Another 9/11 "truther" debunked: David Meiswinkle

The Last American Vagabond interviewed David Meiswinkle regarding the events of 9/11, particularly regarding the collapse of the buildings. I couldn't bare to watch the whole video because Meiswinkle, who is trying to get a grand jury to consider the evidence that the official narrative is a joke, which it is, is a joke himself. I sent this email to a couple people at The Last American Vagabond. Here i am correcting a few small typos and i added a few links.

re: David Meiswinkle Interview – Ongoing Suppression Of 9/11 Truth &
Proof Of Controlled Demolition

you folks do an incredible job overall and i appreciate your work so
very much, especially you Whitney, however no one gets it right every
time and this interview with Meiswinkle is particularly disappointing

whenever i see the word "proof" used in a headline, red flags are raised
and in this case, for good reason

Meiswinkle is not a dummy and i'm sure his intentions are good, however
he is ignorant of many facts regarding 9/11, as is the 'truther'
community at large, to the point where he destroys his own credibility

here are *some* of the problems with his statements...

===

WTC 7 and "small office fires":

that is provably and laughably false - 7 burned for ~8 hrs with little
or no effort to extinguish the fires for multiple reasons, such as the
fact that many firefighters died in the collapses of the towers and
little or no water pressure due to broken lines - 7 was raging with
fires, however the "truther" community only likes to show pix of the S
side of the building which wasn't visibly burning - they don't show the
images and videos of the N side from which a massive amount of smoke was
billowing and where several fires can be seen through the windows

the morons that did the Alaska study also parrot the same bullshit
(small fires, no fires above floor 30, etc.) while anyone with a
functioning eyeball can see the fires, including fires raging far above
the 30th floor

i talked personally with a senior FDNY fireman who i spent time with at
a camp and he confirms that the building was essentially engulfed and
adds that he wasn't at all surprised that it collapsed

does this mean the NIST study is accurate regarding 7? no, not
necessarily, but it sure as hell proves that that the AL study is flawed
and that the "truther" community is made up of people who parrot
whatever source confirms their preconceived bias

i won't put links here because of the possibility of this mail being
flagged as spam, so just do a phrase search for "Possible problems with
the UAF WTC 7 collapse study" which is an article i wrote regarding the
AL study

like the NIST study, the AL study proves nothing - it is a theory and
one which is built on provably false pretenses

===

William Rodriguez - the last man out:

at least one other person exited after Rodriguez (i forget the name),
yet Rodriguez constantly promotes himself as being last which i think
raises doubts about his credibility (he was also a magician for a long
time, for whatever that's worth)

this of course does not disprove the possibility of explosions prior to
plane impact, but it is evidence that Rodriguez may not be all he seems
to be

===

credibility of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth:

Richard Gage and the Pentagon...

despite the mountains of evidence, such as the fact that HUNDREDS of
people saw a *plane* approach and/or hit the Pentagon, and no one saw it
fly away (not to mention recovered plane parts, DNA for every passenger
and crew except one baby), Gage promoted the missile bullshit for
*years*, stating that no plane could have penetrated 6 steel reinforced
concrete rings of the building

he's right .... except the plane didn't penetrate 6 walls, it punched
through TWO walls

yes, this genius -- this professional architect -- NEVER BOTHERED TO
LOOK at the design of the building! (the rings are on top of the first
floor, not at ground level where the plane largely struck)

you may have noticed that he has very quietly given up on the missile
bullshit

Gage promote that 'x' number of architects and engineers are fully on
board with A&E911, except many aren't - many have found themselves added
to their list *without their consent*

===

steel from WTC 1 & 2 was not studied, analyzed, photographed:

so the pictures of the samples collected by NIST and several other
groups and presented in their papers are.... fake? again, this is the
claim of an idiot

while we can certainly argue that the studies are flawed and that the
crime scene could have been better preserved and that there was a
massive amount of secrecy and corruption involved throughout the cleanup
and the studies, and that NIST won't release their computer models,
etc., etc., etc., no one in their right mind can claim that none of the
steel was studied

also the 'cuts' Meiswinkle refers to in the steel i suspect are the
diagonal cuts seen in photographs which are used by the "truther"
community to "prove" demolition - i worked in demolition and it's
blatantly obvious that the cuts in the ground level steel beams standing
generally upright are a) made by an oxy-accetelene torch (not thermite)
and b) are not consistent with cuts used to prepare the steel for
demolition - in other words, it appears the cuts were made during cleanup

===

WTC 7 "simultaneous" collapse:

the beams in 7 did not all give way at the same time - again, Meiswinkle
and anyone else believing this nonsense has to be blind to not see that
the W end of the penthouse collapses first, followed by the remainder of
it, followed by the exterior walls

===

i stopped the video at 12:56 when this moron starts talking about the
collapses of 1 and 2 - i guess according to Meiswinkle, the steel
should've been pounded into the ground like a nail instead of ejecting
sideways, which was the only direction it could go!

whatever - you people need to quit parroting this f'n garbage

you want answers, look to the "intelligence" community and particularly
Israel

Who is Mordechai Vanunu?

Vanunu is certainly one of the most and longest persecuted human beings on the planet. Following are some excerpts from Wikipedia...

Mordechai Vanunu (Hebrew: מרדכי ואנונו‎; born 14 October 1952),[1] also known as John Crossman,[2][3] is an Israeli former nuclear technician and peace activist[4] who, citing his opposition to weapons of mass destruction, revealed details of Israel's nuclear weapons program to the British press in 1986.[5] He was subsequently lured to Italy by the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad, where he was drugged and abducted.[5] He was secretly transported to Israel and ultimately convicted in a trial that was held behind closed doors.[5] [...]

Vanunu has been characterized internationally as a whistleblower[8][9] and by Israel as a traitor.[10][11][12][13] Daniel Ellsberg has referred to him as "the preeminent hero of the nuclear era".[14] In 1987, he was awarded the Right Livelihood Award for "his courage and self-sacrifice in revealing the extent of Israel's nuclear weapons programme."

[...]

A number of prohibitions were placed upon Vanunu after his release from jail and are still in force:

he shall not leave Israel
he shall not speak to any foreigner unless granted approval to do so by Shin Bet[88] he shall not come within 550 yards of a border crossing or airport[89] he shall not come within 100 yards of a foreign embassy[89] his phone and Internet use shall be subject to monitoring[90] he shall notify authorities of any change in his place of residence, and whom he intends to meet[91] [...]

In 2006, Amnesty International's British branch chief, Kate Allen, wrote that Microsoft handed over the details of Vanunu's Hotmail email account by alluding that he was being investigated for espionage. This happened before a court order had been obtained.[95] [...]

Yossi Melman, an Israeli journalist, wrote in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz "Vanunu's harassment by the Israeli government is unprecedented and represents a distortion of every accepted legal norm."[85] Vanunu was denied parole at a hearing in May 1998.[108] Five years later, parole was again refused. At this parole hearing, Vanunu's lawyer Avigdor Feldman maintained that his client had no more secrets and should be freed. But the prosecution argued that the imminent war with Iraq would preclude his release. After the hearing, Feldman said, "The prosecutor said that if Vanunu were released, the Americans would probably leave Iraq and go after Israel and Israel's nuclear weapons - which I found extremely ridiculous." The real force blocking Vanunu's release, who had been known only as "Y", was exposed in 2001 as Yehiyel Horev, the head of Mossad's nuclear and military secrets branch.[109]

Following his release in 2004, Vanunu appeared in Israeli courts on numerous occasions on charges of having violated the terms of his release. He was arrested and detained for attempting to go to Bethlehem, on at least one occasion his room in St. George's Cathedral was raided by policemen and his belongings were confiscated.[110]

Yehiel Horev, the strictest of all the security chiefs in Israel, especially in regard to the protection of institutions such as the Shimon Peres Negev Nuclear Research Center and the Israel Institute for Biological Research, is apprehensive that if Vanunu goes abroad, he will continue to be a nuisance by stimulating the public debate over Israel's nuclear policy and the nuclear weapons he says Israel possesses.

[...]

In September 2004, Vanunu received the LennonOno Grant for Peace, a peace prize founded by artist and musician Yoko Ono in memory of John Lennon, her late husband.[citation needed]

In December 2004, he was elected by the students of the University of Glasgow to serve for three years as Rector.[155] On 22 April 2005, he was formally installed in the post but could not carry out any of its functions as he was still confined to Israel. The Herald newspaper launched a campaign for his release.[156]

In 2005 he received the Peace Prize of the Norwegian People (Folkets fredspris).[157] Previous recipients of this prize include Vytautas Landsbergis (1991), Alva Myrdal (1982), Mairead Maguire and Betty Williams. On 24 February 2010, Nobel Institute Director, Geir Lundestad, announced that for the second year in a row, Mordechai Vanunu had declined the honour of being nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.[citation needed]

On 21 September 2010, the Teach Peace Foundation recognized Mordechai Vanunu for his courageous actions to halt the development and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction by the Israeli government.[158]

On 4 October 2010, the International League for Human Rights announced that Vanunu was awarded the Carl von Ossietzky Medal for 2010[159] and, on 16 November, sent open letters to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defence Minister Ehud Barak and Interior Minister Eli Yishai, seeking Vanunu's free departure out of Israel to allow him to receive the medal at the Award Ceremony in Berlin on 12 December 2010.[160] Nobel laureates cited as co-signatories to the letter include Mairead Maguire, Günter Grass, Harold W. Kroto and Jack Steinberger.

The request was refused and the 12 December Berlin medal ceremony was restyled as a protest event in support of Vanunu and nuclear disarmament. On this occasion a musical composition, The Dove,[161] was dedicated to Vanunu and given its premier performance.[162]

Coronavirus and Continuity Of Government by Whitney Webb

This is an extended excerpt from yet another outstanding piece of real journalism by Whitney Webb, published as Coronavirus: What Newsweek Failed to Mention About "Continuity of Government" on Global Research. Please be sure to read the full article.

Given the context of the current coronavirus crisis, the DOJ’s recent request for sweeping new powers and the role of Main Core in COG plans, one part of Barr’s pre-crime memorandum stands out. In the part of the document where Barr outlines what actions will be taken once an individual is deemed potentially violent or threatening, he writes that those individuals will be subject to detention, court-ordered mental health treatment and electronic monitoring, among other measures.

The possibility of pre-crime detention was also present in the DOJ’s recent request for new “emergency powers” in light of the coronavirus crisis, as it specifically asks that those new powers apply to “any statutes or rules of procedure otherwise affecting pre-arrest, post-arrest, pre-trial, trial, and post-trial procedures in criminal and juvenile proceedings and all civil process and proceedings.” Norman L. Reimer, executive director of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, told Politico that the inclusion of the term “pre-arrest” likely means that “you could be arrested and never brought before a judge until they decide that the emergency or the civil disobedience is over. I find it absolutely terrifying.”

Thus, if DOJ is granted these new powers it has requested, the William Barr-led Department of Justice will not only be authorized to indefinitely detain Americans without trial, it will be able to detain them without any proof of those detainees having committed a crime or even having plans or the intent to commit a crime. Instead, the DOJ only needs to argue that the individual was “mobilizing towards violence,” an extremely vague phrase that could potentially be used against anyone who expresses discontent with the government or government policy.

Furthermore, with the FBI having recently flagged “conspiracy theorists” (and by extension those who distrust or question government narratives of both past and present) as a “domestic terror threat,” the DOJ could even make the case that failure to blindly trust government narratives presents a threat to the public order. Given that the Main Core database in its current form contains bulk surveillance gathered from social media, phone conversations/messaging apps and even financial information (i.e. purchasing history, etc.) on Americans deemed unfriendly “often for the slightest and most trivial reason,” this unprecedented power grab by the DOJ has an authoritarian and Orwellian potential to target legitimate dissent like never before.

War with Iran? The Trump/neocon/Zionist gift to the world

(U//FOUO) DHS-FBI-NCTC Bulletin: Escalating Tensions Between the United States and Iran Pose Potential Threats to the Homeland | Public Intelligence

Page Count: 3 pages
Date: January 8, 2020
Restriction: For Official Use Only
Originating Organization: Department of Homeland Security, Federal Bureau of Investigation, National Counterterrorism Center
File Type: pdf
File Size: 310,432 bytes
File Hash (SHA-256): 3F6969337413905B2E197F61EB9A8C1D3BCEFF323F84FC1573C679805EFC7F85

(U//FOUO) This Joint Intelligence Bulletin (JIB) is intended to assist federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial counterterrorism, cyber, and law enforcement officials, and private sector partners, to effectively deter, prevent, preempt, or respond to incidents, lethal operations, or terrorist attacks in the United States that could be conducted by or on behalf of the Government of Iran (GOI) if the GOI were to perceive actions of the United States Government (USG) as acts of war or existential threats to the Iranian regime. The GOI could act directly or enlist the cooperation of proxies and partners, such as Lebanese Hizballah. The FBI, DHS, and NCTC had assessed any kinetic retaliatory attack would first occur overseas. In the event the GOI were to determine to conduct a Homeland attack, potential targets and methods of attack in the Homeland could range from cyber operations, to targeted assassinations of individuals deemed threats to the Iranian regime, to sabotage of public or private infrastructure, including US military bases, oil and gas facilities, and public landmarks. USG actions may also provoke violent extremist supporters of the GOI to commit attacks in retribution, with little to no warning, against US-based Iranian dissidents, Jewish, Israeli, and Saudi individuals and interests, and USG personnel.

(U//FOUO) Immediate Response in Homeland Could Take Form of Cyber Operations

(U//FOUO) The FBI, DHS, and NCTC assess an immediate GOI response in the Homeland could take the form of attempted cyber operations against USG facilities and networks, including US military systems, and critical private sector functions, given that such operations could be attempted by Iran-based cyber actors without the necessity of establishing a US presence. The US Intelligence Community has assessed that Iran continues to prepare for cyber attacks against the United States and allies. It is capable of causing localized, temporary disruptive effects during a cyber attack on victim networks. Historically, Iran has shown the capability to carry out disruptive and destructive cyber attacks against public and private business networks, such as extended distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) campaigns and data deletion attacks.

(U//FOUO) Iran represents a cyber espionage and attack threat, using increasingly sophisticated cyber techniques and attempting to deploy cyber capabilities that would enable attacks against critical infrastructure in the United States. Tehran’s overall risk calculus for a cyber response likely will change based on the US strike, which Iranian leaders have vocally portrayed as escalatory, and offensive cyber operations are likely to be considered as retaliatory options. Malicious activity and reconnaissance may not necessarily occur from Iranian Internet Protocol (IP) space, as actors may use midpoint infrastructure in other countries. As such, traffic from Iranian IP addresses may not be indicative of malicious activity. The FBI, DHS, and NCTC stress good cyber hygiene such as patching systems and educating personnel to guard against commonly used cyber actor techniques such as social engineering and spear-phishing.

(U//FOUO) Potential for GOI-Directed Lethal Attacks in the Homeland

(U//FOUO) In recent years, the USG has arrested several individuals acting on behalf of either the GOI or Lebanese Hizballah who have conducted surveillance indicative of contingency planning for lethal attacks in the United States against facilities and individuals.

» (U//FOUO) An agent of the GOI arrested in 2018 had conducted surveillance of Hillel CenterUSPER and Rohr Chabad CenterUSPER, Jewish institutions located in Chicago, including photographing the security features surrounding the Chabad Center.

» (U//FOUO) Three Lebanese Hizballah External Security Organization (ESO) operatives arrested between 2017 and 2019 had conducted surveillance of US military and law enforcement facilities, critical infrastructure, private sector venues, and public landmarks in New York City, Boston, and Washington, DC.

(U//FOUO) The GOI also has a history of conducting assassinations and assassination attempts against individuals in the United States it deems a threat to the Iranian regime. The GOI assassinated the US-based former spokesman for the Shah of the Iran in 1980 and plotted to assassinate the Saudi Arabian ambassador to the United States in 2011. In August 2018, the USG arrested two individuals for acting as agents of the GOI by conducting covert surveillance of Iranian dissidents in New York City and Washington, DC, and the aforementioned security features of Jewish facilities in Chicago.

Featured documentary: The Jewish Question V1 by Love Life and Anarchy

This video was recommended by a reader and i think it's great. It's very dense with information and less biased than i expected which is nice to see.

The Jewish Question V1 [Crucifixion, Holocaust, Israel]

A presentation on European history and its resulting effects on the Jewish community. With special focus on world renowned Jewish intellectuals, the religious conflicts between Judaism and Christianity, European politics in the 20th century, World War 2, The Holocaust, Israel and how it is all connected to current world affairs.