Category: Activism

MUST READ: Dear Dr. Fauch

Open letter to Dr. Anthony Fauci regarding the use of Hydroxychloroquine for treating COVID-19 | Columnists | thedesertreview.com

Dear Dr. Fauci:

You were placed into the most high-profile role regarding America’s response to the coronavirus pandemic. Americans have relied on your medical expertise concerning the wearing of masks, resuming employment, returning to school, and of course medical treatment.

You are largely unchallenged in terms of your medical opinions. You are the de facto “COVID-19 Czar." This is unusual in the medical profession in which doctors’ opinions are challenged by other physicians in the form of exchanges between doctors at hospitals, medical conferences, as well as debate in medical journals. You render your opinions unchallenged, without formal public opposition from physicians who passionately disagree with you. It is incontestable that the public is best served when opinions and policy are based on the prevailing evidence and science, and able to withstand the scrutiny of medical professionals.

As experience accrued in treating COVID-19 infections, physicians worldwide discovered that high-risk patients can be treated successfully as an outpatient, within the first five to seven days of the onset of symptoms, with a “cocktail” consisting of hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and azithromycin (or doxycycline). Multiple scholarly contributions to the literature detail the efficacy of the hydroxychloroquine-based combination treatment.

Dr. Harvey Risch, the renowned Yale epidemiologist, published an article in May 2020 in the American Journal of Epidemiology titled “Early Outpatient Treatment of Symptomatic, High-Risk COVID-19 Patients that Should be Ramped-Up Immediately as Key to Pandemic Crisis." He further published an article in Newsweek in July 2020 for the general public expressing the same conclusions and opinions. Dr. Risch is an expert at evaluating research data and study designs, publishing over 300 articles. Dr Risch’s assessment is that there is unequivocal evidence for the early and safe use of the “HCQ cocktail.” If there are Q-T interval concerns, doxycycline can be substituted for azithromycin as it has activity against RNA viruses without any cardiac effects.

Yet, you continue to reject the use of hydroxychloroquine, except in a hospital setting in the form of clinical trials, repeatedly emphasizing the lack of evidence supporting its use. Hydroxychloroquine, despite 65 years of use for malaria, and over 40 years for lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, with a well-established safety profile, has been deemed by you and the FDA as unsafe for use in the treatment of symptomatic COVID-19 infections. Your opinions have influenced the thinking of physicians and their patients, medical boards, state and federal agencies, pharmacists, hospitals, and just about everyone involved in medical decision making.

Indeed, your opinions impacted the health of Americans, and many aspects of our day-to-day lives including employment and school. Those of us who prescribe hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and azithromycin/doxycycline believe fervently that early outpatient use would save tens of thousands of lives and enable our country to dramatically alter the response to COVID-19. We advocate for an approach that will reduce fear and allow Americans to get their lives back.

We hope that our questions compel you to reconsider your current approach to COVID-19 infection.

QUESTIONS REGARDING EARLY OUTPATIENT TREATMENT:

  1. There are generally two stages of COVID-19 symptomatic infection; initial flu like symptoms with progression to cytokine storm and respiratory failure, correct?
  2. When people are admitted to a hospital, they generally are in worse condition, correct?
  3. There are no specific medications currently recommended for early outpatient treatment of symptomatic COVID-19 infection, correct?
  4. Remdesivir and Dexamethasone are used for hospitalized patients, correct?
  5. There is currently no recommended pharmacologic early outpatient treatment for individuals in the flu stage of the illness, correct?
  6. It is true that COVID-19 is much more lethal than the flu for high-risk individuals such as older patients and those with significant comorbidities, correct?
  7. Individuals with signs of early COVID-19 infection typically have a runny nose, fever, cough, shortness of breath, loss of smell, etc., and physicians send them home to rest, eat chicken soup etc., but offer no specific, targeted medications, correct?
  8. These high-risk individuals are at high risk of death, on the order of 15 percent or higher, correct?
  9. So just so we are clear — the current standard of care now is to send clinically stable symptomatic patients home, “with a wait and see” approach?
  10. Are you aware that physicians are successfully using Hydroxychloroquine combined with Zinc and Azithromycin as a “cocktail” for early outpatient treatment of symptomatic, high-risk, individuals?
  11. Have you heard of the “Zelenko Protocol,” for treating high-risk patients with COVID-19 as an outpatient?
  12. Have you read Dr. Risch’s article in the American Journal of Epidemiology of the early outpatient treatment of COVID-19?
  13. Are you aware that physicians using the medication combination or “cocktail” recommend use within the first five to seven days of the onset of symptoms, before the illness impacts the lungs, or cytokine storm evolves?
  14. Again, to be clear, your recommendation is no pharmacologic treatment as an outpatient for the flu-like symptoms in patients that are stable, regardless of their risk factors, correct?
  15. Would you advocate for early pharmacologic outpatient treatment of symptomatic COVID-19 patients if you were confident that it was beneficial?
  16. Are you aware that there are hundreds of physicians in the United States and thousands across the globe who have had dramatic success treating high-risk individuals as outpatients with this “cocktail?”
  17. Are you aware that there are at least 10 studies demonstrating the efficacy of early outpatient treatment with the Hydroxychloroquine cocktail for high-risk patients — so this is beyond anecdotal, correct?
  18. If one of your loved ones had diabetes or asthma, or any potentially complicating comorbidity, and tested positive for COVID-19, would you recommend “wait and see how they do” and go to the hospital if symptoms progress?
  19. Even with multiple studies documenting remarkable outpatient efficacy and safety of the Hydroxychloroquine “cocktail,” you believe the risks of the medication combination outweigh the benefits?
  20. Is it true that with regard to Hydroxychloroquine and treatment of COVID-19 infection, you have said repeatedly that “The Overwhelming Evidence of Properly Conducted Randomized Clinical Trials Indicate No Therapeutic Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)?”
  21. But NONE of the randomized controlled trials to which you refer were done in the first five to seven days after the onset of symptoms, correct?
  22. All of the randomized controlled trials to which you refer were done on hospitalized patients, correct?
  23. Hospitalized patients are typically sicker that outpatients, correct?
  24. None of the randomized controlled trials to which you refer used the full cocktail consisting of Hydroxychloroquine, Zinc, and Azithromycin, correct?
  25. While the University of Minnesota study is referred to as disproving the cocktail, the meds were not given within the first five to seven days of illness, the test group was not high risk (death rates were 3 percent), and no zinc was given, correct?
  26. Again, for clarity, the trials upon which you base your opinion regarding the efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine, assessed neither the full cocktail (to include Zinc and Azithromycin or doxycycline) nor administered treatment within the first five to seven days of symptoms, nor focused on the high-risk group, correct?
  27. Therefore, you have no basis to conclude that the Hydroxychloroquine cocktail when used early in the outpatient setting, within the first five to seven days of symptoms, in high risk patients, is not effective, correct?
  28. It is thus false and misleading to say that the effective and safe use of hydroxychloroquine, Zinc, and Azithromycin has been “debunked,” correct? How could it be “debunked” if there is not a single study that contradicts its use?
  29. Should it not be an absolute priority for the NIH and CDC to look at ways to treat Americans with symptomatic COVID-19 infections early to prevent disease progression?
  30. The SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 virus is an RNA virus. It is well-established that Zinc interferes with RNA viral replication, correct?
  31. Moreover, is it not true that hydroxychloroquine facilitates the entry of zinc into the cell, is a “ionophore,” correct?
  32. Isn’t also it true that Azithromycin has established anti-viral properties?
  33. Are you aware of the paper from Baylor by Dr. McCullough et. al. describing established mechanisms by which the components of the “HCQ cocktail” exert anti-viral effects?
  34. So, the use of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin (or doxycycline), and zinc — the “HCQ cocktail” — is based on science, correct?

QUESTIONS REGARDING SAFETY:

  1. The FDA writes the following: “In light of on-going serious cardiac adverse events and their serious side effects, the known and potential benefits of CQ and HCQ no longer outweigh the known and potential risks for authorized use.” So not only is the FDA saying that hydroxychloroquine doesn’t work, they are also saying that it is a very dangerous drug. Yet, is it not true the drug has been used as an anti-malarial drug for over 65 years?
  2. Isn’t it true that the drug has been used for lupus and rheumatoid arthritis for many years at similar doses?
  3. Do you know of even a single study prior to COVID-19 that has provided definitive evidence against the use of the drug based on safety concerns?
  4. Are you aware that chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine has many approved uses for hydroxychloroquine including steroid-dependent asthma (1988 study), advanced pulmonary sarcoidosis (1988 study), sensitizing breast cancer cells for chemotherapy (2012 study), the attenuation of renal ischemia (2018 study), lupus nephritis (2006 study), epithelial ovarian cancer (2020 study), just to name a few? Where are the cardiotoxicity concerns ever mentioned?
  5. Risch estimates the risk of cardiac death from hydroxychloroquine to be 9/100,000 using the data provided by the FDA. That does not seem to be a high risk, considering the risk of death in an older patient with co-morbidities can be 15 percent or more. Do you consider 9/100,000 to be a high risk when weighed against the risk of death in older patient with co-morbidities?
  6. To put this in perspective, the drug is used for 65 years, without warnings (aside for the need for periodic retinal checks), but the FDA somehow feels the need to send out an alert on June 15, that the drug is dangerous. Does that make any logical sense to you Dr. Fauci based on “science”?
  7. Moreover, consider that the protocols for usage in early treatment are for five to seven days at relatively low doses of hydroxychloroquine similar to what is being given in other diseases (RA, SLE) over many years — does it make any sense to you logically that a five to seven day dose of hydroxychloroquine when not given in high doses could be considered dangerous?
  8. You are also aware that articles published in the New England Journal of Medicine and Lancet, one out of Harvard University, regarding the dangers of hydroxychloroquine had to be retracted based on the fact that the data was fabricated. Are you aware of that?
  9. If there was such good data on the risks of hydroxychloroquine, one would not have to use fake data, correct?
  10. After all, 65 years is a long-time to determine whether or not a drug is safe, do you agree?
  11. In the clinical trials that you have referenced (e.g., the Minnesota and the Brazil studies), there was not a single death attributed directly to hydroxychloroquine, correct?
  12. According to Dr. Risch, there is no evidence based on the data to conclude that hydroxychloroquine is a dangerous drug. Are you aware of any published report that rebuts Dr. Risch’s findings?
  13. Are you aware that the FDA ruling along with your statements have led to Governors in a number of states to restrict the use of hydroxychloroquine?
  14. Are you aware that pharmacies are not filling prescriptions for this medication based on your and the FDA’s restrictions?
  15. Are you aware that doctors are being punished by state medical boards for prescribing the medication based on your comments as well as the FDA’s?
  16. Are you aware that people who want the medication sometimes need to call physicians in other states pleading for it?
  17. And yet you opined in March that while people were dying at the rate of 10,000 patients a week, hydroxychloroquine could only be used in an inpatient setting as part of a clinical trial- correct?
  18. So, people who want to be treated in that critical five- to seven-day period and avoid being hospitalized are basically out of luck in your view, correct?
  19. So, again, for clarity, without a shred of evidence that the hydroxychloroquine/HCQ cocktail is dangerous in the doses currently recommend for early outpatient treatment, you and the FDA have made it very difficult, if not impossible in some cases, to get this treatment, correct?

QUESTIONS REGARDING METHODOLOGY:

  1. In regards to the use of hydroxychloroquine, you have repeatedly made the same statement: “The Overwhelming Evidence from Properly Conducted Randomized Clinical Trials Indicate no Therapeutic Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine.” Is that correct?
  2. In Dr. Risch’s article regarding the early use of hydroxychloroquine, he disputes your opinion. He scientifically evaluated the data from the studies to support his opinions. Have you published any articles to support your opinions?
  3. You repeatedly state that randomized clinical trials are needed to make conclusions regarding treatments, correct?
  4. The FDA has approved many medications (especially in the area of cancer treatment) without randomized clinical trials, correct?
  5. Are you aware that Dr. Thomas Frieden, the previous head of the CDC wrote an article in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2017 called “Evidence for Health Decision Making — Beyond Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT)?” Have you read that article?
  6. In it Dr. Frieden states that “many data sources can provide valid evidence for clinical and public health action, including analysis of aggregate clinical or epidemiological data.” Do you disagree with that?
  7. Frieden discusses “practiced-based evidence” as being essential in many discoveries, such SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome). Do you disagree with that?
  8. Frieden writes the following: “Current evidence-grading systems are biased toward randomized clinical trials, which may lead to inadequate consideration of non-RCT data.” Dr. Fauci, have you considered all the non-RCT data in coming to your opinions?
  9. Risch, who is a leading world authority in the analysis of aggregate clinical data, has done a rigorous analysis that he published regarding the early treatment of COVID-19 with hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and azithromycin. He cites five or six studies, and in an updated article there are five or six more, a total of 10 to 12 clinical studies with formally collected data specifically regarding the early treatment of COVID. Have you analyzed the aggregate data regarding early treatment of high-risk patients with hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and azithromycin?
  10. Is there any document that you can produce for the American people of your analysis of the aggregate data that would rebut Dr. Risch’s analysis?
  11. Yet, despite what Dr. Risch believes is overwhelming evidence in support of the early use of hydroxychloroquine, you dismiss the treatment insisting on randomized controlled trials even in the midst of a pandemic?
  12. Would you want a loved one with high-risk comorbidities placed in the control group of a randomized clinical trial when a number of studies demonstrate safety and dramatic efficacy of the early use of the hydroxychloroquine “cocktail?”
  13. Are you aware that the FDA approved a number of cancer chemotherapy drugs without randomized control trials based solely on epidemiological evidence? The trials came later as confirmation. Are you aware of that?
  14. You are well aware that there were no randomized clinical trials in the case of penicillin that saved thousands of lives in World War II? Was not this in the best interest of our soldiers?
  15. You would agree that many lives were saved with the use of cancer drugs and penicillin that were used before any randomized clinical trials, correct?
  16. You have referred to evidence for hydroxychloroquine as “anecdotal,” which is defined as “evidence collected in a casual or informal manner and relying heavily or entirely on personal testimony,” correct?
  17. But there are many studies supporting the use of hydroxychloroquine in which evidence was collected formally and not on personal testimony, has there not been?
  18. So, it would be false to conclude that the evidence supporting the early use of hydroxychloroquine is anecdotal, correct?

COMPARISON BETWEEN U.S. AND OTHER COUNTRIES REGARDING CASE FATALITY RATE:

(IT WOULD BE VERY HELPFUL TO HAVE THE GRAPHS COMPARING OUR CASE FATALITY RATES TO OTHER COUNTRIES.)

  1. Are you aware that countries like Senegal and Nigeria that use hydroxychloroquine have much lower case-fatality rates than the United States?
  2. Have you pondered the relationship between the use of hydroxychloroquine by a given country and their case mortality rate and why there is a strong correlation between the use of HCQ and the reduction of the case mortality rate.?
  3. Have you considered consulting with a country such as India that has had great success treating COVID-19 prophylactically?
  4. Why shouldn’t our first responders and front-line workers who are at high risk at least have an option of HCQ/zinc prophylaxis?
  5. We should all agree that countries with far inferior healthcare delivery systems should not have lower case fatality rates. Reducing our case fatality rate from near 5 percent, to 2.5 percent, in line with many countries who use HCQ early would have cut our total number of deaths in half, correct?
  6. Why not consult with countries who have lower case-fatality rates, even without expensive medicines such as remdesivir and far less advanced intensive care capabilities?

GIVING AMERICANS THE OPTION TO USE HCQ FOR COVID-19:

  1. Harvey Risch, the pre-eminent epidemiologist from Yale, wrote a Newsweek Article titled: “The key to defeating COVID-19 already exists. We need to start using it.” Did you read the article?
  2. Are you aware that the cost of the hydroxychloroquine “cocktail” including the Z-pack and zinc is about $50?
  3. You are aware the cost of remdesivir is about $3,200?
  4. So that’s about 60 doses of HCQ “cocktail,” correct?
  5. In fact, President Trump had the foresight to amass 60 million doses of hydroxychloroquine, and yet you continue to stand in the way of doctors who want to use that medication for their infected patients, correct?
  6. Those are a lot of doses of medication that potentially could be used to treat our poor, especially our minority populations and people of color that have a difficult time accessing healthcare. They die more frequently of COVID-19, do they not?
  7. But because of your obstinance blocking the use of HCQ, this stockpile has remained largely unused, correct?
  8. Would you acknowledge that your strategy of telling Americans to restrict their behavior, wear masks, and distance, and put their lives on hold indefinitely until there is a vaccine is not working?
  9. So, 160,000 deaths later, an economy in shambles, kids out of school, suicides and drug overdoses at a record high, people neglected and dying from other medical conditions, and America reacting to every outbreak with another lockdown — is it not time to re-think your strategy that is fully dependent on an effective vaccine?
  10. Why not consider a strategy that protects the most vulnerable and allows Americans back to living their lives and not wait for a vaccine panacea that may never come?
  11. Why not consider the approach that thousands of doctors around the world are using, supported by a number of studies in the literature, with early outpatient treatment of high-risk patients for typically one week with HCQ + zinc + azithromycin?
  12. You don’t see a problem with the fact that the government, due to your position, in some cases interferes with the choice of using HCQ. Should not that be a choice between the doctor and the patient?
  13. While some doctors may not want to use the drug, should not doctors who believe that it is indicated be able to offer it to their patients?
  14. Are you aware that doctors who are publicly advocating for such a strategy with the early use of the HCQ cocktail are being silenced with removal of content on the internet and even censorship in the medical community?
  15. You are aware of the 20 or so physicians who came to the Supreme Court steps advocating for the early use of the hydroxychloroquine cocktail. In fact, you said these were “a bunch of people spouting out something that isn’t true.” Dr. Fauci, these are not just “people,” these are doctors who actually treat patients, unlike you, correct?
  16. Do you know that the video they made went viral with 17 million views in just a few hours, and was then removed from the internet?
  17. Are you aware that their website, American Frontline Doctors, was taken down the next day?
  18. Did you see the way that Nigerian immigrant physician, Dr. Stella Immanuel, was mocked in the media for her religious views and called a “witch doctor?”
  19. Are you aware that Dr. Simone Gold, the leader of the group, was fired from her job as an Emergency Room physician the following day?
  20. Are you aware that physicians advocating for this treatment that has by now probably saved millions of lives around the globe are harassed by local health departments, state agencies and medical boards, and even at their own hospitals? Are you aware of that?
  21. Don’t you think doctors should have the right to speak out on behalf of their patients without the threat of retribution?
  22. Are you aware that videos and other educational information are removed off the internet and labeled, in the words of Mark Zuckerberg, as “misinformation?”
  23. Is it not misinformation to characterize hydroxychloroquine, in the doses used for early outpatient treatment of COVID-19 infections, as a dangerous drug?
  24. Is it not misleading for you to repeatedly state to the American public that randomized clinical trials are the sole source of information to confirm the efficacy of a treatment?
  25. Was it not misinformation when on CNN you cited the Lancet study based on false data from Surgisphere as evidence of the lack of efficacy of hydroxychloroquine?
  26. Is it not misinformation as is repeated in the MSM as a result of your comments that a randomized clinical trial is required by the FDA for a drug approval?
  27. Don’t you realize how much damage this falsehood perpetuates?
  28. How is it not misinformation for you and the FDA to keep telling the American public that hydroxychloroquine is dangerous when you know that there is nothing more than anecdotal evidence of that?
  29. Fauci, if you or a loved one were infected with COVID-19, and had flu-like symptoms, and you knew as you do now, that there is a safe and effective cocktail that you could take to prevent worsening and the possibility of hospitalization, can you honestly tell us that you would refuse the medication?
  30. Why not give our healthcare workers and first responders, who even with the necessary PPE are contracting the virus at a three to four times greater rate than the general public, the right to choose along with their doctor if they want to use the medicine prophylactically?
  31. Why is the government inserting itself in a way that is unprecedented in regard to a historically safe medication and not allowing patients the right to choose along with their doctor?
  32. Why not give the American people the right to decide along with their physician whether or not they want outpatient treatment in the first five to seven days of the disease with a cocktail that is safe and costs around $50?

FINAL QUESTIONS:

  1. Fauci, please explain how a randomized clinical trial, to which you repeatedly make reference, for testing the HCQ cocktail (hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and zinc) administered within five to seven days of the onset of symptoms is even possible now given the declining case numbers in so many states?
  2. For example, if the NIH were now to direct a study to begin September 15, where would such a study be done?
  3. Please explain how a randomized study on the early treatment (within the first five to seven days of symptoms) of high-risk, symptomatic COVID-19 infections could be done during the influenza season and be valid?
  4. Please explain how multiple observational studies arrive at the same outcomes using the same formulation of hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin + zinc given in the same time frame for the same study population (high risk patients) is not evidence that the cocktail works?
  5. In fact, how is it not significant evidence, during a pandemic, for hundreds of non-academic private practice physicians to achieve the same outcomes with the early use of the HCQ cocktail?
  6. What is your recommendation for the medical management of a 75-year-old diabetic with fever, cough, and loss of smell, but not yet hypoxic, who Emergency Room providers do not feel warrants admission? We know that hundreds of US physicians (and thousands more around the world) would manage this case with the HCQ cocktail with predictable success.
  7. If you were in charge in 1940, would you have advised the mass production of penicillin based primarily on lab evidence and one case series on five patients in England, or would you have stated that a randomized clinical trial was needed?
  8. Why would any physician put their medical license, professional reputation, and job on the line to recommend the HCQ cocktail — that does not make them any money — unless they knew the treatment could significantly help their patient?
  9. Why would a physician take the medication themselves and prescribe it to family members (for treatment or prophylaxis) unless they felt strongly that the medication was beneficial?
  10. How is it informed and ethical medical practice to allow a COVID-19 patient to deteriorate in the early stages of the infection when there is inexpensive, safe, and dramatically effective treatment with the HCQ cocktail, which the science indicates interferes with coronavirus replication?
  11. How is your approach to “wait and see” in the early stages of COVID-19 infection, especially in high-risk patients, following the science?

While previous questions are related to hydroxychloroquine-based treatment, we have two questions addressing masks.

  1. As you recall, you stated on March 8, just a few weeks before the devastation in the Northeast, that masks weren’t needed. You later said that you made this statement to prevent a hoarding of masks that would disrupt availability to healthcare workers. Why did you not make a recommendation for people to wear any face covering to protect themselves, as we are doing now?
  2. Rather, you issued no such warning and people were riding in subways and visiting their relatives in nursing homes without any face covering. Currently, your position is that face coverings are essential. Please explain whether or not you made a mistake in early March, and how would you go about it differently now.

CONCLUSION:

Since the start of the pandemic, physicians have used hydroxychloroquine to treat symptomatic COVID-19 infections, as well as for prophylaxis. Initial results were mixed as indications and doses were explored to maximize outcomes and minimize risks. What emerged was that hydroxychloroquine appeared to work best when coupled with azithromycin. In fact, it was the president of the United States who recommended to you publicly at the beginning of the pandemic, in early March, that you should consider early treatment with hydroxychloroquine and a “Z-Pack.” Additional studies showed that patients did not seem to benefit when COVID-19 infections were treated with hydroxychloroquine late in the course of the illness, typically in a hospital setting, but treatment was consistently effective, even in high-risk patients, when hydroxychloroquine was given in a “cocktail” with azithromycin and, critically, zinc in the first five to seven days after the onset of symptoms. The outcomes are, in fact, dramatic.

As clearly presented in the McCullough article from Baylor, and described by Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, the efficacy of the HCQ cocktail is based on the pharmacology of the hydroxychloroquine ionophore acting as the “gun” and zinc as the “bullet,” while azithromycin potentiates the anti-viral effect. Undeniably, the hydroxychloroquine combination treatment is supported by science. Yet, you continue to ignore the “science” behind the disease. Viral replication occurs rapidly in the first five to seven days of symptoms and can be treated at that point with the HCQ cocktail. Rather, your actions have denied patients treatment in that early stage. Without such treatment, some patients, especially those at high risk with co-morbidities, deteriorate and require hospitalization for evolving cytokine storm resulting in pneumonia, respiratory failure, and intubation with 50% mortality. Dismissal of the science results in bad medicine, and the outcome is over 160,000 dead Americans. Countries that have followed the science and treated the disease in the early stages have far better results, a fact that has been concealed from the American Public.

Despite mounting evidence and impassioned pleas from hundreds of frontline physicians, your position was and continues to be that randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have not shown there to be benefit. However, not a single randomized control trial has tested what is being recommended: use of the full cocktail (especially zinc), in high-risk patients, initiated within the first 5 to 7 days of the onset of symptoms. Using hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin late in the disease process, with or without zinc, does not produce the same, unequivocally positive results.

Dr. Thomas Frieden, in a 2017 New England Journal of Medicine article regarding randomized clinical trials, emphasized there are situations in which it is entirely appropriate to use other forms of evidence to scientifically validate a treatment. Such is the case during a pandemic that moves like a brushfire jumping to different parts of the country. Insisting on randomized clinical trials in the midst of a pandemic is simply foolish. Dr. Harvey Risch, a world-renowned Yale epidemiologist, analyzed all the data regarding the use of the hydroxychloroquine/HCQ cocktail and concluded that the evidence of its efficacy when used early in COVID-19 infection is unequivocal.

Curiously, despite a 65+ years safety record, the FDA suddenly deemed hydroxychloroquine a dangerous drug, especially with regard to cardiotoxicity. Dr. Risch analyzed data provided by the FDA and concluded that the risk of a significant cardiac event from hydroxychloroquine is extremely low, especially when compared to the mortality rate of COVID-19 patients with high-risk co-morbidities. How do you reconcile that for forty years rheumatoid arthritis and lupus patients have been treated over long periods, often for years, with hydroxychloroquine and now there are suddenly concerns about a 5 to 7-day course of hydroxychloroquine at similar or slightly increased doses? The FDA statement regarding hydroxychloroquine and cardiac risk is patently false and alarmingly misleading to physicians, pharmacists, patients, and other health professionals. The benefits of the early use of hydroxychloroquine to prevent hospitalization in high-risk patients with COVID-19 infection far outweigh the risks. Physicians are not able to obtain the medication for their patients, and in some cases are restricted by their state from prescribing hydroxychloroquine. The government’s obstruction of the early treatment of symptomatic high-risk COVID-19 patients with hydroxychloroquine, a medication used extensively and safely for so long, is unprecedented.

It is essential that you tell the truth to the American public regarding the safety and efficacy of the hydroxychloroquine/HCQ cocktail. The government must protect and facilitate the sacred and revered physician-patient relationship by permitting physicians to treat their patients. Governmental obfuscation and obstruction are as lethal as cytokine storm.

Americans must not continue to die unnecessarily. Adults must resume employment and our youth return to school. Locking down America while awaiting an imperfect vaccine has done far more damage to Americans than the coronavirus. We are confident that thousands of lives would be saved with early treatment of high-risk individuals with a cocktail of hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and azithromycin. Americans must not live in fear. As Dr. Harvey Risch’s Newsweek article declares, “The key to defeating COVID-19 already exists. We need to start using it.”

Very Respectfully,

George C. Fareed, MD

Brawley, California

Michael M. Jacobs, MD, MPH

Pensacola, Florida

Donald C. Pompan, MD

Salinas, California

Coronavirus (COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2) news and resources - index

You can download the video and documents used in making The Plan at the Stop World Control website.

Note: I am no longer updating this archive on a regular basis, however articles regarding COVID-19, the alleged SARS-CoV-2 "virus" and the so-called "vaccines" will continue to be published in the posts on the front page and can be readily found in the health category of articles.

Introduction

covid-19 vaccine injuries, 2021When one reviews the evidence, there can be no doubt that the COVID-19 "pandemic" is a Trojan Horse which is being used to implement a plethora of Orwellian, technocratic and transhumanist agendas as dictated by the globalists. Bill Gates, a eugenicist, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum, the pharmaceutical industry, the World Health Organization (WHO), of which Gates is one of the largest funders, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the United Nations and others. Promoting and profiting from the contrived COVID-19 "pandemic" are governments around the world, 'Big Tech' and the mainstream media, all of which rely upon several large corporations including Anser, Fors Marsh, Publicis Sapient and Palantir (video).

Understanding the bigger picture is far more important than anything having to do with the repercussions of an alleged virus with a greater than 99% survival rate without any treatment (survival rate approaches 100% with proper treatment, such as hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, high-dose vitamin C and zinc) and which has never been properly isolated according to various scientists, doctors, researchers, the CDC and, as of 30-Jul-2021, 90 institutions and offices in 24 countries/jurisdictions around the world (archived copy).

These pages are dedicated to exposing the truth and presenting science, data and commentary which challenge the mainstream narratives regarding the SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 "pandemic". The information presented here is sourced largely from creditable sources including various healthcare professionals, scientists, whistleblowers, independent journalists and researchers.

Treating adverse effects of the COVID (and potentially other) vaccines

Primary resources

Quotes from healthcare professionals

"All myths of the prevailing corona narrative are made up out of a fact-free vacuum." -- Dr. Thomas Binder, immunologist, cardiologist (source)

"The bottom line is simply this: There is utterly unfounded public hysteria driven by the media and politicians. It's outrageous. This is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspecting public. There is absolutely nothing that can be done to contain this virus. Other than protecting older, more vulnerable people. It should be thought of as nothing more than a bad flu season. This is not Ebola. It's not SARS. It's politics playing medicine and that's a very dangerous game." -- Dr. Roger Hodkinson, MA, MB, FRCPC, FCAP, CEO, medical director of Western Medical Assessments, during a speech at Edmonton City Council Community and Public Services Committee, 13-Nov-2020 (source)

"Let's make sure we are clear… This is not a vaccine. They are using the term "vaccine" to sneak this thing under public health exemptions. This is not a vaccine." -- Dr. David Martin (source)

"This vaccination agenda and program is the greatest threat to humanity." -- German microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi (source)

"Zero justification for using this poison death shot." -- Dr. Vladimir Zelenko (source)

"If you don't agree with Authority, no matter what deductive process/evidence used... this is now a mental disorder." -- Ethical Skeptic (source)

"[...] no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available [...]" -- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 13-Jul-2020 (source)

"It's a disease so powerful you have to get tested to know whether or not you have it." -- Ryan Dawson, researcher, activist, Anti-Neocon Report (ANC) (source)

"The truth is [...] this is a crime against humanity. This is happening all over the world and America needs to take a leadership role and stop the countries like ours that are limiting hydroxychloroquine. It's killing people not to have access." -- Simone Gold, MD, JD, FABEM, Board Certified Emergency Physician (source)

"The adverse events from Remdesivir [...] are the primary cause of death in all intensive care units treating supposed COVID-19 patients -- multiple organ failure, kidneys shutting down, lungs filling with fluid, pneumonia ... But the pathologies are attributed to C19, not Remdesivir." -- Dr. Randy Wysong, BS, DVM (source)

Mask provides no protection against COVID-19

"By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain." -- Russell Blaylock, MD (source)

"Wearing a mask is like advertising you failed your IQ test." -- Simone Gold, MD, JD, FABEM, Board Certified Emergency Physician (source)

"Seriously people- STOP BUYING MASKS! They are NOT effective in preventing general public from catching #Coronavirus [...]" -- U.S. Surgen General (source)

"In our systematic review, we identified 10 RCTs that reported estimates of the effectiveness of face masks in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the community from literature published during 1946–July 27, 2018. In pooled analysis, we found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks" -- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (source)

"The level of stupidity going on here is amazing." -- Michael Levitt, biophysicist, professor of structural biology, Nobel laureate, Stanford University (source)

"Hardly anyone has died from COVID-19." -- Dr. Rashid A. Buttar, DO, FAAPM, FACAM, FAAIM (source)

"[The PCR test is] as good as that Scientology test that detects your personality and then tells you need to give all your money to Scientology." -- Dr. David Rasnick, Ph.D., Biochemist, Protease Inhibitor developer, University of California (source)

"COVID-19 PCR tests are scientifically meaningless" -- Bulgarian Pathology Association (source)

"[Surgical masks/cloth face coverings] Will not protect the wearer against airborne transmissible infectious agents due to loose fit and lack of seal or inadequate filtration." -- OSHA, COVID-19 Frequently Asked Questions (source)

"There have been extensive randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies, and meta-analysis reviews of RCT studies, which all show that masks and respirators do not work to prevent respiratory influenza-like illnesses, or respiratory illnesses believed to be transmitted by droplets and aerosol particles." -- Denis G. Rancourt, Ph.D, Researcher, Ontario Civil Liberties Association (ocla.ca) (source)

"We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection." -- New England Journal of Medicine (source)

"It’s all bullshit […] It’s all exaggerated. It’s an acute respiratory disease with minimal mortality […] Why has the whole world been destroyed?" -- Dr. Alexander Myasnikov, Russia's head of coronavirus information (source)

"These people are not dying from Covid." -- Erin Marie Olszewski, registered nurse, Iraq combat veteran, Elmhurst hospital, New York (source)

"If a patient with a knife sticking out of their chest had sneezed within 14 days of their death then they died of coronavirus." -- Dr. Vernon Coleman (source)

Important videos

The Unseen Crisis: Vaccine Stories You Were Never Told (A COVID-19 Documentary)

In the climate of a global pandemic, COVID-19 vaccines were rolled out under emergency use authorization after a much shorter than normal testing period. Millions of people rolled up their sleeves because they were told they were doing their part to end the pandemic. But for some -- it didn't go as expected.

The Unseen Crisis is a feature-length documentary that provides an intimate, uncensored look into the lives of those who live with the debilitating after-effects of the COVID-19 vaccines. It examines the issue of COVID-19 vaccine injury claims in a fresh, honest, and comprehensive manner with expert interviews, whistleblowers' statements, and government health statistics.

This is a documentary about people, not politics.

The patients in the documentary suffered severe reactions to the shot and their health spiraled out of control. When they reached out to the public health system and pharmaceutical companies for help and support, instead of being acknowledged, cared for, and studied; they were ignored, censored, and called "anti-vaxxers" despite having gotten the shot. These patients are by no means isolated cases. The world is witnessing a growing epidemic of COVID-19 vaccine injuries that can no longer be ignored.

Fortunately, a small community of doctors are bravely trying to unravel the mystery of these injuries and how to treat them. They too were shocked to find themselves shut out of the mainstream medical community, simply for practicing what every doctor is trained to do.

But ultimately, The Unseen Crisis is a story of hope and triumph. In spite of everything, this group has learned to rely on themselves and work together to find relief. Determined, principled, and surprisingly positive, they truly embody the resilient American spirit.

For those suffering in silence, hope begins with having a voice. The "Unseen Crisis" finally gives them one.

Official Website:
https://www.UnseenCrisis.com

There's No Proof Of Contagious Viruses Causing Disease; Drs Cowan, Bailey, Lanka, Kaufman

Dr. David Martin - Follow the Patents, Then You Will Understand Covid

COVID Vaccine Secrets - What We Know - And May Never Know - About COVID Vaccines

Understanding Dr Fauci

Kary Mullis (Full Interview) PCR Test Inventor on Science, FDA, AIDS, Fauci...

Gary Null interviewed Kary Mullis in May of 1996 for a documentary on AIDS. Mullis won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993 for his invention of PCR. He offers his views on a number of subjects from how AIDS was handled by the medial establishment to the scientific method and the integrity of public health officials and the publishers of scientific publications.

CRITICALLY IMPORTANT INTERVIEW regarding the COVID-19 "vaccines" with Karen Kingston, former Pfizer analyst

Karen Kingston-Stew Peters interview, slide 3, 2021.07.28
Karen Kingston-Stew Peters interview, slide 3, 2021.07.28

Stew Peters With Karen Kingston - Former Pfizer Employee Confirms Poison in COVID 'Kill Shot'

Karen Kingston, a former Pfizer employee and current analyst for the pharmaceutical and medical device industries, came forward with indisputable documentation that should be shared with the ENTIRE WORLD!

Key talking points:

  • all of the COVID-19 "vaccines" are bioweapons
  • there are 4 PEGylated lipid nano particles in the COVID-19 vaccines (PEG = polyethylene glycol):
    1. a cholesterol lipid enables the vaccine ingredients to be transported by the blood
    2. the fossil lipid adheres to the cell membrane to make it permeable
    3. an ionizable lipid provides a positive ionic charge so the mRNA can enter the cell
    4. a PEGylated lipid made by SINOPEG, a Chinese company
  • mRNA is very unstable, thus it needs a "biosphere" to protect it until it can enter the cell - this is provided by the lipid nano particles and graphene oxide which is 4,000 time stronger than titanium, can withstand 1,700 F temperatures, is an excellent conductor of electricity, and can host a magnetic field
  • graphene oxide is not listed in the patent applications because a), it is poisonous to humans and b), because it is the main ingredient in hydrogel which can be used to create a brain-computer interface and a drug delivery system, though Kingston notes that this is not possible "with this round [of vaccines]" because "they rushed this thing out" and "they're just seeing how much they can put into people before they... die"
    the graphene oxide in the vaccines is neutrally charged (inactive), however if/when it becomes positively charged, such as by electromagnetic radiation (radio frequency, such as wireless devices, wireless networks such as 5G, etc.), it will annihilate anything it comes into contact with and therefore can cause great damage and death depending on how much of it exists in the body and where it is located
  • multiple COVID-19 "vaccines" and booster shots may increase the amount of graphene oxide in the body
  • the COVID-19 vaccine study should have been stopped when, during a study with mice, 80% died within 24 hours and the remainder died within the next few days

History, Ingredients & Dangers of the CoVid Jab - Karen Kingston, former Pfizer analyst (part 1) | Doug Billings

15th July, 2021 - Here is Part 1 of a 6 part interview with Karen Kingston. Here she details the history, ingredients and dangers of the CoVid jab.

History, Ingredients & Dangers of the CoVid Jab Part 2 - Karen Kingston | Doug Billings

16th July, 2021 - Here is Part 2 of a 6 part interview with Karen Kingston. Here she continues detailing the history, ingredients and dangers of the CoVid jab.

Why the JAB Does NOT Work + Nuremberg Trials - Karen Kingston | Doug Billings

20th July, 2021 - Here is Part 3 of 6 of Doug Billings interview with Karen Kingston. Karen Kingston gives her reasons why the JAB does not work, including the need for Nuremberg Trials for those responsible for CoVid19.

Creators of CoVid19 & Jab: GUILTY of Crimes Against Humanity - Karen Kingston | Doug Billings

21st July, 2021 - Here is Part 4 of 6 of Doug Billings interview of Karen Kingston. Here she outlines her reasons why the creators of CoVid19 and the Jab are guilty of Crimes against Humanity.

The Truth About the Jab - It contains a poison: Graphene Oxide - Karen Kingston | Doug Billings

26th July, 2021 - Here is Part 5 of 6 of Doug Billings interview with Karen Kingston. Karen Kingston details what is contained in the jab.

Key talking points:

  • the 'delta' variant is not a mutation of SARS-CoV-2; it is the spike protein which is created by the cells as a result of the mRNA in the "vaccines"
  • while mainstream media promotes the Pfizer "vaccine" as being 88% effective against the alleged delta variant, approximately a week earlier the Cleveland Clinic stated that 50% of COVID-19 cases are in vaccinated people - this is further evidence that the disease is a result of the spike protein (12bytes says: See also: CDC Says 74% of Delta Cases are among Vaccinated, Which Means the ‘Vaccines’ Don’t Work)
  • antibodies produced by the "vaccine" do not bind with SARS-CoV-2 (they are ineffective against the alleged virus)
  • FDA announced that the PCR test used to detect SARS-CoV-2 has failed review and that it's Emergency Use Authorization has been revoked - this was a Class 1 recall, the most serious kind of revocation - PCR is the "test" that started the "pandemic" and was the only test used until May of 2020 (12bytes says: the wildly inaccurate rtPCR "test" continues to be used as of 2-Aug-2021)
  • PCR is owned by the NIH and vaccine manufacturers
  • various documents (patents, publications, FDA filings) use the terms nCov (novel coronavirus), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 (the symptoms of the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus) interchangeably and this creates confusion since they are not interchangeable
  • COVID-19 vaccine shedding is not a myth - the spike protein (a synthetic toxin) which is produced as a result of the "vaccine" can be transmitted among humans - this is clearly stated in a document from the FDA titled 'Design and Analysis of Shedding Studies for Virus or Bacteria-Based Gene Therapy and Oncolytic Products' which is about shedding from mRNA type vaccines:

The Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER)/Office of Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies (OCTGT) is issuing this guidance to provide you, sponsors of virus or bacteria-based gene therapy products (VBGT products) 1 and oncolytic viruses or bacteria (oncolytic products) 2 with recommendations on how to conduct shedding studies during preclinical and clinical development. For purposes of this guidance, the term “shedding” means release of VBGT or oncolytic products from the patient through one or all of the following ways: excreta (feces); secreta (urine, saliva, nasopharyngeal fluids etc.); or through the skin (pustules, sores, wounds). Shedding is distinct from biodistribution because the latter describes how a product is spread within the patient’s body from the site of administration while the former describes how it is excreted or released from the patient’s body. Shedding raises the possibility of transmission of VBGT or oncolytic products3 from treated to untreated individuals (e.g., close contacts and health care professionals).

  • the COVID-19 "vaccines" are in fact, by definition, gene therapies - they are not vaccines - Karen states, "According to the FDA gene therapy are all products that mediate their effect by transcription. What is this vaccine? It is recombinant, modified RNA that, through reverse transcription, produced a modified spike protein."
  • the EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) COVID-19 "vaccines" are called vaccines rather than gene therapy because the risk of manufacturers' liability is extremely high with gene therapies, even in clinical trials, whereas the risk of liability for damages caused by vaccines is virtually non-existent (12bytes says: Vaccine manufacturers were granted blanket immunity from liability by the U.S. Congress in 1986.) - the Emergency Use Authorization declaration further reduces liability
  • gene therapies are extremely risky and the potential long term damages are unknown - Karen states "As far as people saying this didn't have a lot of risk, I have the animal studies. The animals all died. They knew this was very risky. OK. And we also have the evidence from the article of all the masterminds talking to each other saying how frustrated they are because they have great in vitro - like petri dish data - but when they go to the animals they all die, so they wanna go straight to humans."
  • the COVID-19 "vaccines" are bioweapons
  • Karen cites an article by the association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) which asks the question, 'How Do We Know the Effects of the Genetic Technology behind COVID Vaccines?. The key points in the article are:
    • Is the messenger RNA rapidly broken down and excreted, as Dr. Paul Offit states in MedScape? According to the European Medicines Agency, “No traditional pharmacokinetic or biodistribution studies have been performed with the [Pfizer] vaccine candidate BNT162b2.” A few studies of surrogate mRNA or of the novel lipids that accompany it have been done in rats or mice.
    • Are the effects of the mRNA—which causes your cells to make spike protein—limited in quantity and restricted in distribution? The spike protein has been found circulating in the blood and accumulating in tissues, especially bone marrow and ovaries. It can even cross the blood-brain barrier.
    • Do spike proteins benignly attach to receptor sites and simply serve as “mug shots” for recognizing intruders, as Dr. Offit claims? Or do they by themselves cause damage and provoke inflammation and blood clotting, as others contend? Evidence could come from autopsies of patients who died post vaccination, or from placentas of mothers who miscarried. Where are the reports?
    • Does genetic material from the vaccines get integrated into your DNA? Re-engineering DNA is the stated purpose of much defense department-funded research, and adenovirus vectors (like those in the J&J product) are commonly employed. RNA can also be used. Dr. Offit states the COVID products lack what would be needed. However, Moderna’s chief medical officer, Tal Zaks, has described its vaccine as a “computer operating system.” What do Moderna’s internal documents reveal? Can we check to see whether tissues are making foreign products such as a light-emitting protein like luciferase? Can we sample random vials and sequence the RNA they contain?
  • no studies were performed in order to evaluate the transmission of vaccine components from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated, specifically transmission of the spike protein - both in vitro and animal studies were skipped - Karen call this "the most irresponsible, reckless thing i have ever seen in the history of medicine"
  • 164 million American have been injected with an mRNA "vaccine" which causes the body to create the highly infectious and potentially deadly spike protein
  • Doug Billings states "We're looking at 60,000 people dead from the jab so far and that number's climbing every day."
  • before the "pandemic" started the NIH changed the 'conformation' (the shape) of the spike protein so that it would bind to the ACE2 receptor of the body's major organs (heart, lungs, kidneys, etc.), thus making sure the spike protein would cause inflammation and death (12bytes says: And this is exactly what we're seeing from the CDC VAERS database where even vaccinated children are suffering from myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle), a condition which the CDC calls "mild" in spite of the fact that myocarditis is never mild according to doctors and that it can later manifest in different ways and cause early death.), furthermore, they never made sure that this change would prevent infection from SARS-CoV-2
  • Pfizer and Moderna are performing live dosing studies in order to determine how much "vaccine" materials people can withstand - this is supposed to be done before the "vaccines" are injected into humans (animal testing)
  • early on in the "pandemic" the Trump administration made sure that hydroxychloroquine was made available for early treatment through Emergency Use Authorization, however Fauci, the scientific community and the mainstream media conspired to have it removed from the EUA (12bytes says: A drug cannot be granted EUA status if an effective treatment already exists, thus why hydroxychloroquine, which is extremely safe and effective, as is ivermectin and high-dose vitamin C, had to be barred. Pharmacists refused to fill (and still do) a doctors prescription for hydroxychloroquine.)
  • in Pfizer's IND (Investigational New Drug application) they state that there is a risk for unvaccinated people to become infected (spike protein shedding) by being in close proximity to a vaccinated person - the document states that pregnant mothers should avoid contact with vaccinated people and that if they are exposed, they need to inform the safety board
  • DO NOT get this injection if you are a man or woman planning on having a child

The Truth About the Jab: The Jab causes the Delta Variant! - Karen Kingston | Doug Billings

27th July, 2021 - Here is part 6 of the 6 part series of Doug Billings interview with Karen Kingston. Karen Kingston provides proof that the Jab is causing the Delta variant.

Following are some of the slides Karen used in her interviews (click to enlarge):

Karen Kingston-Stew Peters interview, slide 1, 2021.07.28

Karen Kingston-Stew Peters interview, slide 2, 2021.07.28

Karen Kingston-Stew Peters interview, slide 3, 2021.07.28

COVID-19 - A Manufactured Illusion - Dr. David E. Martin with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

As you digest this, keep in mind that several people in the healthcare profession, including Dr. Thomas S. Cowan, state that there is not a single scientific study that proves that viruses exist, nor has any alleged virus been isolated according to Koch's postulates, or the modified Rivers' postulates, nor is there a single scientific study that proves that a 'virus' can be transmitted from human to human. If you want an excellent introduction to 'germ theory' verses 'terrain theory', which is the evidence backed theory that toxins, not viruses, cause disease, I highly suggest reading Dr. Cowan's book, The Contagion Myth - Why Viruses (including "Coronavirus") Are Not the Cause of Disease. Many more books which destroy 'germ theory' can be found at the Open Library. That said, i use the word 'virus' in the key points of the video.

Some of the key points brought forth by Dr. Martin:

  • Pfizer applied for a S-spike protein vaccine patent for the canine coronavirus on January 28, 2000 (patent no. 6372224).
  • There is nothing 'novel' about spike protein vaccines or coronaviruses, both of which are 22 years old.
  • "Dr." Anthony Fauci and NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) found coronavirus to be a potential candidate for HIV vaccines.
  • SARS is man-made (COVID-19, we are told, is the result of the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus which has never been properly isolated by any lab in the world).
  • In 1999, "Dr." Anthony Fauci funded research at the University of Carolina, Chapel Hill, to create an "infectious replication defective coronavirus" targeted to human lung epithelium.
  • SARS was patented on April 19, 2002 (patent no. 7279327) and the virus is able to be genetically modified.
  • In 2001, an enormous number of bacterial and viral pathogens were patented through NIH (National Institutes of Health), NIAID, USAMRIID (United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases) and other agencies.
  • SARS was being considered as a biological weapon candidate in or around 2001.
  • On April 25, 2003, the CDC (Centers for Disease Control) illegally patented the entire gene sequence (patent no. 7220852) for what was to become the SARS coronavirus (SARS CoV). Additional patents included the means to detect the virus using rtPCR (reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction).
  • On April 28, 2003, 3 days after the CDC filed a patent for the SARS-CoV gene sequence, Sequoia Pharmaceuticals filed a patent (no. 7151163) for the treatment of the virus. The Sequoia patent was written, but not yet filed, before the CDC patent was filed. This raises the question of how it is possible to have a treatment for a virus that was patented 3 days earlier. "This, my friends, is the definition of criminal conspiracy, racketeering and collusion." said Dr. Martin.
  • On June 5, 2008, around the time when DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) took an interest in coronavirus as a biological weapon, Ablynx, a Sanofi company, filed a series of patents (starting with patent no. 9193780), that specifically targeted several aspects of what we now know as the SARS-CoV-2 virus -- the alleged virus that we are told causes COVID-19 -- including the spike protein.
  • In all, 73 patents were filed by various entities between 2008 and 2019 that targeted the SARS-CoV virus.
  • A paper titled, SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human emergence, was written by Ralph S. Baric and published on March 15, 2016.
  • Dr. Martin states, "There wasn't a lab leak. [SARS-CoV-2] is an intentional bio-weaponization of spike proteins to inject into people to get them addicted to a pan-coronavirus vaccine."
  • In November, 2019, a month before the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, NIAID, University of North Carolina and Moderna began the sequencing of a spike protein vaccine.
  • In March, 2019, before the first outbreak of the SARS CoV-2 virus, Moderna knew that it would be placed in the front of the line to develop a COVID-19 vaccine which would utilize the lipid nano particle and spike protein. At the same time Moderna amended 4 rejected patent filings to specifically make reference to a deliberate release of coronavirus.
  • Dr. Martin tells us that in the book, A World At Risk by the WHO (World Health Organization), published in September, 2019, it is written that "A coordinated global experience of a respiratory pathogen release, which by September, 2020, must put in place a universal capacity for public relations management, crowd control and the acceptance of a universal vaccine mandate." I did not find anything like that in the book or anywhere else, however i don't know whether the book i linked to is a different revision.
  • Dr. Martin states that "[...] the evidence makes it abundantly clear that there has been no effort by any pharmaceutical company to combat the virus. This is about getting people injected with the known to be harmful S1 spike protein."
  • When "Dr." Anthony Fauci tried to patent mRNA technology during the time when he tried to develop an HIV vaccine, he was told by the patent office that his request did not meet the patentable standard, the clinical standard, or the legal standard for a vaccine.

Dr. Martin tells us that the manufactured COVID-19 pandemic is all about money and that the script for it was written by Moderna, one of the vaccine manufacturers. While this may very well be true, i find this to be a bit short-sighted given that the authors of the larger script, in my view, are the World Economic Forum in their radical plans they call 'the great reset' (aka 'build back better') and the equally radical United Nations plans for 'sustainable development', which have nothing to do with sustainability. Their plans for the entire world, which are technocratic and transhumanist in nature, are very much in our faces and ears for any who care to look and listen.

DR. DAVID MARTIN - Arming The Public With Important Information - Nov 2021

Dr Pierre Gilbert Warns In 1995 About Magnetic Vaccines (English Subtitles)

"In the biological destruction there are the organized tempests on the magnetic fields. What will follow is a contamination of the bloodstreams of mankind, creating intentional infections. This will be enforced via laws that will make vaccination mandatory. And these vaccines will make possible to control people. The vaccines will have liquid crystals that will become hosted in the brain cells, which will become micro-receivers of electromagnetic fields where waves of very low frequencies will be sent. And through these low frequency waves people will be unable to think, you'll be turned into a zombie. Don't think of this as a hypothesis. This has been done. Think of Rwanda."

The Emperor Has No Corona

An investigation into the "Isolation" of the SARS-COV2 "virus".

PCR Test Explained and Simplified

Once upon a time in Wuhan....

Stew Peters With Karen Kingston - Former Pfizer Employee Confirms Poison in COVID 'Kill Shot'

Ramola D With Dr. Jane Ruby - Do Not Let Kids Get COVID Tests, Vaxx, & Booster Jab-[June 18th 2021]

Dire Warning From DR Charles Hoffe About Covid-19 Jab Spike Protein And its Effects on the Body

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich interviews Whitney Webb - Corona committee

5 Doctors Agree that COVID-19 Injections are Bioweapons and Discuss What to do About It

Ever since reports have surfaced in recent days that people who have chosen NOT to receive the experimental COVID-19 shots but have been exposed to those who have received them, and have suffered what appear to be infections coming from these fully "vaccinated" people, affecting mainly women who have reported menstruation difficulties, heavy bleeding, miscarriages, and reduction of breast milk, I have been watching my newsfeed to see if any of the dissenting doctors and scientists we feature regularly here at Health Impact News would address these issues.

Fortunately, a team of 5 doctors in the U.S., all of whom we have featured in the past here at Health Impact News and are highly qualified to address this topic, just held a round-table discussion a couple of days ago to address these issues.

The issues they discuss affect ALL of us in the U.S. (and around the world) right now, and it is imperative that you take 79 minutes of your time to watch this video.

Not only do these highly qualified doctors discuss why they think this is happening, they also give practical advice at the end about what we can be doing right now to protect ourselves and stop this attack on the human race by the Globalists seeking to reduce the world's population.

Every single one of these doctors believe that these shots are NOT vaccines, but bioweapons designed to kill human beings.

Whatever else you are doing when you come across this video, it is highly unlikely that anything else you do the rest of your day will be more important than watching this video so you can be informed of the evil effects of these injections that are being censored in the corporate media and Big Tech social media.

Then share this video with as many people as you can.

Full Press Conference - Dr. Dan Erickson & Dr. Artin Massihi on Covid-19 (22-Apr-2020)

Two emergency room physicians with a combined 40 years of experience in microbiology, virology, immunology and related fields, use science and data to completely destroy the major talking points parroted by the mainstream (political) narrative regarding the COVID-19 virus "pandemic".

Alternate link: https://archive.org/embed/full-press-conference-dr-dan-erickson-dr-artin-massihi

"Human 2.0"? A Wake-Up Call To The World - Dr. Carrie Madej

Dr. Carrie Madej, DO, is a Internal Medicine Specialist in McDonough, GA and has over 19 years of experience in the medical field. She graduated from Kansas City Univ Of Medicine Bioscience College Of Osteopathic Medicine medical school in 2001.

In this video she voices her well founded concerns regarding the upcoming RNA vaccine for the SARS-CoV-2 virus and transhumanism.

Plandemic II: InDoctorNation by Mikki Willis

Guided by the meticulous work of Dr. David E. Martin, Plandemic II: Indoctornation, tracks a three decade-long money trail that leads directly to the key players behind the COVID 19 pandemic. David Martin is the creator of the world's first quantitative public equity index – the CNBC IQ100. He served as Chair of Economic Innovation for the UN-affiliated Intergovernmental Renewable Energy Organization and has served as an advisor to numerous Central Banks, global economic forums, the World Bank and International Finance Corporation, and national governments. Dr. Martin has pioneered global programs to bring corporate and stock market transparency to multi-national extractive industries and has been instrumental in bringing the world's largest white-collar criminals to justice.

DO NOT WEAR A MASK!!!! Kristen Meghan

America's Frontline Doctors Respond to High Tech Censorship

All of the mainstream social media platforms have deleted these videos. Copies can be found on BitChute. One of the reasons this critically important content is being censored is because doctors all over the world are promoting and using the extremely safe and effective drug, hydroxychloroquine to cure OCVID-19 patients, however the pharmaceutical companies cannot make any significant profit from it. There are deeper reasons also. For more information, see the Coronavirus (COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2) news and resources pages.

Legal resources

The restrictions that state governors, law/code enforcement officers and businesses are pushing under threat of force are illegal and unconstitutional, but there are people and organizations that are fighting this "new normal". These folks are here to help small business owners and individuals, so please take advantage of the services they offer.

Children's Health Defense

The Children’s Health Defense Legal Section has extensive legal resources that make aware and acquaints individuals about their legally protected rights to encourage, engage and empower individuals in a fight to preserve their fundamental human rights and on issues critical to health freedom.

America's Frontline Doctors

America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS), founded by doctor and lawyer Simone Gold, offers several legal resources including templates that can be used by anyone to fight back against employers or businesses that break the law by requiring medical interventions such as vaccines and masks.

The Secret Is NOT to Refuse The Jab - Sample Letter

From a lawyer:

If you are being forced to Vax in order to keep your job, here’s a great way to handle it. (Conditional acceptance) The secret is NOT to refuse it.

The letter follows:

“I write with regard to the matter of potential covid vaccine and my desire to be fully informed and appraised of ALL facts before going ahead. I’d be most grateful if you could please provide the following information, in accordance with statutory legal requirements.”:

1. Can you please advise the approved legal status of any vaccine and if it is experimental?

2. Can you please provide details and assurances that the vaccine has been fully, independently and rigorously tested against control groups and the subsequent outcomes of those tests?

3. Can you please advise the entire list of contents of the vaccine I am to receive and if any are toxic to the body?

4. Can you please fully advise of all the adverse reactions associated with this vaccine since it’s introduction?

5. Can you please confirm that the vaccine you are advocating is NOT experimental mRNA gene altering therapy?

6. Can you please confirm that I will not be under any duress from yourselves as my employers, in compliance with the Nuremberg Code?

7. Can you please advise me of the likely risk of fatality, should I be unfortunate to contract Covid 19 and the likelihood of recovery?

8. Can you please advise me if I were to experience any adverse reactions is the manufacturer of the vaccine liable? If the manufacturer isn’t liable will the company I’m currently employed with with be responsible & liable as it is their request that I have the vaccine in order to carry on my employment?

Once I have received the above information in full and I am satisfied that there is NO threat to my health, I will be happy to accept your offer to receive the treatment, but with certain conditions – namely that:

1. You confirm in writing that I will suffer no harm.

2. Following acceptance of this, the offer must be signed by a fully qualified doctor who will take full legal and financial responsibility for any injuries occurring to myself, and/or from any interactions by authorized personnel regarding these procedures.

3. In the event that I should have to decline the offer of vaccination, please confirm that it will not compromise my position and that I will not suffer prejudice and discrimination as a result?

I would also advise that my inalienable rights are reserved.

National Vaccine Information Center

The National Vaccine Information Center represents citizens from every state, who support the principle of informed consent to medical treatment, which has become a central ethical principle in the practice of modern medicine and is applied to medical interventions which involve the risk of injury or death.

For legal matters, click on their 'Law & Policy' link.

Stop Mandatory Vaccinations as a Condition of Employment! My Body, My Choice!

No one should ever be coerced into a medical procedure for any reason including a condition of employment. Tell them "My Body, My Choice!"

With one click, send a letter to your Federal officials, Governor, State legislators, Mayor and City Council Members

MY KIDS, MY CHOICE

Q: ARE YOU BEING TOLD YOU WILL BE FIRED FROM YOUR JOB IF YOU DON' T GET THE COVID-19 VACCINE?
ANSWER: YOU CAN FILE A RELIGIOUS OBJECTION IN ALL 50 STATES!!
Q: ARE YOU BEING TOLD YOU CANNOT ATTEND YOUR COLLEGE IF YOU DO NOT GET THE COVID-19 VACCINE?
ANSWER: 46/ 50 STATES OFFER A RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION TO COLLEGE!

How To Avoid Mandatory Covid Shots At Your University Or College

Numerous schools have announced that COVID-19 injections will be compulsory for student attendance. We would like to share some information on how you can potentially avoid the experimental shots by obtaining either a religious or medical exemption.

more...

Forms for Employees Whose Employers Are Requiring Covid-19 Injections

The forms can be found on the Solari website at https://pandemic.solari.com/.

The Constitutional Law Group
Genesee, PA
https://www.constitutionallawgroup.us/

Rick Martin of the Constitutional Law Group is a lawyer who is helping businesses. The website offers a lot of resources. This group is apparently *crushing* these criminal governors and dictators.

This is the first resource i would heatedly recommend for all small business.

New Mexico Stands Up!
New Mexico
https://www.nmstandsup.org/

New Mexico Stands Up! is a non-partisan, volunteer-driven organization working to protect individual rights through public interest legal action, provide additional support to New Mexicans facing loss of health freedom, and educate the public about the reality of the declared public health emergency and their rights with regard to mandated medical interventions. We are united in our desire to preserve our civil liberties, to expose the misrepresentations surrounding the declared public health emergency, and to hold our elected leaders and government agencies accountable for their actions.

The Healthy American
San Clemente, CA 92674
https://www.thehealthyamerican.org/

Peggy Hall is a passionate civil rights activist. Peggy helps individuals and small businesses with free and paid resources. See the 'Documents' and 'Videos' pages of her website, as well as her BitChute channel.

Form for Employees Whose Employers Are Requiring Covid-19 Injections

All over America, employees are facing a very tough decision right now. Although some wish to accept a Covid-19 injection, many do not. The problem is that a growing number of employers are trying to deny employees' right to choose and their right to bodily integrity by requiring the vaccines as a condition of employment. In the United States and other jurisdictions, that is a violation of the law. It is also a violation of fundamental human and religious rights.

DO FEDERAL EMPLOYEES HAVE TO GET THE NEEDLE? Peggy Hall

THE DOJ SAID EMPLOYERS CAN MANDATE? Peggy Hall

CAN A PRESIDENT MANDATE THAT YOU GET THE NEEDLE? – Peggy to the Rescue

CAN THE MILITARY MANDATE VACCINES? – Peggy to the Rescue

"IS A MANDATE THE SAME AS A LAW?" PEGGY TO THE RESCUE!

Articles

Exposed: Alex 'Bullhorn' Jones

Is Alex Jones the truth-seeking patriot he claims to be, or is there another force behind the bullhorn wielding darling of the alternative media?

Is Alex Jones really the truth seeking patriot he claims to be, or is there a hidden agenda driving the bullhorn wielding darling of the alternative media?

The CIA Background And Assets In Alex Jones Family? Look...

Alex Jones CIA connections (1 of 2)

Alex Jones CIA connections (2 of 2)

Similar to NPR, Alex Jones enjoys a prominent position in the alternative media scene. From Wikipedia:

The Alex Jones Show syndicated radio program is broadcast nationally by Genesis Communications Network to more than 70 AM and FM radio stations in the United States, and to WWCR Radio shortwave. Live-broadcast times are weekdays 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. CST and Sundays from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. CST. The Sunday broadcast is also broadcast by Emmis Communications' KLBJ Radio.

As of 2010, he was estimated to have an audience of over 2 million listeners, with a demographic heavier in younger viewers than other conservative pundits.[24] In 2011, he had a larger on-line audience than Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh combined.[41] Author Will Bunch says that Jones was in part a model for Glenn Beck who "synthesized" some of the paranoia of Jones's commentaries into his persona.[24]

Jones is also the operator of several web sites centered on news and information about civil liberties issues, global government, and a wide variety of current events topics. Several of these sites are www.infowars.com, www.prisonplanet.tv, www.prisonplanet.com, and www.jonesreport.com.

Having briefly been a fan of Alex Jones early in my investigation into the terrorist attacks upon the United States on September 11, 2001, i have since become disillusioned by his incessant fear-mongering, gross exaggerations and failed predictions. What has come to bother me most however is his constant referrals to Adolf Hitler, the Nazis and Germany's role in World War II, subjects of which he either knows virtually nothing about or which he is purposely falsifying, and i strongly suspect it is the latter. His remarks and catch phrases regarding Hitler and the holocaust can be heard in many of his broadcasts.

It seems decidedly odd to me that an investigative journalist, as he labels himself, could be so utterly ignorant of the facts regarding Germany's role in the Second World War. One of the several false claims that Jones likes to repeat is that the Nazis added fluoride to the public water supplies in order to dumb-down the masses. Another is that Hitler disarmed the German people in order to facilitate his rise to power. The fluoride claim appears to be factually incorrect and the disarming of the German populace is provably and grossly inaccurate.

It seems all but impossible that Jones could have failed to take notice of the wealth of information regarding Germany's role in the war and it therefore stands to reason that, if he is aware of the truth, then he must be purposely falsifying and distorting it. The question is, why?

There is obviously a criminal element of Jewry that has been at work for a very long time in the west, especially in the United States, and Alex Jones consistently goes out of his way to avoid the subject and deflect criticism from the Zionist mafia exactly as does the mainstream media. Extreme over-representation of Jews in virtually all of the important institutions in the United States and elsewhere, as well as Zionist philosophies, can be found throughout the government, media, education and finance sectors, yet Alex rarely speaks in-depth about the political influence exerted by these criminals. If he is the patriotic American he claims to be, then why does he largely omit a well established and crucial element of corruption from his programming, one which is key to understanding the problems we face today?

As it turns out, we need not question Jones' allegiance as he was kind enough to provide the answer for us in several videos and, as many have long suspected, that allegiance is to the racist state of Israel.

The Alex Jones Show, January 2, 2017. His rant starts at 1:15:00:

An earlier video of Alex Jones proudly touting his support for Zionist Israel:

More recently, Alex demonstrated his support of Israel in this clip:

I think that for many, including myself, listening to the content that Alex Jones broadcast was enlightening and empowering in ways, sort of like attending a 'Geopolitics 101' class. Thankfully many of us have long since graduated and now see Jones for what he really is; a liar and a bullshit artist whose propaganda is a stumbling block to anyone seeking the real truth.

Resources for further study:

Ultimate Jonestown woodshed | Ryan Dawson

https://ia801002.us.archive.org/0/items/UltimateJonestownWoodsheded/Ultimate%20Jonestown%20Woodsheded.mp4?cnt=0

Alex Jones Wants Your Money, Beware

Alex Jones CAUGHT LYING About Epstein Network

Jones used to tell his audience that it was Arabs running Hollywood, however it's now the "chi-coms", referring to the Chinese. His swapping of the Arabs for the Chinese is another indication that Jones is being handled by outside forces. Jones also tells us that the "chi-coms" are the key players the Jeffery Epstein network which of course is patently false.

Hysterical Alex Jones Weeps & Prays For Bibi: "Globalists Clearly Trying To Overthrow Israel" & Arrest Netanyahu. 'All You That Hate Jews' Get Ready for Islamic Rule in the U.S.

On his Monday January 2 show, Infowars Alex Jones went on an absolutely hysterical rant, weeping, praying for Bibi Netanyahu, saying that the 'globalists' want to destroy Israel, which will launch Armageddon, ...

Alex Jones, Robert Spencer, Paul Joseph Watson, and Pamella Geller Are All Zionist Whores

If you are an Alex Jones fan, be smart. Use your critical thinking skills. If you have been pouring money on his show business, think again. Psycho-analyze Jones thoroughly. He is certainly laughing all the way to the bank.

Jones wants your money, which is his "precious." And to get that money, he will always mix a little bit of truth in a river of fabrication, strong enough to distract you from focusing on the main issue.

Michael Collins Piper Debunks Alex Jones and Jordan Maxwell: Teutonic Zionism

Alex Jones answers the Zionist question

David Duke Exposes Alex Jones while exposing the global Zionist takeover

Infowars Callers Angry at Alex Jones for Zionist Propaganda

Alex Jones Y2K Broadcast, Dec.31 ,1999

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLtlBJWDA4I

Alex Jones Is ‘No Better Than ISIS’: How The Infowars Host Spreads Fear For Profit

Disseminating misinformation about Muslims is the controversial talk show host’s latest attempt at nurturing a climate of fear that earns big money for Jones and his advertisers.

Alex Jones Exposed by Milton William Cooper

Infowars Employees Expose Alex Jones

Alex Jones Crashes Austin Pro Gun Rally, Then Lies About It On His Show

26 Alex Jones LIES Debunked

42 STUPID Alex Jones PREDICTIONS

10 Reasons Why Radio Host Alex Jones Is The Most Dangerous Man In America

On February 12, 2012, news broke that Alex Jones was likely an intelligence tool of STRATFOR, a Zionist intelligence agency located in Austin, Texas. On February 15, 2012, just 3 days after the original article was published, Jones abruptly canceled his nationwide speaking tour which he had been promoting since February 2, 2012.

Jones stated that his sudden change in plans was due to the fact that "the collapse is so imminent". Obviously, Jones has been made as a traitorous spy and is running scared. Revelation of Jones' ties to Israeli intelligence should come as no surprise since Jones has not and will not reveal the true Zionist control of America.

Is Alex Jones A Zionist Shill?... Controversy Swirls

ABOUT SEVEN WEEKS AFTER EXPOSING JONES AS A LIAR AND A FRAUD on his highly-regarded national patriot radio show (Watch & Listen HERE), William Cooper (author of the alternative news best-seller - 'Behold A Pale Horse' - was shot to death at his home in Eager, Arizona on November 5, 2001.

Indeed, the renowned author, historian, and political theorist, Cooper exposed Jones clearly as a fraud and was, according to many, assassinated to shut him up a few weeks LATER.

Is Alex Jones Linked To Zionist-Jew Bronfman?

THE CONTROVERSY OF ALEX 'BULLHORN' JONES being an alleged Zionist shill has now expanded to his apparent Zionist-Jewish connections on his 1) Personal Staff 2) Website Advertisers 3) Link To Time Warner President, Edgar Bronfman Jr.

Jones' seeming allegiance to Zionism, which explains why he virtually never targets Zionist Jews or the racist, Zionist rogue state of Israel when engaging in his notorious rants and attacks, may well stem from a Protestant-Zionist belief system, and the widely circulated reports that his wife is a Jew - - which makes his two children Jewish under Talmudic law and eligible for the Israeli Law Of Return. In that Jones' wife is of Jewish heritage, both she and the children would be automatic dual citizens...Alex would not qualify.

Dr. Strangelove: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Alex Jones and Paul Joseph Watson

If people haven’t yet been convinced that [Jones] is an outright shill and operative for the Jewish money power in this world, then I am not sure what will… he is not a legitimate patriot fighting against the New World Order but a Zionist shill.

The Alex Jones Machine - Round Two

These pages will show...

  • Alex and Kelly Jones' documented connections to Bronfman, power lawyer Elizabeth Schurig...who just happens to be Alex Jones personal attorney.

  • Free Speech Systems and other Jones companies have the same elite zionist corporate address as does Bronfman attorney Schurig.

  • Jeff Rense was forced off GCN because he dared post a LINK on his news site to another site with a legitimate journalist's story questioning Jones' true motives and apparent zionist agenda.

  • Interesting examples of speech reversals taken from theJones own statement about Rense.

  • Ted Anderson's betrayal of the so-called 'GCN mission' by caving to Jones' demands.

  • Anderson supports Clear Channel by frequently buying ads for his Midas gold company on it. People send Midas Resources checks for silver and gold...Ted sends checks to Clear Channel.

Terror Attack That Alex Jones Blamed on Muslims, Revealed to Be Inspired by Frequent Guest on His Show

The driver of the van, Darren Osborne, is now on trial. Proceedings have indicated that Osborne was radicalized in a matter of weeks as he became obsessed with the commentary of Tommy Robinson, a former leader of the violent anti-Muslim hate group English Defence League, Rebel Media employee, and frequent guest of Alex Jones.

Alex Jones Before Selling Out : Johnny Gat