The Phil Donahue Show featuring David Cole and his research partner Bradley Smith. Both men are well known historical revisionists who have seriously and credibly challenged the mainstream holocaust narrative and offer substantial evidence to support their theories and conclusions.
Prior to the Donahue show, Cole had produced a documentary film that was quite damaging to supporters of the homicidal gas chamber theory and which drew vicious verbal and physical attacks as well as death threats from the Jewish Defense League.
In his book, Republican Party Animal, David tells of some behind the scene events that the public wasn't privy to, including how Donahue refused to greet him prior to the show. He also tells how Donahue had planned to ambush the two revisionists by contrasting a video of David's investigation of the alleged homicidal gas chamber at Auschwitz with "the real" gas chamber in order to make fools of them both. This turned out to be a doomed effort that couldn't have failed more spectacularly when Donahue presented a clip of the "gas chamber" at Dachau (Dachau never had a homicidal gas chamber).
After returning from a commercial break and introducing my "debating partner" Dr. Michael Shermer (more on him shortly), Donahue announced that he was going to counter my footage with some clips of his own. "Let me show you this film," he solemnly told the audience. Smugly, he crowed, "I'll be curious to know what Mr. Cole feels about this." Donahue rolled his "gotcha" footage.
"Here is the gas chamber," Donahue proclaimed.
Of course, he was showing footage of the phony Dachau "gas chamber," the one that the Dachau museum itself admits was never used. Which led to this exchange:
Me: "They just showed the Dachau gas chamber in that footage. Is that gas chamber ever claimed to have killed people, or not?"
Donahue: "There"s a sign, there's a sign, at the, at Dachau, notifying tourists of that fact."
Me: "That it was not used to kill people."
Donahue (agreeing): "That it was not used."
Me (frustrated): "So why did you just show it in the clip?"
Donahue (looking nervously offstage at his staff): "Oh, I, I, I, I’m not at all sure that was Dachau."
Me (pointing at Donahue animatedly): "Wait a minute, no, wait a minute. You’re not sure that was Dachau? You show a clip on your show, and you’re not sure it was Dachau?"
As they go to commercial, you see Donahue rip off his mic and bolt up from his chair, pointing a finger at me. That’s when he called me "the antichrist."
A clip of Coles' documentary is shown on the Donahue show, though the significance of the evidence it contains is completely overlooked.
Video: The Phil Donahue Show of March 14, 1994, featuring Bradley Smith, David Cole and Michael Shermer
Much of the show focused on attacking the two revisionists rather than considering the compelling evidence and questions they presented. Most members of the audience, driven by decades of Hollywood and educational holocaust programming, a heard mentality, and devoid of critical thought, offer vigorous applause each time the two revisionists are belittled.
Dr. Michael Shermer, founder of Skeptic Magazine, was also on the guest panel of the Donahue Show. Shermer knowingly published false information about Cole which may have led to a brutal physical attack upon David in Culver City, California. Though Shermer is an exterminationist (one who believes homicidal gas chambers were used for mass extermination of the Jews), at least publicly, he did make some critically important admissions which were again ignored by both Donahue and the audience. The reason David walked off the show is explained in great detail in a speech he gave before the Institute for Historical Review in 1994.
Video: David Cole's IHR convention 1994
Also worth mentioning is that three of the alleged holocaust survivors on the show all claimed to have been experimented upon by Dr. Joseph Mengele. This cliche is virtually universal among alleged holocaust survivors who claim to have been at Auschwitz.
A German woman who called in to the show, and who also claimed to be a holocaust survivor, repeats several popular and well debunked cliches associated with the holocaust, including witnessing lampshades made from human skin and soap made from human fat. She also claimed to have witnessed people being sent to the gas chambers to be killed, stating "I saw it all".
David Cole made an earlier appearance in a 1992 episode of the Montel Williams Show along with Mark Weber, another well known Jewish revisionist and current director of the Institute for Historical Review. In contrast to the Donahue show, the debate here is focused a bit more on the evidence presented by the two revisionists and the time allotted for both sides is divided more equally. The Montel Williams Show, which would later win an Emmy, was canceled in 2008 after Montel openly criticized the media for its failure to focus attention on U.S. military personal being killed in Iraq. The Phil Donahue Show would share a similar fate even though it was one of the top rated programs on the network.
During the show we meet more alleged holocaust survivors who again repeat the typical clichés, including one women who, like Edith Glick, claims to have been quartered near a homicidal gas chamber. Once again the evidence given by the exterminationists to counter that of the revisionists is largely reduced to insults and meaningless one-liners such as "this whole discussion is crazy" and "it's completely untrue":
Video: The Montel Williams Show featuring David Cole and Mark Weber, April 27, 1999
Returning to the Miami Herald article and Irene Zisblatt, we continue with three more alleged experiments preformed by Dr. Mengele upon this incredibly fortunate woman, one of which consisted of experimenting with methods to remove the identification tattoo that was given to prisoners of Auschwitz.
"Mengele injected chemicals into her eyes in an attempt to change their color and forced her to remain in a cold room for days. He injected viruses under Zisblatt's fingernail and surgically experimented on her to find a way to remove the numbers tattooed on her arm. Afterward, he ordered the nurse to administer a lethal injection to both girls, but the nurse worked for the underground and was able to free them, one of many miracles Zisblatt experienced ."
To begin, one might envy not only Zisblatt's formidable immune system capabilities, but also her ability to survive numerous gruesome tortures at the hands of Dr. Mengele without ever having suffered any apparent physical defects. Regarding the more interesting tattoo removal feature, does it not seem odd that a camp doctor would be permitted to remove the only method by which a prisoner could be identified? Zisblatt does in fact conveniently lack this critical piece of physical evidence that could help authenticate at least part of her story. As troublesome as the missing tattoo is the fact that the identification number she claims was issued to her, 61397, was actually issued to Agnieszka Pastuszek, born Lutynia Dolna.
Was Zisblatt ever interned at Auschwitz?
There no results returned by the Auschwitz-Birkenau museum website for any of the names Zisblatt has used, including Chana Seigelstein, or just the family name of Seigelstein, or the alternate spelling, Siegelstein. Although the USHMM website does return a single result for Irene Siegelstein (note the 'i' and the 'e' are reversed), this Irene is not listed as ever having been a prisoner at Auschwitz:
Another oddity regarding Zisblatt's alleged tattoo removal is that seven to ten days of experimentation was required to develop a method to remove tattoos by Dr. Mengele in Auschwitz while Ilse Koch, over at Buchenwald, was apparently mass producing lampshades made from tattooed human skin, or so we are led to believe. One might wonder why Dr. Mengele did not have the foresight to consult with the physicians at Buchenwald rather than reinvent the wheel.
As far as managing to avoid a lethal injection because Mengeles' nurse "worked for the underground", i think i shall withhold comment on this fantasy, as well as the following quote from the Miami Herald article:
[...] although she had been given watery soup filled with chemicals to destroy her reproductive organs, she gave birth to a son and a daughter in the 1960s.
Zisblatt provides us with still more miracles in her video interviews. In the following segment she narrowly avoids being killed in the Auschwitz-Birkenau Krema III gas chamber because it was "too full" and therefore she became "stuck" in the door where she hangs on "for dear life", a detail which she altered in later accounts:
Video: HOLOHOAX - I was sent to the Gas Chamber but it was full!
Another problem with Zisblatt's account in the video above is that, had she been familiar with the building whose eaves she allegedly took refuge under, she might have excluded the part about hiding under them since this was simply not possible due to the height of the roof:
It may also be worth pondering why a mass-murdering SS guard would allow a defiant little 60 lb., four foot tall Jewish girl to interrupt his hectic extermination schedule rather than just shoot her and throw her aside.
After having avoided her appointment with death, Zisblatt tells us that she was then dragged out from under the eaves of the Krema III gas chamber and rescued from the Auschwitz concentration camp by a young Hungarian Jew whose name she cannot recall, even though she had met and talked with him previously. This extraordinarily brave young man was not only kind enough to give her his jacket to cover her naked body (and she does seem to wind up naked a lot), but he risked his own life to help her escape her appointment with the gas chamber by carrying her (apparently she was unable to walk on her own?) a considerable distance to the camp railway where he somehow managed to throw the 60 pound Zisblatt no less than 100 feet in distance over a 10 foot high barbed wire fence onto a train car that happened to be destined for another camp which, luckily for her, was not in the business of gassing Jews.
And thus Zisblatt managed to escape from the notorious Auschwitz "death camp", in broad daylight, without drawing the attention of the Germans. Overlooking the question as to why she would have chosen to remain on the train to the next camp, we might instead question how it is that she managed to gain entry in the new camp without proper documentation.
In this next clip, Zisblatt repeats the long debunked claim of lampshades made from human skin and how she narrowly avoided becoming one herself only because Ilse Koch, the "Bitch of Buchenwald" who wanted to make a lamp shade out of her, failed to show up for some reason in 1944. Apparently Zisblatt failed to realize that Ilse had been in a German prison since 1943 when she fabricated this facet of her story:
Video: HOLOCAUST - "Ilse Koch Wanted My Skin For Lampshades!"
In an article that appeared in the Gettysburg Times on 15 Jan., 1951, after the second trial of Ilse Koch we read:
Unfortunately for Irene Zisblatt and the rest of the advocates of the human skin lampshade nonsense, not a single lampshade made from human skin has ever been found and the lampshades which Ilse Koch left behind when she abandoned her Buchenwald home were found to have been made from goat skin, which is hardly surprising according to the Buchenwald Report where we are told that a nearby factory made leather products from animal skins. Following are a few quotes from General Lucius D. Clay, the interim military governor of the American Zone in Germany, after the conclusion of the first trial of Ilse Koch:
There was no convincing evidence that she had selected inmates for extermination in order to secure tattooed skins, or that she possessed any articles made of human skin.
"There was absolutely no evidence in the trial transcript, other than she was a rather loathsome creature, that would support the death sentence. I suppose I received more abuse for that than for anything else I did in Germany. Some reporter had called her the "Bitch of Buchenwald," had written that she had lamp shades made of human skin in her house. And that was introduced in court, where it was absolutely proven that the lamp shades were made out of goat skin ."
We tried Ilse Koch ... She was sentenced to life imprisonment, and I commuted it to three [four] years. And our press really didn't like that. She had been destroyed by the fact that an enterprising reporter who first went into her house had given her the beautiful name, the "Bitch of Buchenwald," and he had found some white lampshades in there which he wrote up as being made out of human flesh.
Well, it turned out actually that it was goat flesh. But at the trial it was still human flesh. It was almost impossible for her to have gotten a fair trial.
... The Germans picked her up and gave her 12 years for her treatment of her own people. But it wasn't really a war crime in the strict sense of the word.
And those are the kinds of things that we had to deal with all the time.
In this final clip we witness Zisblatt making significant alterations to her story, one regarding prisoners committing suicide by willfully walking into an electrified fence and another regarding the death of her brother:
Video: SPIELBERG LAWSUIT .Irene Weisberg Zisblatt, Caught on Tape Lying About The holocaust
Returning once more to the Miami Herald article, we learn how Zisblatt and her friend Sabka, whom she knows only by her first name, and who is one of only a few people at Auschwitz she is able to attach a name to, managed to survive after they escaped while on a forced march to another camp:
In 1945, Irene and Sabka were part of a group of 5,000 prisoners forced to march in the cold. Every day, weakened prisoners dropped dead around her. After two months, they escaped. Exhausted and covered in lice, they walked through the forest and managed to stay alive by digging up food.
Surviving in the wilderness is not a trivial task, even if only for a few days under favorable conditions. To do so during a Polish winter would require not only warm clothing, food, water and shelter, but also at least a cursory knowledge of what food is safe to eat and how to obtain these necessities. I would think a Polish winter is probably not the best time for a couple of young, starving, lice covered girls to test their survival skills, assuming they had any, yet we are told that the girls, already exhausted from "two months" of walking, somehow managed to escape and survive in these harsh conditions, fortifying themselves by digging up food (in the possibly frozen ground) and knowing what was safe to eat and what was not. Although this formidable feat is not outside the bounds of possibility, i think it must be factored in with the rest of Zisblatt's claims and weighted accordingly.
It is also worth noting that Sabka, like Zisblatt, has no record of being imprisoned at Auschwitz according to the registries i have checked, including the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial Museum database where i searched for "Sabka" both as a first name and a family name.
Far more troubling than Zisblatt's and Sabka's whereabouts during during the Second World War is the fact that many of the malicious and false claims previously discussed were used as evidence in a court of law to convict the Nazi "war criminals" during the Nuremberg Tribunals, including the human soap fallacy which was carried over from the First World War.
"For every time that I was hungry, beaten or was tortured with experiments, I was hitting back by keeping my mother's diamonds." -- Irene Zisblatt, the Miami Herald, Dec., 2008
"For every time that I was hungry, beaten or was tortured with experiments, I was hitting back by keeping my mother's diamonds." -- Irene Zisblatt, the Miami Herald, 19 Dec., 2008
Video: Special People Extraordinary Times - Irene Zisblatt
On the 19th of December, 2008, an article titled 'Holocaust survivor escaped with gems' appeared in the web edition of the Miami Herald. The article, which has since been removed from their website, encapsulated the story of Irene Weisberg Zisblatt, a Hungarian Orthodox Jew and alleged World War II holocaust survivor.
Born Chana Seigelstein in Hungary around 1931, Zisblatt remained silent for 50 years, deciding to go public with her account of suffering, torture, medical experimentation and eventual escape from the notorious Auschwitz concentration camp in Poland, after having been inspired by the Steven Spielberg film, Schindler's List. She would later appear in Spielberg's award winning documentary film, The Last Days, which was centered around five Hungarian holocaust survivors.
At the center of Zisblatt's tragic story, the complete version of which is available in her book, The Fifth Diamond, are four diamonds given to her by her mother "to be used to buy bread should she ever find herself hungry". Zisblatt is portrayed as the fifth diamond, however like many alleged holocaust survivors before her, there are many grave problems with her story.
A copy of the Miami Herald article is provided here for reference since we will be examining it rather closely:
Holocaust survivor escaped with gems BY JENNIFER COHEN Special to The Miami Herald
Her mother gave her four diamonds to be used to buy bread should she ever find herself hungry during World War II, but those diamonds gave Irene Weisberg Zisblatt the fortitude to survive the Holocaust.
"I can not buy bread with your diamonds, mother, but as long as I am alive they will stay with me," she wrote in her memoir, The Fifth Diamond: The Story of Irene Weisberg Zisblatt.
A resident of Pembroke Pines since 1990, Zisblatt recently discussed her book and appearance in Steven Spielberg's documentary, The Last Days, at Nova Southeastern University.
Born Chana Seigelstein, Zisblatt lived in Hungary with her parents and five siblings. In 1942, when she was 11, her mother, Rachel, sewed the diamonds into the hem of her skirt before she was taken by the Nazis to the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp in Poland.
Zisblatt's entire family was killed in the gas chambers, and those four diamonds were the last mementoes of them. The only way Irene could keep the diamonds hidden was to swallow and retrieve them over and over again. She did this for 15 months.
Zisblatt told the audience how, as a young prisoner in the camps, she was a favorite of Dr. Josef Mengele, who performed experiments and surgeries on her and other prisoners without anesthesia. A girl named Sabka was another of Mengele's regular victims. Though they weren't allowed to speak, they formed a friendship and Zisblatt drew strength from their bond.
"The diamonds survived because, to me, they were the strength, the hope, the courage, and my mother, so they had to survive," Zisblatt said. In having a valuable secret from the Nazis, she felt that she was defeating her torturers. "For every time that I was hungry, beaten or was tortured with experiments, I was hitting back by keeping my mother's diamonds."
Mengele injected chemicals into her eyes in an attempt to change their color and forced her to remain in a cold room for days. He injected viruses under Zisblatt's fingernail and surgically experimented on her to find a way to remove the numbers tattooed on her arm. Afterward, he ordered the nurse to administer a lethal injection to both girls, but the nurse worked for the underground and was able to free them, one of many miracles Zisblatt experienced.
"Mengele was the most good-looking man," she said. "He could have been the one scientist in the world who could have developed extraordinary things for humanity, but he became a murderer. He would look at me and smile and at times I could not believe this man could ever hurt me, he could be so charming. But the next minute, he was cutting me up into little pieces."
In 1945, Irene and Sabka were part of a group of 5,000 prisoners forced to march in the cold. Every day, weakened prisoners dropped dead around her. After two months, they escaped. Exhausted and covered in lice, they walked through the forest and managed to stay alive by digging up food.
The pair were finally liberated by Gen. George Patton's Third Army, but Sabka died the very next day. Once again, Zisblatt lost her only family. After her recovery, she was taken in by relatives in America and began a new life with a new name. She married in 1956, and although she had been given watery soup filled with chemicals to destroy her reproductive organs, she gave birth to a son and a daughter in the 1960s.
Not wanting to remember her past, Zisblatt kept her mother's diamonds in a vault. Years later, at her husband's suggestion, she had the diamonds set into a pendant in the shape of a tear drop. She does not wear them regularly -- only when she speaks to future generations.
Zisblatt had vowed that if she survived, she would be a voice for her fellow prisoners. But it was not until her son asked her about the Holocaust that she was ready to share her story.
"For 50 years, I didn't say a word. I didn't want my children to live with my pain," she said.
After taking part in the March of the Living, a walk through the camps culminating in Israel, she began to share her story to educate children in order to rid the world of prejudice and indifference, and to teach future generations about the past and what hatred can do.
"I am a survivor of man's hatred," Zisblatt said. 'We were dragged from our homes, robbed of our childhood, yanked from our mothers' arms. I was living in a factory of death."
'The Fifth Diamond: The Story of Irene Weisberg Zisblatt' is available at www.TheFifthDiamond.com
The above article appeared on the Miami Herald website just three days after Israel, the Zionist occupier of Palestine, unleashed a campaign of military terror which targeted schools, hospitals, homes and defenseless women and children within the ever shrinking, open-air prison known as the Gaza Strip. Operation Cast Lead was just another in a growing list of military actions undertaken during the course of Israel's six-plus decade slaughter of the Palestinian Arabs, whom it has been harassing, torturing, imprisoning, displacing and murdering since the end of the second World War in an effort to confiscate their land to meet the needs of the growing Jewish state. As a testament to the barbaric brutality of the Zionist settlers, the video below captures armed Israeli soldiers using rocks to break the bones of Palestinians as punishment for throwing the same, which are often the only weapons they have to defend themselves, their families, their homes, their schools and their farmlands against the constant influx of settlers and their well equipped military.
Video: Torture of Gazans :: Bone Breaking Method of Israel Soldiers
The 22 day slaughter by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) which began on December 27, 2008, incorporated the use of illegal weapons including white phosphorous and flechette shells. These barbaric weapons of mass destruction were intentionally deployed in areas occupied by civilians where they burned homes and people and sliced the flesh of anyone in their path. The civilian casualties, many of whom were women and children, made up the vast majority of the nearly 2000 victims of this particular instance of Israel's genocidal war.
In addition to subjecting the Palestinians to the more traditional weapons of war, Israel also uses them to test new weapons such as depleted uranium munitions and the "Dime bomb" which was developed by the US Air Force Research Laboratory.
As part of Israel's PR campaign to justify its U.S. backed genocide in Gaza and divert public attention from its policy of ethnic cleansing and encroachment into Palestinian land, once again the world would be browbeaten with the Jewish holocaust of World War II, this time in the form of yet another story about yet another alleged holocaust survivor whose cache of clichéd claims have been debunked decades ago.
Norman Finkelstein effectively sums up Israel's perverted use of the "holocaust card" to justify its persecution of the Palestinians during this brief and rather heated segment from a presentation given to students at the University of Waterloo in 2010, during which a naive Jewish girl displays her teary-eyed displeasure with Finkelstein's remarks:
Video: Zionism and the Holocaust Card - Dr Norman Finklestein
Though the subject of the Jewish holocaust is a sensitive one, i feel compelled to analyze Zisblatt's multifaceted story of her alleged experience in the German concentration camps of World War II, even if it is largely devoid of original content. While part of my motive is to simply examine the numerous extraordinary claims she has laid, i feel it is far more important to draw attention to the enormous historical, psychological and political impact which Zionism and the holocaust continues to have upon the world 70-plus years after the close of World War II.
Because those who question the official version of Jewish holocaust history immediately open themselves up to criminal prosecution, ridicule, defamation and labels such as anti-Semite, racist and even 'self-hating Jew' should they be Jewish, i want to make it very clear at the outset that i am not a member of any race related organization, nor do i hate any group based on religious beliefs, skin color, origin or any other common attribute, nor do i view my race as superior to another. I believe that the vast majority of people, Jewish or otherwise, are well intentioned and that the world would be a far better place if our benevolent qualities and creativity were allowed to flourish instead of being repressed by those powerful few who seem to lack even a modicum of compassion. Having said that, and where it concerns those few, extraordinarily powerful people who have unethical and criminal intentions, be they Jewish or otherwise, the gloves are off and i care not where the chips may fall in my pursuit of the truth.
Rescuing Israel: The Holocaust, takes a cold, hard look at several facets of Germany's role in World War II and the Jewish holocaust, challenging the mainstream version of this infamous historical event.
Rescuing Israel: The Holocaust, takes a cold, hard look at several facets of Germany's role in World War II, Adolph Hitler and the Jewish holocaust, challenging the mainstream version of these historical subjects. The open-minded reader will begin to understand why the historical record has been falsified and how the holocaust has been, and continues to be used to alter the course of history for economic and political gain throughout the world today, much to the determent of all humankind.
This article examines the popular claim that Adolf Hitler disarmed the German people at large in order to facilitate his goal of ridding Germany of the Jews.
Quite often i find misinformed people and the mainstream media drawing sensationalist parallels between the political climate of Hitler's Germany and that of the United States at present. 1 2 3 Though there are indeed disturbing similarities, the context in which the policies are rooted could hardly be more at odds; while Nazi Germany was essentially a police-state dictatorship, similar to that which the U.S. is devolving toward today 4 5 6, it is quite clear that the ideology driving the politics in Hitler's Germany was intended to avoid the same sort of tyranny, corruption and moral erosion which the people of the U.S. and elsewhere find themselves battling at present.
One very popular example of such a parallel asks us to compare gun control laws in the U.S. with those of Nazi Germany. Here we are led to believe that Hitler disarmed all German citizens, resulting in the slaughter of six million defenseless Jews on his way toward world domination. Those who have researched German's role in World War II beyond the history fabricated by western governments and mainstream historians however, are likely to have reached very different conclusions regarding Hitler 1, the Jewish holocaust 2, and our subject of focus here; the gun control laws in Hitler's Germany.
Many are aware of the depth to which corruption is embedded in all levels of government and how its mouthpiece, the mainstream media, falsifies, minimizes or simply omits many subjects of importance. 1 2 We know that officials cannot be blindly trusted and that our history books do not always portray an accurate account of historical events, yet many still subscribe without question to the official narrative regarding Germany's role in the Second World War, never bothering to question whether those that wrote the history may have had an agenda that would best be served by altering it.
In order to paint an accurate picture of who was disarmed and why, i think it is necessary to briefly examine the circumstances behind Hitler's rise to power, for there is a great deal more to the story than what is revealed publicly. To begin, we must put into context the mindset of the German people during the 1920's, as well as the mindset in general throughout the developed world at that time, a time during which African Americans were still being lynched in the United States. 1
Prior to World War II and before Hitler rose to power, the Jews had been expelled from approximately 67 countries including Austria, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Portugal, Prague, Russia, Spain, Switzerland and the Ukraine, sometimes more than once, and persecuted in other forms in as many more according to Jewish history. 1 Rather than automatically attributing the lengthy historical persecution of the Jews to antisemitism as many Jewish organizations would have us do, one might consider why no one wanted the Jews. The expulsion of the Jews was obviously not unique to Germany, nor was the internment of subversives and undesirables which had occurred in many countries both before and during the war. 2 3 4 5 The United States government forced Japanese, Italian and German-Americans into concentration camps during the this period, subjecting some detainees to forced labor in at least one case. 6 7 8 9
The Treaty of Versailles after World War I, which wrongly laid the blame for the war entirely upon Germany, was heavily influenced by powerful Jewish businessmen and politicians, including Louis Rothschild, Phillip Sassoon, Bernard Baruch, Stephen Wise, Paul Warburg (former Chairman of the Federal Reserve) and his brother Max Warburg. 1 The treaty succeed not only in robbing the German people of their dignity, but also in gutting the state financially and militarily, as well as dividing large portions of her land among the victors. 1 2 The erosion of German values and corruption of its political, financial and media institutions continued after the first war as Jewish politicians, lawyers and businessmen took up residence in Germany where they undermined the government and spread Marxist propaganda through the radio and print companies which they controlled. 3 German culture and morals were further assaulted by the pornography that came with the Jews, who were prominent in the industry then as they are today. 4 5 6 7 8 9
I can think of no better quote to summarize the reason for Hitler's rise to power than that which was spoken by Ernst Zündel during a 1996 interview by an Israeli journalist in which he stated that "Hitler was an organic outgrowth to Jewish behavior". 1 2 Although i have not thoroughly researched the circumstances under which the Jews had been expelled and persecuted in more than one hundred countries prior to World War II, it appears their behavior was a key factor in many instances. Certainly many of us today see the devastating impact of Zionism in Palestine 3 4 as well as the heavy handed and disproportionate influence powerful Jews wield in the worlds most important institutions, including the news media, entertainment, government, politics and finance. 5 6 7 8 9 10 Hitler had a solid insight regarding the effects that world Jewry and their central banks had upon Germany. 11
At this point i think it is important to state that it is not my intention to imply that the Jewish people as a whole are responsible for all the worlds problems, however when one considers the impact that portions of Jewish culture and ideology has, and continues to have upon various nation states, i think it is abundantly clear that this influence is responsible for a significant number of the most important problems we face, at least to some degree. Ultimately however, i think we only have ourselves to blame; we, the "99%", Jewish or otherwise, who make it possible for the "1%" to maintain power, enslave us with their monetary systems, brainwash us with their media, and send us to fight and die in lucrative wars which are engineered and financed by corrupt politicians and international bankers for reasons which seem to consist of little more than personal greed and geopolitical control. The Jewish people as a whole are also victims of these self-serving elitists, as well as any nation which has succumbed to the international bankers. Hitler planned to eliminate the threat that this sect of Jewry posed by expelling the Jewish businessmen from his country. In a broadcast to the German people in 1941, he stated in part:
This conspiracy of democratic Jews and Free Masons dragged Europe into war two years ago. Arms had to decide.
Since then a struggle has been taking place between truth and lies and, as always, this war will end in the victory for truth. In other words, whatever lies British propaganda, international world Jewry and its democratic accomplices may concoct they will not change historical facts. And it is a historical fact that for two years now Germany has been defeating one opponent after another.
I did not want it. Immediately after the first conflict I again held out my hand. I have been a soldier myself and I know how difficult it is to win a victory.
My hand was rejected. And since then we have seen that each peace offer was immediately exploited by the warmonger Churchill and his confreres so that they could say it was proof of our weakness.
In March of 1933, less than a month after Hitler was appointed chancellor and prior to his order to boycott Jewish businesses and Kristallnacht, powerful Jews declared economic war upon Germany in the form of a world-wide call to boycott German businesses, the goal of which was the complete economic destruction of the country. 1 2 3 This declaration of war occurred well before the German government began restricting the rights of Germany's Jews.
Upon economic warfare having been declared by international Jewry, it would appear that the German government had the legal right, according to international law, to confiscate the arms of a self-established enemy residing within its borders, however this confiscation would not take place for another five years when, in November of 1938, Herschel Grynszpan, a Polish Jew, assassinated Ernst vom Rath, a popular German diplomat 4 5 and thus the popular claim that all Germans were disarmed, or that Jews were illegally disarmed, are factually incorrect. While the somewhat restrictive gun control law from 1928 was left in place for the first five years after Hitler was appointed chancellor, the revised firearms law enacted by the government in 1938 actually removed or relaxed many restrictions regarding firearm ownership. Following is a summary of the gun control laws in Germany by date: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1919: Gun ownership is restricted to persons possessing a weapon or hunting license. Arrangements are made by the allies to confiscate all privately owned firearms under the threat of sanctions.
1920: The German population is to be disarmed with severe penalties for violates.
1927: Production of handguns with a barrel length of 98mm or greater and a bore of 8mm or larger is banned.
1928: The general prohibition on the acquisition of firearms is lifted, however strict provisions are made requiring separate permits to own, sell, carry and manufacture firearms and ammunition. A license is still required to own long guns.
1931: Due to the rising political crises, the acquisition of firearms and ammunition is subject to further restrictions.
1933: Nazis seize power.
1938: A weapon permit or hunting license is required for handguns only, the permit restriction for long guns is removed. The acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as well as the possession of ammunition is deregulated. The age limit for purchasing firearms is lowered from 20 to 18. Firearms permits are valid for three years instead of one. Holders of annual hunting permits, government workers and NSDAP members are no longer subject to firearm ownership restrictions. Jews are prohibited from manufacturing, dealing, possessing and carrying firearms and ammunition (violators are subject to imprisonment for up to five years).
1945: Legislative power is transferred to the Allied Military Commission.
1945-1946: All of Germany is disarmed, including the military, police and civilians. All firearms must be turned over to the nearest Allied Commander within 10 days. The maximum punishment for possession of a firearm is death.
The relaxing of the German gun laws of 1938 by Hitler's government sits in stark contrast to what we are experiencing today in the United States where there is an obvious effort to circumvent the 2nd amendment to our constitution by what many see as a criminal and tyrannical government hell-bent on widening its scope of power. While it is true that Hitler set up a fascist, police-state dictatorship, one must account for not only the reasons why he did so, but why so many Germans initially tolerated and later overwhelmingly supported him with their votes. Germany was facing an extremely desperate situation prior to Hitler as a result of severe hyperinflation and unemployment, widespread prostitution and pornography, drug use and general lawlessness. The country was also facing a very real threat of a communist takeover by the Bolshevik Jews who influenced the political, legal and educational systems, as well as the media. 1 2 3
In the early 1920's a loaf of bread cost hundreds of billions of reichsmarks and a kilogram of butter cost thousands of billions. 1 Hitler proposed real solutions to the dire problems Germany was facing and thus gained the support of the German people because he produced tangible results. In just a few short years he created millions of jobs and completely reversed the exponential downward spiral of Germany's economy at a time when much of the rest of the world was still battling the effects of the banker engineered Great Depression. 2 3 4 Most importantly, Hitler restored the dignity of the German people which had been stripped of them by the Jewish-backed power-brokers who influenced the Treaty of Versailles. These dramatic changes would not have been possible without the removal of the influential Jewish bankers, businessmen, politicians and communists. 5 The overwhelming support which Hitler came to enjoy -- an unheard of 90% at one time -- resulted in some of the largest and most enthusiastic rallies the world has ever seen. 6 Widely praised for his accomplishments by leaders and economists the world over, no nation state before or since has been able to replicate what Hitler accomplished in just a few years.
Unlike Barry Soetero and the rest of the Jewish-Zionist funded presidents that have occupied the White House after the murder of John Kennedy, Hitler's campaign did not rest on wish-washy words like "hope". Instead it rested firmly upon clear, concise goals which were met through decisive action. Hitler did not require a fleet of armored vehicles and bullet-proof barriers between himself and the admiring crowds while he spoke to and mingled with millions of Germans in the streets because nearly all of Germany and, in fact, much of the world respected and admired him. Which politician in Washington, D.C. can say the same today?
While there are indeed parallels between Hitler's Germany and the U.S. today, it is abundantly clear that the foundations of those politics could hardly be more different. There can be no comparison between the corrupt, lobbyist-fueled, weak-kneed whores who have occupied Washington, D.C. for decades and Adolf Hitler, who did not bow to the Zionist mafia or worship at the Wailing Wall while our countrymen pay the price in blood and tears and taxes and bailouts as the nation loses its sole, descending dangerously close to the conditions in Weimar Germany.