America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) spoke to former Pfizer Vice President and Chief Science Officer Dr. Mike Yeadon about his views on the COVID-19 vaccine, hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, the regulatory authorities, and more.
At the outset, Dr. Yeadon said “I’m well aware of the global crimes against humanity being perpetrated against a large proportion of the worlds population. “I feel great fear, but I’m not deterred from giving expert testimony to multiple groups of able lawyers like Rocco Galati in Canada and Reiner Fuellmich in Germany.
“I have absolutely no doubt that we are in the presence of evil (not a determination I’ve ever made before in a 40-year research career) and dangerous products. “In the U.K., it’s abundantly clear that the authorities are bent on a course which will result in administering ‘vaccines’ to as many of the population as they can. This is madness, because even if these agents were legitimate, protection is needed only by those at notably elevated risk of death from the virus. In those people, there might even be an argument that the risks are worth bearing. And there definitely are risks which are what I call ‘mechanistic’: inbuilt in the way they work.
“But all the other people, those in good health and younger than 60 years, perhaps a little older, they don’t perish from the virus. In this large group, it’s wholly unethical to administer something novel and for which the potential for unwanted effects after a few months is completely uncharacterized. “In no other era would it be wise to do what is stated as the intention. “Since I know this with certainty, and I know those driving it know this too, we have to enquire: What is their motive?
“While I don’t know, I have strong theoretical answers, only one of which relates to money and that motive doesn’t work, because the same quantum can be arrived at by doubling the unit cost and giving the agent to half as many people. Dilemma solved. So it’s something else.
Appreciating that, by entire population, it is also intended that minor children and eventually babies are to be included in the net, and that’s what I interpret to be an evil act.
“There is no medical rationale for it. Knowing as I do that the design of these ‘vaccines’ results, in the expression in the bodies of recipients, expression of the spike protein, which has adverse biological effects of its own which, in some people, are harmful (initiating blood coagulation and activating the immune ‘complement system’), I’m determined to point out that those not at risk from this virus should not be exposed to the risk of unwanted effects from these agents.”
We now have multiple reports of schools shutting down because so many teachers are vaccine injured. We also have several reports of mass casualty events in nursing homes following 'rona vaccination. Combine that with the new VAERS data that just posted today. We have a problem.… https://t.co/jvtBRnUnZd
CDC illegally inflated the COVID fatality number by at least 1,600 percent as the 2020 presidential election played out, according to a study published by the Public Health Initiative of the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge. The study, "COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective," was authored by Henry Ealy, Michael McEvoy, Daniel Chong, John Nowicki , Monica Sava, Sandeep Gupta, David White, James Jordan , Daniel Simon, and Paul Anderson."
It's been known by many since Israel-loving Beijing Biden was "elected" with more votes than any other president in history, that YouTube has been removing down-votes from White House videos. While it is transparently obvious that the vast majority of people, and even many on the left, strongly dislike the war-mongering demented pedophile, and have been expressing their sentiments in large numbers by down-voting each and every video the White House uploads, YouTube clearly wants the world to imagine otherwise.
I've seen screenshots of YouTube modifying dislikes of White House videos. I decided I would do a thorough analysis myself. I wrote a script to check video stats every 80 seconds for 24 hours – for all videos on White House's YouTube channel.
Zoe tells us that many other videos were simply removed (delisted) within minutes of being published.
Following are more examples of down-vote manipulation by YouTube.
Zoe uploaded some of the collected to Pastebin, including a data set that contains the number of dislikes that were removed from the videos, as well as the times at which they were removed. This data tells us that 130,000 dislikes were removed in just 24 hours.
The disgust people feel regarding ding-dong Biden is also apparent on the White House videos hosted at BitChute, a popular YouTube alternative. Unlike YouTube, there is far less censorship at BitChute and, we might assume, no manipulation of voting statistics. A BitChute user created the channel, TheWhiteHouse, which i assume is not an official White House channel, but which seems to mirror the White House videos posted at YouTube. If Zoe's statistics are accurate, we might expect to find a similar result regarding user sentiment for the White House videos on BitChute, minus the vote manipulation, and indeed we do.
Judges without a shadow of a doubt declared that the coronavirus was "created by a criminal elite that rules the world."
In particular, the document cites financial investor George Soros, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates and the Rockefeller family of billionaires, whom he accuses of "managing" and "continuing to direct" the virus into the "new world order."
Gibraltar is a British Colony at the southern tip of the Iberian Peninsula attached to the country of Spain. It's population is just over 30,000 people, and it is best known for its huge "rock," the "Rock of Gibraltar."
I have been contacted by residents in Gibraltar stating that 53 people have died in 10 days immediately following the roll out of injections of the Pfizer mRNA COVID injections, and calling it a "massacre."
Local media reports confirm the deaths, but blame them on COVID, and not the COVID injections.
However, prior to the roll out of the injections, it is reported that only 16 people in total died "from COVID" since the beginning of the "pandemic" about a year ago.
SEATTLE, Jan. 29, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- A paper was published today by Dr. Steven Quay, M.D., PhD., CEO of Atossa Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: ATOS), entitled, "A Bayesian analysis concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory derived."
Shortly after 20+ thousand National Guardsmen helped install the most popular president in history in the barbwire-topped fenced-in White House, three things occurred regarding the "novel" corona virus: CNN removed its super scary case statistics from its news casts, the World Health Organization lowered the PCR threshold and the Lancet medical journal decided that, wouldn't you know it, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is an effective treatment after all, just like thousands of doctors and scientists have been screaming all along in the deaf ears of social media.
"In case of virus detection, >35 cycles only detects signals which do not correlate with infectious virus as determined by isolation in cell culture [reviewed in 2]; if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the case in most laboratories in Europe & the US), the probability that said person is actually infected is less than 3%, the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%"
In an "inauguration" of its own while Joe Biden was being sworn into office, the World Health Organization (WHO) initiated new rules regarding the PCR assays used for testing for COVID-19.
Even though they've been widely used across the U.S. and around the world to determine who has a positive case of COVID, PCR assays are not designed to be used as diagnostic tools, as they can't distinguish between inactive viruses and "live" or reproductive ones.
Besides that, previously, the WHO had recommended 45 "amplification" cycles of the test to determine whether someone was positive for COVID or not.
The thing is, the more cycles that a test goes through, the more likely that a false positive will come up — anything over 30 cycles actually magnifies the samples so much that even insignificant sequences of viral DNA end up being magnified to the point that the test reads positive even if your viral load is extremely low or the virus is inactive and poses no threat to you or anyone else.
On a national level, just eyeballing the data makes this clear. Countries that have implemented harsh lockdowns shouldn't expect to have comparatively lower numbers of covid-19 deaths per million.
In Italy and the United Kingdom, for example, where lockdowns have been repeatedly imposed, death totals per million remain among the worst in the world. Meanwhile, in the United States, states with with the most harsh lockdown rules—such as New York, New Jersey, and Massachusetts are among the states with the worst total deaths.
Lockdown advocates, of course, are likely to argue if researchers control for a variety of other variables, then we're sure to see that lockdowns have saved millions of lives. Yet research keeps showing us this simply isn't the case.
The latest study to show the weakness of the prolockdown position appeared this month in the European Journal of Clinical Investigation, authored by Eran Bendavid, Christopher Oh, Jay Bhattacharya, and John P.A. Ioannidis. Titled "Assessing Mandatory Stay-at-Home and Business Closure Effects on the Spread of COVID-19," the authors compare "more restrictive non-pharmaceutical interventions" (mrNPI) and "less restrictive non-pharmaceutical interventions" (lrNPI). More restrictive interventions include mandatory stay-at-home orders and forced business closures. Less restrictive measures include "social distancing guidelines, discouraging of international and domestic travel, and a ban on large gatherings." The researchers compare outcomes at the subnational level in a number of countries, including England, France, Germany, Iran, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, and the United States. This is then compared against countries with less restrictive measures, primarily Sweden and South Korea, where stay-at-home orders and business closures were not widely implemented.
"We find no clear, significant beneficial effect of mrNPIs on case growth in any country …In none of the 8 countries and in none out of the 16 comparisons (against Sweden or South Korea) were the effects of mrNPIs significantly negative (beneficial). The point estimates were positive (point in the direction of mrNPIs resulting in increased daily growth in cases."
As President Biden signs a national mask mandate into law, measures being imposed in the name of protecting public health could create a humanitarian crisis that sees Americans sued by the state and forced into detention camps for breaking pandemic protocols.
Older readers familiar with the more prominent names in truth seekers engaged in honest mediine know well the gaunlet which Dr Wakefield was subjected to back in the 90s after he published a very important paper in the Lancet (soon withdrawn by Big Pharma pressure) that linked the undeniable evidence of a link between vaccines and autism. As usual, the attack dogs of Big Medicine did everything possible to destroy Wakefield's life for daring to expose the truth about vaccines and autism. He now focuses on making documentaries
This sit down interview with Sucharit Bhakdi about the current situation we find ourselves in. He is the most cited microbiologist in German academic history, an authority if there ever was one Shocked by the events of this year, he is speaking out about the scientific fallacies and human rights abuses at work now.
Sucharit Bhakdi was born in Washington, DC, and educated at schools in Switzerland, Egypt, and Thailand. He studied medicine at the University of Bonn in Germany, where he received his MD in 1970. He was a post-doctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics in Freiburg from 1972 to 1976, and at The Protein Laboratory in Copenhagen from 1976 to 1977. He joined the Institute of Medical Microbiology at Giessen University in 1977 and was appointed associate professor in 1982. He was named chair of Medical Microbiology at the University of Mainz in 1990, where he remained until his retirement in 2012. Dr. Bhakdi has published over three hundred articles in the fields of immunology, bacteriology, virology, and parasitology, for which he has received numerous awards and the Order of Merit of Rhineland-Palatinate. Sucharit Bhakdi and his wife, Karina Reiss, live with their three-year-old son, Jonathan Atsadjan, in a small village near the city of Kiel.
As health officials strive to brush off as "coincidences" the mounting number of deaths and other serious adverse reactions occurring worldwide in connection with Pfizer's and Moderna's experimental mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, the need for independent scrutiny of vaccine safety data has never been more apparent.
A new peer-reviewed study about adverse events following immunization (AEFI) and the measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) vaccine brings home the urgent need for independent research.
The study, published by two northern Italian researchers on an open access platform suggests that most existing safety monitoring systems, whether in Italy or the U.S., are "utterly inadequate to document the real incidence of serious AEFIs and that current methods of assessing [vaccine-related] causality may be questioned."
The study also reveals how an unbiased reanalysis of adverse event data puts the lie to the "reassuring conclusions" officials like to disseminate about vaccine safety.
Late last week, 21WIRE reported that Chinese health experts called for Norway and other countries to suspend the use of the experimental mRNA vaccine made by controversial Big Pharma manufacturers Pfizer and Moderna, following related deaths of at least 23 elderly recipients, according to Global Times.
Have Western authorities rushed the vaccine issue to suit the 'raging pandemic' narrative?
A mRNA vaccine like the several Covid-19 vaccines currently being trialed has never been used on humans. Such vaccines have been only been trialed in animals. In those studies, antibody responses initially looked promising, similar to claims in the current human trials. However, the animal trials eventually proved unsuccessful, with one study in ferrets resulting in an increased number of mutated genes, cancer rates, autoimmune responses, and death.
And if a vaccine elicits an immune response that misses the target, the result could potentially be worse than if no vaccine was given, according to an Australian professor. "One of the problems with corona vaccines in the past has been that when the immune response does cross over to where the virus-infected cells are it actually increases the pathology rather than reducing it," Professor Ian Frazer of the University of Queensland says. This could manifest in inflammation in the lungs which would not have occurred if a vaccine was not administered.
Usually, it takes ten years or more to develop a new vaccine but the Covid-19 vaccines have been rushed to market in a matter of months. The vaccines are being trialed on humans without with barely being tested on animals. An Australian organization tested ferrets in a short-term study earlier in the year. Governments enabled vaccine manufacturers to fast track the process due to the so-called emergency status of the Covid-19 crisis. Operation Warp Speed in the United States pledges that safety will not be sacrificed in the accelerated vaccine development. However, some medical professionals and vaccine safety advocates are concerned about the possible long-term effects of these vaccines, which often take years to manifest. See Vaxxter contributor and investigative reporter James Grundvig's article The Real Meaning Behind Operation Warp Speed.
Blockbuster conversation with Dr. Carrie Madej exposing the fact that the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-vaccine is experimental in nature, has not been properly tested in humans, has not been proven safe and effective (she explains closely how the raw data has been manipulated), and raises many questions regarding dangerous side-effects and adverse events, including death, as well as pointing to the genetic reprogramming of human cells without informed consent provided to those who take it: this is a transhumanizing and nanobot-containing vaccine, but people do not seem to understand this; given the multiple numbers of adverse effects being reported, she calls for an immediate moratorium to halt the rollout and calls for medical professionals to speak out.
12bytes says: Following is a copy of the auto-generated subtitles from the YouTube copy of the video. Because it is auto-generated there will be many errors, however it may still be useful for searching.
so good afternoon everyone and welcome this is Ramola D from Ramola D Reports and i'm here as you as you can tell with a very well known doctor and researcher dr Carrie Madej who's really become quite famous worldwide because of the great disclosure she's been giving everybody about the mrna vaccines and talking about uh the entire covet plantermic pandemic whatever you want to call it um and we're here today to talk a little bit in depth about vaccines i'm particularly excited about speaking with dr kirima day today because she is a specialist or researcher specialist in the field of vaccines dr Carrie Madej directed two large medical clinics in the state of georgia usa and looking at her bio at stopworldcontrol.com i read that she's been fascinated by vaccines from from her twenties onwards studied them ever since and her in-depth research led her to discover what the proposed technologies are for the new covert 19 vaccines and as everyone knows what she's revealing is alarming and um you know what she's talking about really is how these new vaccines can alter our dna turning us into hybrids connect humans to artificial intelligence and global control networks um kicking off transhumanists and turning us into humans 2.0 and these are a rather frightening topics and certainly we all need to have a say in our future as humanity so for that reason uh you know we need to have the knowledge at our fingertips so i'm very um so grateful um that dr Carrie made speaking out as our other doctors today and i want to welcome you to the show thank you so much for being here carrie thank you for thank you ramola i'm very happy to be here very happy to help share this knowledge and um educate people as much as we can time is of the essence right now this is our window of opportunity to take action thank you i guess you know you must have also been following the news because now at this point in time we have a situation where the vaccines have been rolled out people are actually taking the vaccines right yeah yes obviously there are many many concerns that you have pointed out um you know it's almost as if you almost you are repeating your message but so i feel a little bad about asking you to repeat repeat the main points over here but um you know your voice is powerful and very much needed as a specialist and an ex expert at this time so did you want to tell us briefly what exactly is so problematic and concerning about these mrna vaccines um well to begin with these other these vaccines are completely experimental on the human race it's such an experiment that right now honestly by by all science and all legalities every single person taking a vaccine is now a research participant there is no clinical study that has been completed not one of them will be completed until october of 2021. that means every single person that takes any shot is now a research participant that means that not one person not one entity not one government can ever tell you what to expect we don't know we really don't know we need the whole experiment to go through so we're in a grand experiment on top of that they're introducing minimum of two brand new technologies into the human body that has never been launched or released on such a large population of people so we have the experiment and then we have two new technologies being introduced um on top of that we have um you know some substances inside the vaccine there are so many things to go over as you know but many substances substances in the vaccine that can not only alter our dna our genetic code but also introduce artificial intelligence nanotechnology into the body and some other substances like polyethylene glycol that can be very allergenic to people that we're seeing problems right now so there's many things to go over and not only the research is showing that this has a lot of risk but also the meetings that i attended previously um their business and their scientific meetings when they were going over the intent of these vaccines in my opinion it was not for the good of the whole it was not for the good of humanity it was more about control and surveillance of people and it's because of knowing that intent and then also knowing the ingredients and the the risks involved that i've been warning everybody and alarming everyone so i don't know which one you want to start with first there wow that's a brilliant sort of summary and condensation of all of the many many problems associated with it let's start with what you first mentioned with the fact that this is experimental and everybody who's taking it is a research participant voluntarily or involuntarily i mean are people being told this do people know this absolutely not i i've been traveling around the us recently and just talking to all kinds of people and i can tell you that their understanding of the vaccine is that it is proven to be safe and effective and those are both false absolutely a hundred percent those are false to begin with there's the two manufacturers pfizer and modana moderna that are approved for use in the united states and by emergency use so those two companies have been researching the vaccine so far and in their endpoints what they're studying for a successful vaccine are only two endpoints one is does it prevent you from having a positive pcr test the second is does it prevent you from having one symptom that's it only one symptom so for preventing you from having a fever or cough it's successful that is it those are the only two endpoints they're studying so when they say it's successful it's based on that now everybody's scared of cover 19 they're scared of dying you're scared of going to hospital they're scared of catching it they do not look at does it prevent transmission or you being contagious it doesn't look at that it does not look at does it prevent people from dying doesn't look at that it does not look at does it prevent you from going to the hospital or icu doesn't look at that okay so the benefits are very minuscule and by the admission of the manufacturers they admit that the probably they're assuming only assuming that the immunity from the vaccines could only last two months after the second shot that's it no more so if it's only two months maybe of partial immunity that's all you're getting that's not very much benefit right so then look at the risk because a doctor should look at the benefits versus the risk and this is the little information we know the what we know now are the short-term effects intermediate and long-term effects to expect so short term well we know now and you've probably people probably heard around the news that there's been allergic reactions anaphylactic reactions happening so much so that people in the uk or the institutions are now putting resuscitation units next to where they're administering the vaccines that means people are actually going into a state of needing resuscitation meaning bring back to life okay you're dying from the vaccine within minutes i honestly don't know of any other vaccine that ever works in that manner or has that side effect so we have that and that's due to the polyethylene glycol that's what we're assuming in the vaccine right yeah because 70 percent of people go ahead 70 percent of people are allergic go ahead finish i just said uh we know that about 70 of people can be allergic to that that's an incredible number huh we need to talk about that absolutely can we just um go back a little bit because i wanted to simply emphasize the points that you're making over here you're talking about benefits versus risks and you're talking about the relative safety of this vaccine people that you've spoken to imagine that the vaccine is safe but basic ones and then the suppression of symptoms it sounds like and then the the vaccine is actually able to do that pfizer is able to say i didn't hear that last part you froze on me so could you repeat the last part yeah i was gonna no worries no this is happening i'm so sorry this is uh we are being hacked but um yeah oh power for the course apparently so it sounds like what f the fisa vaccine is doing what it can ensure is basically two or three things and one of those is it ensures a partial immunity for two months it suppresses the symptoms and it ensures that you won't get a positive pcr test is that all that that they can uh that that's all they're looking at for endpoints right now and you have to understand when they're saying that that is what they're seeing as the benefit well we have very little data on that because again we're inside the middle of the experiment at the end of the experiment maybe they would see none of those are true because we have to see the whole experiment in its entirety the other problem is that they're not being honest with how they're accumulating that data how they're presenting it to us and i'll give you an example um we need to look at all the raw data raw data means this is this person and this is what happened to them and you can go down the list that's raw data right um well in in modern and pfizer studies they um were publishing to like the new england journal of medicine saying their preliminary studies you know and they had maybe 45 patients well if you look at the raw data it was showing many more patients were in that study so they took out omitted some patients before they presented their research in the research article that's so unethical and so what i saw they were doing is they had taken out the elderly patients the ones that were 65 and up and why they did it it's quite obvious because if you look at the raw data that i was able to get so far the people in that study group most of them could not get the second vaccine in fact anyone over 70 did not they just said in quotations lost to follow-up they didn't say or they were just angry not to take it or maybe they died we don't know we don't know what happened to all of them and so what they did is they presented their research and say okay we had 18 year old to a 60 year old in the trial no that's not true they had many more that were older than that and they just took them out so they wouldn't be part of the study that is such horrible manipulation of the data it's lying as outright lying to the public and to other scientists and doctors so people need to understand that we are being lied to on many levels and the data is being manipulated at the largest extent that's just what i could figure out from the little information i have received what if we got all of the raw data i could imagine there's going to be a lot more than that also if you look at their parameters for what do they exclude as a side effect or as an adverse reaction from the vaccine in many instances they're saying that death is going to be excluded as an adverse reaction they actually are saying cardiovascular events will be excluded as an adverse reaction are you kidding me because they're assuming that a cardiovascular reaction won't be from the vaccine what they're also giving just short time frames for the adverse reactions okay nothing past this point will be coming from our vaccine they're cherry picking everything apart and so the bias of the studies will show that it's it's it's a good vaccine when it's not a good vaccine and this is what if they gave us all the data people need to understand they're not allowing us to look at all the data to be real critical thinkers and look at this and it's quite frightening and i'm very disappointed in my colleagues because they're not reading the research themselves not all of them but a large number of them they're just saying well the conclusion says it's a success you know you have to read the whole the whole article to see um you know where did the patients study where were the patients were they really and what are they studying what are the end points all these things are they lying about their stats usually you have to go through and make sure the statistician did a good job many times you'll see that the statistician made mistakes so you don't take my point to you is yeah that no you're supposed to studies are done very very poorly sorry i think we're both being frozen very poorly so far the studies being done very poor yeah sorry i don't mean to talk over you i think what's happening is we're being frozen at different times and it sounds like we're stepping on each other not intentional so uh just to let our viewers know you know we're not stepping on each other's stores over here so um so wow that is huge information as far as i can tell basically you're saying the data is being manipulated the raw data is being somewhat obscured and it's being reformed and presented in a wrongful way there's an obvious kind of bias that you are picking up large numbers of the people involved in the study are not being accounted for so there's a lot of missing bits of information and your colleagues who are reading and reading this data are not exercising critical thinking faculties they're not looking at the stats themselves and they're not looking they're not looking for the raw data or asking the right questions not at all because people depend on their doctors to advise them and if the doctors are ill-informed and uneducated they're not able to give you a proper assessment uh proper recommendation i just am so just our profession is so important right now and i am so disappointed and i'm calling my colleagues out because we took oaths as physicians to first do no harm and to always look at the risks versus the benefits of any treatment we do the benefits must outweigh the risks and right now i am not seeing that and also it is our duty to tell the patient they are they are entering into an experiment and give informed consent and let them know of all these things and the potential risks as well and i see none of that going on i see them advising them to get it it's a good idea don't worry it's it's going you're going to be better and they don't tell them that they're in the middle of an experiment that's really very scary and you know i along those lines i recall just yesterday i think it was the surgeon general was on twitter asking doing a q a and encouraging people to ask him questions but you know he gave a little spiel before he started and i heard that bit and he was basically saying the vaccine is safe and effective and he was encouraging people to get it is that not disgusting that on the highest level that they're using such poor science and professionalism i'm just i'm disgusted and horrified really ramola um yeah do you also see the media reporting along those lines i mean because they pick up what fauci says they pick up what the surgeon general says they pick up what pfizer says yeah and they're presenting a little narrative here that the vaccine is safe and effective and we shouldn't discourage people from getting the vaccine because that's called vaccine hesitancy yes well and then first of all it's good to go back to the media yes they are spinning that story but we shouldn't even be calling it a vaccine i think you've heard that before this is not a vaccine by all definition um you know vaccines are very different you actually give the person the organism it's not really homeopathy but i tell people it's kind of like getting a little bit of what makes you sick so that your body knows how to protect itself that's a very simplified version but people understand that in this instance no we're not doing that we're putting a code into you to reprogram your cell to then force it to make a protein or another genetic code that is not from nature that is completely synthetic uh you're reprogramming a cell this is nothing to do with a vaccine nothing to do with what we've done before um and a lot of things can go wrong because if we put a program of code into anything and everybody has smart devices they know that they don't always work and this is a this is the first time they're going to roll this out look at microsoft they've been around forever they still have so many problems and they're actually the number one programmer behind this they've been doing this for years and they still have tons of problems now they're doing it to a human body and of course they're going to have lots of no idea that we're using brand new technology talking about microsoft i think people you know it could be argued that microsoft sort of created a system that was rife with bugs viruses to put it mildly the very same term and uh you know that's how it was introduced on the market in the first place so then they could produce all sorts of fixes for their bugs their bug fixes as well well i think they just repeat history right i believe that that's the intention with this one as well um you know it's programming you so that you keep needing another vaccine and going back to the meetings i've been to that was told to us that that was the intent that we would just be downloading our own vaccines as medications many times a year from our smart devices indefinitely and that my job as a physician in my lifetime would be obsolete because all we would need are downloads and people should really think about what that means because a human body organic human body uh that's we don't need downloads right absolutely and you know i think this is where people sort of start going fuzzy and going well how can your phone actually affect your body but that's because of what's in this vaccine that begins to change the human body right that's that's the key to all of this um you know it's not just introducing a genetic synthetic code into the body it's that they're introducing nanotechnology or the nanolipid particles are all under a term called nanotechnology which is under a term called hydrogel okay they're right they're using different terms for the same substance and so they have many different functions one of them is to be a drug delivery system on demand drug delivery system and that's what they're saying this is the intent of this but if you look at all the research and the literature and the meetings i went to it's very clear that they intend to use this nanotechnology for other purposes and the other main purpose would be for a biosensor meaning your body would have sensors in it that are really like little nanobots it's an artificial interface hookup it's an if you get enough of this substance inside your body it would make you be it would make it feel like having a smartphone inside your body so that remotely for via wi-fi you could control things but also things can control you or your your body could put out information and your body could receive information so messages going back and forth without the need of this intermediate device here okay so the idea is to accumulate data from your body all your physical characteristics which might sound great your blood sugar your blood pressure medications in your body very intimate details like sexual function um you know how much sun you're getting your thoughts and your emotions the software is already built into the phones to gather that they just need the hardware inside of us to do the ultimate hookup and so the vaccines are a method and an excuse to get this kind of technology into the human body and why would they want to do that uh well they're going to tell us and they already have well this is great you know we'll be able to give you instant feedback you'll know when you need insulin and we'll have devices and you can make your own insulin if you're a diabetic what if you tore your tendon great these little nanobots could go there and heal that oh you can have better eyesight better memory you could be a superhuman that way that's what they're going to tell you but if you look at what they discuss in meetings and the patents that are out there there's nothing to do with it these biosensors will be gathering the information but it's going to be used for other purposes it's going to be used to know everything about you to do surveillance and there'll no be there won't be any more privacy they'll know what you're thinking before maybe you think it right um so it's really for surveillance and control and then if you look at good old microsoft they put the patent out this year or last year of the zero six zero six zero six we're using this biosensor data and they would calculate that and give you your cryptocurrency based on whether or not you are a good human or bad human based on all the data that they're getting so they already have in their mind what a good human is and what a bad human is and they're basing that off the social credit system from china so those things i know not just from that patent but the business meeting that i attended where they discussed this was the intent for populations of people that they had the power and the autonomy and the right to control and modify behavior of a group of people to do it and so again the only thing holding them back is again getting that substance inside of us it's called a payload and how much do they need i'm not sure and i don't think they know yet either that's why they said be ready to get multiple vaccines and so this vaccine already looks like a failure so far with as far as kobe 19 but i don't think they care about that that's not the point of it the point of it is something else the point of it is to introduce other technology and to us it's really for surveillance and control so that is why we're warning people yeah and they haven't given full disclosure have they i mean informed consent would mean that everybody knows all of this that this is in the newspapers this is in on television this is what the report is and npr and pbs and everybody should be talking about right but we don't that is correct well you know moderna has finally put out a statement being somewhat honest about their drug and they said our vaccines drugs are operating systems and that we use each um rna that goes into the vaccine to act like a the the download of an application on your phone they use that analogy so now they've actually published a statement saying this is what it does okay so they're becoming more a little bit as time goes on they're telling you more and more about the truth of the vaccines um and it's crazy because yes you present this data to people but i guess it's too much for them to believe they can't comprehend it um and i i don't know how much difference to explain if we had it on the major media that's right it would be a huge difference because it absolutely does need interpreters and you know people to comment and explain and talk about it there has to be a public debate and that's being denied the populace by the media cover-up and the media silence about this because as we as we noted i mean the surgeon general is pushing it fire she's pushing the cdc is pushing it they're pushing the vaccine in other words they don't want people to know too much about it they just want you to take it that is correct um and you know by all science they should have rejected this vaccine based on the study data they have so far any other medicine would have been thrown away they would have stopped the study this time they're they're allowing this to go through you we all know it has to be for another motive another agenda and that's when you look at what is actually in it and you'll see that this is for another purpose completely is nothing to do about the virus itself there's nothing to do about that that is just an excuse to give out these injections and they won't be satisfied until they get a certain amount in each person and they don't know so again everybody's a guinea pig everybody's a lab rat and that's why we're seeing these horrific um adverse events or effects happening in some people they're getting these neurologic issues where they're having seizures and convulsions that go on for days the convulsions are terrible and the people are having uh just convulsions where they can't even walk and they can't talk um and then we don't even have a diagnosis for that ramola we don't really know what that is that's how scary it is it's brand new kind of a side effect we have never seen it before i actually predicted that would happen because um of the the nanolipid particle hydrogel has an affinity for the nervous system and i predicted that people would have those kind of neurologic reactions we don't even know long-term effects yet these are just short-term effects these are just short-term effects wow that's really scary to contemplate paralysis is another one we're seeing a lot again neurologic effects we're seeing a lot of those um you know then there's the intermediate effects that we know from the previous animal studies that show that the animals who got the same kind of vaccine in the past with the same kind of virus when they were introduced to the virus in the future instead of doing better they did worse they had cytokine storms the body attacked itself more like the autoimmune disorder on steroids and they had more lung inflammation liver failure and with these kinds of vaccines we can affect that we can expect that effect in us as well meaning the next covert 21 that occurs or the next flu season people could have much more adverse events be much sicker be in the hospital more so that's the intermediate and in the long term we know with these kinds of vaccines to expect more cancers more autoimmune disorders um more mutant genes and we definitely know there'll be infertility with this with this vaccine for sure that's a definite wow that's a lot i don't know anybody listening to this you know who would want to go out and take the vaccine the gosh i don't even know where to start but this notion there are two or three things that you talked about one of those was you talked about paralysis which is such an important thing for people to take on board to understand that this that this vaccine could indeed create paralysis um also the bell's palsy right the face have to face being frozen yes we're seeing quite a few reports of that and again what do what do we not know because we do know that they're omitting a lot of side effects purposely because they won't say let's say somebody does have a bell's palsy if the researcher or the physician could say that well they had a predispos predisposition to something in the past maybe they had lupus or something like that well that's because of that and then they won't market as an adverse event so we already know many reports are coming back where they refuse to market as an adverse event when we know it is i can tell you we know for a fact many many many people in the nursing home are dying within a day or two of getting the um vaccine and none of them are being reported because they said they would have died anyway where is this information coming from this is major everything there's some there's some uk reports i can i can get that for you please do yeah this is amazing i'll definitely sort of publicize it a little bit more um because people need to know you know because this is what people are worried about and when they look at some of the occasional um reports of death you know for instance that doctor in florida they said oh no he had a pre-existing condition and then of course there's the whole scandal about tiffany dover nobody knows what happened to her yeah you know nobody knows because there's sort of conflicting information coming through um so and my suspicion just so you know i think a lot of colleagues do think this just we are in the middle of an experiment and a good experiment always has the real drug and a placebo or um you know uh something that's the control meaning usually 50 of the time you get the real drug 50 of the time the placebo since we are still in the middle of an experiment i would expect that to happen in the general populace right now i don't know this for sure but my suspicion is there's they're only going to give the real vaccine 50 of the time and um some inert substance another 50 of the time because that would be a part of a true study they would have to see what was happening have a control now that would be double blinded too meaning the researcher or the doctor would not know who's getting the drug and who's not and also the patient or subject would not know either which if if we were able to analyze these vaccines i guarantee you would find that out are you still there yeah okay you just come back yeah something happened blanked out for a second so um that is something that i wish we could get an answer on but again with the emergency preparedness act we're we're blinded and um we don't know what's going on really but that would be part of a normal protocol that is um they're doing research on but we won't know that i don't know if we can ever know that get that information we would have to analyze these vaccines or get someone to be honest with us right yeah because it seems like somebody should have have that information right so that well if you could analyze them the initial data from moderna said we can expect in low-dose vaccine group 80 would get systemic side effects right away the high dose 100 percent well that the moderna is being rolled out nobody's getting side effect or not that many people are getting the side effects it doesn't match the previous study so it had me very suspicious are we really giving out the vaccine to every single person are we still in the study are we still in the experiment and if we're still an experiment i would expect only 50 of the people to get the vaccine and 50 to get a placebo it's it's crazy because we are i'm bringing these things out because there are questions that should be answered but we're not getting the answers to them because we're talking about our lives you know it's not just a product that we're producing we're talking about our human lives the future of us absolutely i'm so glad you're bringing up these questions because they're very important for everybody to hear and everybody to know the true nature of the situation which is even more dicey than i thought it seems like it's an open experiment there's no data about the experiment there's no information even into doctors there's no public information no public discussion no information on safety and now we're seeing all of these horrific side effects and you're suggesting also that these side effects are occurring for a couple of different reasons right you've got the um allergic reactions you've got sudden paralysis and policy being attributed to pre-existing conditions but could possibly be a neurological in the vaccine is affecting the neurological system the nervous system the the nanolipid particles they have an affinity for the nervous tissue so the nerves um and you know we're all different we can't expect the same thing to happen and this is brand new technology and our bodies are very smart you know our bodies know when something synthetic is being entered into it um you know and we have to understand that that code is synthetic as well as the nanotechnology two synthetic things are going in not organic again people have to understand not from nature not from the body this is unbelievable um so of course the body's going to have reactions to that of course we're going to see problems and that's this is only the beginning this is and like i said their plan is to give us many of these vaccines if this only lasts for two months are they going to really tell us every two months we must take something what is their end game here what is the end result when when will it stop and because it does not prevent transmission or to be contagious we are still told to wear a mask to stay social distance to be in quarantine we're told to do all the same things and when does it end it doesn't end and it sounds like they're trying to make you sicker so that you know these idiotic measures that they are suggesting that we all um participate in with the mask and social distancing will have some validity or meaning or legitimacy as time proceeds because it appears that they want to create disease they want to create chronic disease they want to create neurological side effects i mean it's it's completely shocking what is going on um this the the thing that you mentioned the synthetic stuff that's going into the body does this have to do with the with the fact that this particular virus has not really been isolated and how it's been put together is just through codes on the computer that resembles the virus it's not really the virus because it hasn't been isolated it's just a bunch of codes that in some way uh imitates or comes close simulates the virus that is very correct we've never isolated the virus yet nobody has so it's recombinant it is um made from different sources and in computer program ultimately made the code a computer program that's mind-boggling i mean i think that's something to stop at right there and just marvel at how can we computer program actually yeah yeah how can a computer program make this i i don't have an answer for that because we've never done this before um i i just don't see that as a good thing to do and just to remind everybody i say this all the time that if this synthetic code becomes permanent in our bodies then by law by the supreme court justice ruling anybody that has a patent on that synthetic gene which they all have patents the owners of that patent will then own you own part are all of you that is the ruling as it stands now that some entity microsoft department of defense bill gates whoever else is involved on the patent of that synthetic gene can then take ownership of all or part of you on a human being that is that is the truth this is the scariest thing to me and it's very upsetting to me and they're not even wanting to talk about it in the major media because they said don't worry about it it won't be permanent wait we don't have the full study yet we don't know that don't say that they don't know that and there's there's many ways it can become permanent in our body what they're saying is it's it's temporary because they're looking at how the function is in a petri dish we are not petri dishes our bodies are very complex very intricate and we have many other different enzymes and methods where we our bodies are smart where they can take that code and then go in a reverse transcriptase enzyme go back words up into the nucleus and put it back into the main genome yes we can do that our bodies can do it so if it's permanent like i suspect it can be look at that we have to face now of people literally being owned you think microsoft doesn't know this i think they know this very well oh deliberate lecturers know that not only do they know this it appears that if they're rolling it down they have to be very aware they know these things yeah it's absolutely shocking because uh if you did have children oh my gosh the royalties you would owe on that right my god your children would belong to somebody else in a sort of digital enslavement scenario and you might owe them money because you made a copy they think about it i mean it's it's people think it's far-fetched but you know these guys are dirty you think they really care it's on the law it's it's legal and who knows i've never seen i'm not i'm not getting the vaccine but what are people signing when they get the vaccine i i imagine there has to be some sheep they're signing i have no idea yeah some kind of disclaimer right yeah you can't who knows what it is yeah there's there's so many twists and turns and dirty little things that are going on it's it's it's not being obviously not transparent and we need to put a moratorium immediately on this and investigate it and see what's going on in so many different levels and you know the the genetic manipulation um the code happens to code for the same things as something some of the things in our body so by chance in the code that they're putting in us part of that is coding for synsitin a protein that's on the woman's placenta that means anything inside the code your body will learn to attack that means your body will learn to attack the placenta if a woman gets pregnant we know that why aren't we talking about it also chromosome 8 the same sequence of chromosome 8 happens to be in the spike protein again anything in that spike protein that the body will attack that means the body will attack chromosome 8 it will damage it that means that's your intelligence again your fertility i cannot believe we aren't talking about this i can't believe we're going forward with this we know everybody knows anything in that vaccine the body will learn to attack why are we going forward with this and one more thing to bring up is in australia with one of the similar vaccines their batches that they gave out they happened to test the people for hiv after they gave the vaccine when they did the people were testing positive now the manufacturer and the government of australia they said uh don't worry it's only they're only false positives but we know that there's no way that any of us could know that for sure until time goes on give it some years three years five years maybe it's a true positive those poor people won't know until years later so they were so concerned that they did ditch about one billion dollars of those vaccines they were going to administer to the rest of the population we expected that to happen because they also analyzed that code and found there were at least 18 subunits of hiv one in the code of this fight protein by chance so your body will be making bits of hiv one how much will that affect your immune system only time will tell when this experiment ends people need to know what is in the code yes there there's so much in here how i just am just clueless and shocked at how my colleagues aren't speaking up more okay i i don't understand it i've never seen anything like this in science ramola it's really shocking are you in touch at all with any doctors who share your concerns on this really intense level and perhaps would like to represent your group to people like fauci and you know the guys at the top who are happily pushing this vaccine uh you know sometimes you feel like you're in a bad movie you've had that feeling this is a definitely because um i just i'm in a metro atlanta and the word is that a lot of the doctors are getting it and they're saying it's fantastic and they're recommending everybody else get it and they're not seeing anything else than that that it's safe that there's no way that it can hurt you they're actually saying those statements um i just like i said i'm speechless yeah i'm seeing don't just take take the vaccine themselves anybody taking it i've heard that yes they are taking the vaccine or they're telling the people that they're taking the vaccine um at least they're telling people they are yeah people are taking the vaccine so that we have no way of knowing if they've actually you know as time goes on we're seeing that divide happen in people um more you see one group of people learning more and understanding the agenda more and then the other group seems to be purposely not wanting to learn um and just accepting the dogma accepting whatever has been told to them by the talking heads i am at least i'm seeing that divide definitely i can see how that can happen if you are actually seeing it um is there a monetary incentive for doctors to give this vaccine to their patients do you know um i'm not in the insurance business i don't take insurance anymore so i don't know directly but i can tell you in the past yes i was and with the vaccines i was penalized heavily financially because i did not give the vaccines out to my patients so much though that couldn't run the private business anymore it was a hundred and seventy five thousand dollars five years ago it was taken away from me um just for the vaccines alone what they'll do is you you see a patient for only 50 to 75 of what you normally would see them for so a lower amount and then the end of the year they give you the rest of your money back it's not a they call it a bonus it's not a bonus they're just giving you the rest of your money back but the new law was when they did the central payer system even the private pay goes through the central payer system so technically it's a socialized medicine marin so when they look at that they said we'll give you the rest of your money but you have to fulfill the criteria did you give the vaccines to so many percentage of your patients yes or no and if it's no you don't get the money are your patients take so many taking the cholesterol medicines most of mine didn't i got docked on that but they didn't need it so you're seeing that it's just do as i say or you don't get paid and so anyone in the system has been indoctrinated for a while and has been brainwashed or that's the that's the path they have to go or they don't work in that system anymore so you have to leave the system they've adapted to the system yeah they've been successful in changing the mindset of my um colleagues i'm sorry i guess we had another one of those moments where you froze out for a second but it sounds like this is being run by the insurance companies and the pharma companies behind them right yeah in our insurance companies they're really there aren't any true private insurance companies anymore years ago they all had to go through something called the central payer system in our in our medicare which means and then medicare determined who got paid out and what happened in essence it means our government controls all the private pay it's the most expensive socialized medicine system i've ever seen we really are in a socialized medicine already the way that it's formulated it's a very yeah it's just very expensive one yeah wow so they have to abide by all the rules of the government and if they don't there's no there's no negotiating with another doctor trying to go back and forth prevent present research is yes or no there's algorithms and protocols now period so this changed a lot and it goes for i guess it goes for all of your um disease diagnosis it goes for all your tests it goes for all the drugs you give out and now it also goes for the vaccines it accounts for the vaccines as well so if it does it's i mean it's possible that the covered vaccine is rolled into that right i mean i would imagine what about the flu vaccine that's probably part of that scenario as well oh definitely the flu vaccine is a part of it all the vaccines are i'm sure this one is i i would i don't know this for a fact but they've already been giving bonuses on diagnosis for coven 19. they could be doing a bonus for this vaccine as well i don't i'll have to see if i can find that information out though thank you yeah if you could look into that and you know i'll try to look into that as well because i think that would be very interesting information for all of us to know are doctors getting a payout yeah i'll i'll do something around and see what i'm i can find out um on that one brilliant yeah that would be interesting to know i also wanted to ask you um carrie because you have studied vaccines for a long time perhaps you can sort of indicate to viewers a little bit of why vaccines in themselves are problematic or what your views are as a consequence of your research what is some of the conclusions you came to regarding vaccines and you know because you chose not to encourage your patients to get vaccinated so how did you come to that yeah well um early on i questioned the tetanus vaccine a long time ago and even when i was a teenager because the reason they give out the tetanus vaccine it's not because it can give you cellulitis the reason is that if you got the bacteria in your body within minutes to hours not days minutes to hours all the muscles in your body would spasm so terribly you would die in a little curled up ball on the floor suffocating to death which is a horrendous way to die you would think you would hear about somebody dying like that in the news somewhere around the world never so this got me questioning all the way through my residency nobody could give me a bona fide case of any human dying in that manner that was proven to be from tetanus even my very good infectious disease attendings looked into it they admitted there was no case no case they could prove by science that someone died this way so all of us the residents said well then tetanus doesn't exist why are we giving the vaccine or deatness in that manner doesn't exist and we were told to be quiet or we would be black bald from the industry we would never work again and to continue to give the vaccine you're always told that in medicine when you question quiet or you'll be black bald you'll never work again i've just told that many times so i knew there was a reason it was given because it wasn't for that very uh for for that manner of people dying so i noticed in one of my hospitals i trained at that people with private pay got the tetanus vaccine but people on social or the welfare did not get it in this particular hospital they got all the other vaccines i asked why they told me be quiet this is the protocol don't question it just go with it again no reason i did notice that because i learned by patterns there was a pattern and of course the pattern was with the welfare they were extremely fertile with people with private pay having trouble with fertility so i thought maybe that was the link i researched it and sure enough you can find lots of data about um the catholics and the vatican being the ones to find this out that it was used as a sterilization or an abortion vaccine that it has purposely been researched and developed since 1972 they started using it 1976 in this manner it's been identified through independent labs that the pregnancy hormone has been in the tetanus vaccines um in nicaragua mexico india kenya many other countries and they noticed that it was like a 50 50 50 had it 50 didn't but it has been purposely researched and developed to be a sterilization vaccine now who and how many people are getting around the world will never know that the world health organization and the nih won't admit it but when i found that out i was horrified because that means everybody in the world has been lied to about the intent of tetanus vaccine all the doctors our medical institutions our training institutions our hospitals we've been lied to about why we're giving that out what other drug what other vaccine has the same intent how can we trust anything now because we're all being lied to so if that was the case then i looked into the other vaccines you know and finding out that a lot of them didn't have studies to prove they were efficacious that they even worked finding out that there was actually studies done to show that they were hurting us that they're causing autism and cancers and that nobody did anything they continued on giving the vaccines we know even recently that the flu vaccine has many viruses inside of that that they can stay dormant and human and become activated later and cause you to have cancer but we still give out the very same vaccines we've never changed them we know that african american boys with the mmr vaccine have a very high propensity for getting autism because the vaccine itself is linked directly with their autism there's an enzyme involved did anyone change that protocol no those boys still get the mmr vaccine we could go on and on there's many instances of adenovirus being in the vaccine like this one of the um the new uh copin 19 vaccines has that virus in it that one's been linked to hiv and cancer we know why are we using the same one again uh there's so many different things knowing that they're using the aborted fetal cell lines um the animal cell lines lots of different things like that you know medicine we only get four hours of training and vaccines a doctor gets only four hours of training that's it so unless you look in fast again your own you'll never know this wow this is absolutely incredible information because it sounds like the average pediatrician or the average physician has no idea and it's only people like you dedicated researchers who go in and look at the actual studies or lack thereof that begin to find out yeah also the poisons are have never been analyzed so the poisons when they're cumulative and synergistic they work together and when they accumulate in the body we do know they cause more and more problems we've never had a full study to see exactly what happens but we do know with the more vaccines and more autism and the cdc has admitted that by the year 2030 to 2035 that 50 percent of the children born will be on the autistic spectrum 50 percent of our population we cannot survive humanity cannot survive that way you know that no it's no absolutely no and you know we need to put a stop to the way they're manufacturing these vaccines ramola you probably know that i didn't know till recently with the fetal the fetal cell lines they have to get the the fetal cells from a living fetus that's some really more mature in age so the baby has to be born with a beating heart a beating it's really a it's a blood sacrifice i i can tell you testimonies on this i read the actual doctors the researchers diaries and i broke out crying you know they purposely will deliver the baby in the sack bring it to the laboratory it's still got a beating heart and they either people have to know this they either take scissors and cut through the face while it's alive or cut to the chest while it's still alive or take a needle and puncture it in the heart while it's still alive they say they do that because they need the cells to be that fresh but i'm i cannot see by science the justification of that i don't believe that at all um how many babies has this happened to it's uh it's disgusting uh people need to know that we are doing that to our own babies and i doubt the mothers know that they are doing that i believe that they're just telling them that the baby's dead already and you know they called you know 20 week old or 14 week old or 16 week old uh babies they call them embryos sometimes the researchers will call them that to justify what they're doing that is not an embryo that it's a fetus not an embryo right exactly exactly so that's so you know i believe there's energies too you're getting the energy of that of that murder that happened uh and that cell line is being cloned and when it's cloned they actually purposely make the cell line immortal when it's immortal it means it's cancer they purposely make now that murdered baby cell line they turn it into a cancer cell line and that is part of the vaccine almost every normal vaccine that we have regular mmr flu whatever they have those cell lines in there the cancerous fetal cell lines and many of them come from really bad genetic lines and we have we can transpose or accumulate or assimilate some of those genes into our genome so we're not only that we're using very unhealthy cell lines from unhealthy um they might have autoimmune cancers in their lineage etc right i was going to say it's going to probably induce cancer and also open the door for all sorts of autoimmune diseases as well and all sorts of other hereditary genetic diseases as you mentioned and the animal cells that we're using also again we're using all kinds of animals even army worms and all kinds of creative things um but we do know particularly from like a cow when they're doing getting the cell line from them they have many viruses in them already just like we all have viruses in us we know for a fact these viruses that are injected into us through the vaccines can lie dormant and those can cause other kinds of cancers and problems too there's been about 400 different viruses from these animal cell lines that are potentials for being inside of the vaccine when you're injected with it this incredible amount if you look at this hodgepodge of things put together inside of us and then we get more and more and more and we're not getting the proper research on it it's quite amazing imagine uh the damage that can be done from that this is absolutely major major information i mean it's absolutely horrifying to even imagine that all of this is going into the body and remember we're giving it to our children at such a young age right between two you know earlier than two i think they're doing it and the the first day or two of birth first one to two days old and they don't have you know babies don't have their own immune system they use their mothers up until two months of age so i always question why are we giving them vaccines when they don't have their own immunity it doesn't make sense it could only harm them it cannot help them they have to form their own immunity first before you give them a vaccine but we don't do that it's uh we're not going by science or rational behavior anymore so we need to stand back and ask why are we doing it if we're not going by signs and rational thought there's another motive there's another agenda you know it's okay yeah that's all right i could tell i was being frozen so i stopped uh the the one thing that was that struck me as you were speaking Carrie is that perhaps there's a need for real public education of people you know from people like you and doctors like you to tell us the great dangers of giving these um sort of poison laden laden and other virus and other problematic cell-laden vaccines to infants who haven't developed their own immune system and what the importance of that development is and how the immune system actually should naturally develop and you know how it can develop and be very strong in an infant through breastfeeding through all sorts of other means you know better than me um you know as the infant progresses and what exactly the infant needs minus vaccines because you know what's happening now and this is one of my real strong concerns is that the there's been such a paradigm shift such an ideological shift thanks to what mainstream media has done that people imagine we need vaccines in order to be healthy right and in order to to support our immune systems we that's the sort of the storyline the narrative that's been pushed on us immune system so perhaps we need people like you to you know inform us a little bit more so that on a regular basis so that we understand that hello you know the human body is much stronger than that yes you're right about all of that um what we're fighting against right now as you know is the censorship you know we have that uh to really overcome and the one of the hot words is vaccines right you start talking about that you're already at censorship on the grandest level and people are afraid to talk about it because of that especially medical professionals you're definitely targeted for that um that's why people are afraid however i i look at it this way again we are the most pivotal point of human history right at this moment and we need these voices more now than ever before and we're talking about the future of us of humanity and we have to speak up so people say i'm brave i'm not brave i'm just doing what we all should do i think i can't even think of another way to be there's nothing more important at this time right now than to warn people of what is about to hap what is happening right now um i love human 1.0 i love us i believe we're made in the likeness of god we're beautiful beings we forgot who we are we're turning ourselves over to this this um automated this artificial intelligence and genetic modification and dumbing ourselves down and lowering our frequency and lowering who we are i'm saddened by that because if only people remembered who we are remembered that light inside of us our genetic code from god god is within us the light is within us that they remembered that and turned it back on we are powerful beings much more powerful than that ai could ever make us and if we can ever get that message out and share it with our brothers and sisters around the world and spread that love that high frequency energy you know that's what makes this this world a paradise that's what will make us whole that's what gives us that paradise on earth right and that absolutely that's the message that we need to be sharing and get people out of the fear that fear is driving them them to that low frequency and they can only see the answer in the low frequency the answer there is the nanotechnology artificial intelligence the high frequency you can see the light you can see what the real answer is and it's not that absolutely absolutely powerful words and that may be a really powerful note to close this interview on um dr gary thank you so much for actually going in depth into this and you know the the distinction you're making here between [Music] versus humans you know going in the direction of artificial intelligence i think that is a primary and a huge distinction and what people are being deprived from choosing for themselves by the lack of information the lack of public debate and the huge cover-up by mainstream media so you know it's voices like yours that are so important and so needed um is there anything else that you would like to touch on today something to encourage people to do perhaps before they i know well i tell people it's overwhelming so we need to start the baby steps um and start to remember who we are so every week i encourage you to go to each other's homes and you don't have your cell phone on no zoo meetings you're with each other there's no masks you hug each other kiss each other you cook together real food you know if you're i do bible studies or you put on music and sing and dance all the things they tell us not to do they're telling us not to do that because it breaks us down breaks the family unit breaks your community breaks you down makes you think that you're not human and if you ignore that and you know that that's your superpower your superpower is remembering to be human remembering who you are so start doing everything they tell you not to do and you start doing it in your homes and that will light that fire that's in your heart and light that spark and i i'm telling you the veil starts to come off your eyes and you will find that light and that courage and you will know what to do when the time comes that's absolutely powerful you know that reminds me so much of what dr christian northrup she says the same thing and i guess pamela popper is saying the same thing with her groups she says make little groups meet in people's homes in other words you know do not sit around listening to mainstream media and listening to these government eatings which are coming from this whole field of lack of knowledge lack of safety lack of truth lack of science really when it comes down to it you know because it's really it sounds like this is a pseudoscience politicized science setup it's not true signs and you know gravitating over to trying to find out more to learn more might start right here by just making a few decisions to start getting back your freedom and getting back your sense of self and meeting with other people and so on and so forth so wonderful wonderful advice gary thank you so much for being here thank you for going in depth again into all of these issues the dangers of these vaccines and boy the dangers of vaccines in themselves you know the fact that they have poisons sort of by nature that's that's what vaccines are they carry poison in them yeah they're not what you think they are they're not what you were told they're not what you think they are they're not what you're told and this is why it's important for everybody to look into the real signs of vaccines instead of falling into this provax anti-vax kind of weird debate and you know dismissing the concerns of people calling them anti-vaxxers and anti-vaccine it's not an issue of anti-vaccine or pro-vaccine it's an issue of what are they do what else need them and when it comes to this vaccine do any of us need it you know i don't see the benefits in this vaccine at all and i'm just looking at it purely from a scientific view i i can't understand how this is going forward yeah i'm so glad that you spoke out in just those terms and perhaps you'll inspire a lot of other doctors listening to you to sort of wake up and start speaking in the same terms and asking the same questions reap about and um make decisions whether we want to do it or not obviously right who wants to become property of bill gates so never doing it there's no way not taking it no way nobody's taking it nobody in my family nobody i know that's good as long as i live and can speak right yeah it's been a pleasure talking with you ramola and um uh yeah we'll have to talk again soon and where we stand and what's going on huh wonderful absolutely i'd love to have you but let's stay in touch by emailing you and let me know what your schedule's like sounds great okay have a beautiful evening thanks everyone for watching have a wonderful evening talk to you later
Dr. Cowan breaks down the mechanisms of mRNA viruses, giving context to the ongoing COVID conundrum regarding the "vaccines." NOTE: He uses the word, "vacation" in place of "vaccine" because this video was initially uploaded to YouTube.
A study published in the journal Cancer Discovery finds that lung cancer progresses when the lungs are forced to regurgitate microbes. Prolonged mask use creates a moist environment that cultivates microbes. This toxic environment not only forces the person to regurgitate their own wastes, but also inundates the lungs with microbes that cause a toxic environment that feeds lung cancer.
As many countries begin to lift some of the restrictions to contain COVID-19 spread, lack of evidence of transmission in the school setting remains. We examined Irish notifications of SARS-CoV2 in the school setting before school closures on 12 March 2020 and identified no paediatric transmission. This adds to current evidence that children do not appear to be drivers of transmission, and we argue that reopening schools should be considered safe accompanied by certain measures.
The Florida Health Department and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are investigating the death of a Florida doctor who died Jan. 3 from a rare autoimmune disorder he developed on Dec. 21, three days after receiving Pfizer's COVID vaccine.
As The Defender reported last week, Heidi Neckelmann, the wife of Dr. Gregory Michael, said that in her mind, her 56-year-old husband's death was "100% linked" to the vaccine.
Now, at least one doctor has come forward publicly to say he also believes the vaccine caused Michael to develop acute idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), the disorder that killed him.
Things seem to be working backwards at The Commons on St. Anthony nursing home in Auburn, New York. Vaccinating people is supposed to reduce or end coronavirus deaths. Right? But, at The Commons, such deaths are reported to have occurred only after residents began receiving coronavirus vaccinations.
James T. Mulder wrote Saturday at syracuse.com that until December 29 there had been no coronavirus deaths at The Commons. December 29, when deaths of residents with coronavirus began occurring at The Commons, is also, Mulder's article discloses, seven days days after the nursing home began giving coronavirus vaccinations to residents, with 80 percent of residents so far having been vaccinated.
Over a period of less than two weeks since December 29, Mulder relates that 24 coronavirus-infected residents at the 300-bed nursing home have died.
A letter to the editor published in the New England Journal of Medicine titled "Open Schools, Covid-19, and Child and Teacher Morbidity in Sweden" has found that "Despite Sweden's having kept schools and preschools open, we found a low incidence of severe Covid-19 among schoolchildren and children of preschool age during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic…No child with Covid-19 died…Among the 1,951,905 million children who were 1 to 16 years of age, 15 children had Covid-19, MIS-C, or both conditions and were admitted to an ICU, which is equal to 1 child in 130,000."
New research released Wednesday should provide comfort to covid-19 survivors worried about losing their natural immunity to the coronavirus anytime soon. The findings suggest that in most people, a robust immune response to the virus lasts for at least eight months—and there are good signs that it could even last years.
12bytes says: And the alleged immunity offered by the vaccine is somewhere around 2 months, assuming it works at all, and then there's all the potential side-effects of a brand new type of fast-tracked vaccine for which long term trials and animal testing were completely skipped.
Dr. Karla Cecilia Pérez Osorio reportedly was working as an internist at the General Hospital of Zone No. 7, in the municipality of Monclova. She was subsequently transferred to the High Specialty Medical Unit No. 25 of the IMSS, in Monterrey, Nuevo León.
She was reportedly evaluated by a neurologist and diagnosed with transverse myelitis, a known side effect of vaccines, and specifically of the COVID experimental mRNA vaccines as this injury was observed in some of the vaccine trials of the various COVID19 experimental trials being conducted around the world.
Three people who have been vaccinated against the crown virus in this country have now died. This is confirmed by Rúna Hauksdóttir Hvannberg, director of the Icelandic Medicines Agency, in a conversation with mbl.is. She emphasizes that there is no evidence that there is a causal link between deaths and vaccinations.
Rúna also says that although there is no prospect of the aforementioned causal relationship, the cases will nevertheless be investigated as possible side effects of the vaccine.
What do the authors write about the safety of the vaccine? They say there's a 83% probability of discovering a relevant side effect if the side effect in question occurs more often than in 1 in 10,000 vaccinees (0.01%). This also automatically means that there is a 17% probability that such an adverse side effect will not be detected at this frequency of occurrence. Rarer side effects, or side effects that only occur at a later stage, cannot of course be found with this research.
What I find particularly disturbing, and I don't understand why the editors of the NEJM approved this, is that the authors of the article argue that it would be (ethically) unjustified to assess the safety and efficacy of the vaccine in the context of continuing the double blind study. This implies that they intended to also vaccinate the placebo group. Doing this will definitely eradicate the possibility to attribute any serious side effects to the vaccine with certainty. This directly serves the interest of the vaccine producer in the context of any liability, even if this liability has been deposited with the national authorities.
Background and Aims The most restrictive non‐pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) for controlling the spread of COVID‐19 are mandatory stay‐at‐home and business closures. Given the consequences of these policies, it is important to assess their effects. We evaluate the effects on epidemic case growth of more restrictive NPIs (mrNPIs), above and beyond those of less restrictive NPIs (lrNPIs).
Methods We first estimate COVID‐19 case growth in relation to any NPI implementation in subnational regions of 10 countries: England, France, Germany, Iran, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, and the US. Using first‐difference models with fixed effects, we isolate the effects of mrNPIs by subtracting the combined effects of lrNPIs and epidemic dynamics from all NPIs. We use case growth in Sweden and South Korea, two countries that did not implement mandatory stay‐at‐home and business closures, as comparison countries for the other 8 countries (16 total comparisons).
Results Implementing any NPIs was associated with significant reductions in case growth in 9 out of 10 study countries, including South Korea and Sweden that implemented only lrNPIs (Spain had a non‐significant effect). After subtracting the epidemic and lrNPI effects, we find no clear, significant beneficial effect of mrNPIs on case growth in any country. In France, e.g., the effect of mrNPIs was +7% (95CI ‐5%‐19%) when compared with Sweden, and +13% (‐12%‐38%) when compared with South Korea (positive means pro‐contagion). The 95% confidence intervals excluded 30% declines in all 16 comparisons and 15% declines in 11/16 comparisons.
Conclusions While small benefits cannot be excluded, we do not find significant benefits on case growth of more restrictive NPIs. Similar reductions in case growth may be achievable with less restrictive interventions.
Background: Narratives about complaints in children and adolescents caused by wearing a mask are accumulating. There is, to date, no registry for side effects of masks.
Methods: At the University of Witten/Herdecke an online registry has been set up where parents, doctors, pedagogues and others can enter their observations. On 20.10.2020, 363 doctors were asked to make entries and to make parents and teachers aware of the registry.
Results: By 26.10.2020 the registry had been used by 20,353 people. In this publication we report the results from the parents, who entered data on a total of 25,930 children. The average wearing time of the mask was 270 minutes per day. Impairments caused by wearing the mask were reported by 68% of the parents. These included irritability (60%), headache (53%), difficulty concentrating (50%), less happiness (49%), reluctance to go to school/kindergarten (44%), malaise (42%) impaired learning (38%) and drowsiness or fatigue (37%).
This 2021 bill in New York State has just been filed and has not yet passed but it appears to have support. If legislated, it will be the first instance of state-authorized detention centers for anyone who is deemed to be "potentially dangerous to the public health."
This means that the state can forcibly remove you from society if it believes you are a risk to public health. It would be an open-ended invitation to full-blown Technocrat tyranny.
Using extortion-like rhetoric to force people into submission for vaccination, Technocrat Fauci now suggests that if you want to go to school or ever travel again, you must take the COVID-19 vaccine and show proof that you did so. In other words, you life will be worthless unless you comply.
World Economic Forum Founder and Executive Chairman Klaus Schwab has proposed using the overreaction to coronavirus to launch a worldwide "Great Reset." This Great Reset is about expanding government power and suppressing liberty worldwide.
Schwab envisions an authoritarian system where big business acts as a partner with government. Big business would exercise its government-granted monopoly powers to maximize value for "stakeholders," instead of shareholders. Stakeholders include the government, international organizations, the business itself, and "civil society."
Of course, government bureaucrats and politicians, together with powerful special interests, will decide who are, and are not, stakeholders, what is in stakeholders' interest, and what steps corporations must take to maximize stakeholder value. People's own wishes are not the priority.
The Great Reset will dramatically expand the surveillance state via real-time tracking. It will also mandate that people receive digital certificates in order to travel and even technology implanted in their bodies to monitor them.
Included in Schwab's proposal for surveillance is his idea to use brain scans and nanotechnology to predict, and if necessary, prevent, individuals' future behavior. This means that anyone whose brain is "scanned" could have his Second Amendment and other rights violated because a government bureaucrat determines the individual is going to commit a crime. The system of tracking and monitoring could be used to silence those expressing "dangerous" political views, such as that the Great Reset violates our God-given rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Based on what were clearly misused and incomplete statistics, the US, the UK, and much of Western Europe have led the world in stoking unprecedented hysteria, enforcing travel restrictions and lockdowns, including the closing of businesses and schools, and grinding the economies of the world to a halt either directly or indirectly – in a manner similar to but with an impact much greater than the US-led global "War on Terror" starting in 2001.
Pressure from "international organizations" like the World Health Organization (WHO) using its UN-affiliated platform to declare a "global pandemic," along with Western governments and the corporations that dominate foreign and domestic policy, has created a global crisis – not in terms of human health, but in terms of socioeconomics.
Businesses are closed – not because those who regularly run or patronize them are in hospital beds or dead – but by order of governments, and with official policy backing from organizations like the WHO.
The mainstream media has played a key role in this – not only repeating narratives provided by governments and healthcare institutions uncritically, but refusing to fulfill their role as watchdogs and investigators searching out impropriety.
It is a state of hysteria that is crippling small and medium-sized businesses (SME), but a boon to big-business.
A German study involving over 25,000 children reveals that major negative impacts on the physical, psychological, and behavioral health of children may be far more widespread than reported in the media and by government officials -- affecting approximately 68% and contributing to 24 distinct health complaints, according to parent submitted observations.
1984 being not only the year of George Orwell's dystopian novel, but also, as Henderson explained in our recent interview, the year Dr. Anthony Fauci became director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (according to Wikipedia). Thirty-four years of scaring the sheeple into accepting deadly "medical" solutions for fabricated diseases (starting with the fake AIDS pandemic).
To help reveal his "vast pathology of crimes against humanity," New Earth Media is live streaming a mock trial against Dr. Anthony Fauci, with lawyers Robert J. Kennedy and Rocco Galati. It happens tomorrow, Tuesday, January 5th, at 11am EST (4pm GMT).
A 41 year-old pediatric assistant in Portugal with no " illness or health complication," according to a local paper, died mysteriously two days after being injected with the Pfizer COVID vaccine. Portuguese health authorities are described as being "on alert."
The woman was one of 538 health workers who received the Pfizer vaccine last Wednesday. She was found dead in her bed by her partner on New Year's Day.
The report states that the man was administered the vaccine on Christmas eve, and soon complained of urethral and abdominal pain, before his blood pressure tanked and his pulse spiked. He died on Monday.
Swissmedic claims that the man already had multiple illnesses, and that the death probably isn't connected to the jab.
The incident comes after a 75-year-old Israeli man reportedly died from a heart attack just two hours after receiving the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine.
Israeli health authorities have claimed there is no link between the man's death and the vaccination, saying he had previous illnesses.
"A 75-year-old man from the north of the country suffering from active heart disease and malignant disease, who has undergone a number of heart attacks, was vaccinated this morning against the coronavirus and died at home shortly after the procedure," an Israeli Health Ministry statement read.
The two reported deaths come in the wake of many reports about adverse reactions to the vaccine globally.
This sit down interview with Catherine covers the spectrum of the current situation we find ourselves in. It was conducted as apart of the full length documentary. We are releasing the full interview for the betterment of public understanding of the situation.
BACKGROUND: In an effort to mitigate the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), North Carolina (NC) closed its K–12 public schools to in-person instruction on 03/14/2020. On 07/15/2020, NC’s governor announced schools could open via remote learning or a “hybrid” model that combined in-person and remote instruction. In August 2020, 56 of 115 NC school districts joined the ABC Science Collaborative (ABCs) to implement public health measures to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission and share lessons learned. We describe secondary transmission of SARS-CoV-2 within participating NC school districts during the first 9 weeks of in-person instruction in the 2020–2021 academic school year. METHODS: From 08/15/2020–10/23/2020, 11 of 56 school districts participating in ABCs were open for in-person instruction for all 9 weeks of the first quarter and agreed to track incidence and secondary transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Local health department staff adjudicated secondary transmission. Superintendents met weekly with ABCs faculty to share lessons learned and develop prevention methods. RESULTS: Over 9 weeks, 11 participating school districts had more than 90,000 students and staff attend school in-person; of these, there were 773 community-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infections documented by molecular testing. Through contact tracing, NC health department staff determined an additional 32 infections were acquired within schools. No instances of child-to-adult transmission of SARS-CoV-2 were reported within schools. CONCLUSIONS: In the first 9 weeks of in-person instruction in NC schools, we found extremely limited within-school secondary transmission of SARS-CoV-2, as determined by contact tracing.