"To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize?" — Kevin Alfred Strom, All America Must Know the Terror That is Upon Us, Aug 14, 1993 (source)
You know, it pisses me off when a website that i consider to be generally trustworthy loses its marbles and posts fermented sewage that people are expected to swallow without question. Even worse is that the purpose of this said sewage is to promote a novel that envisions -- now get this -- Jews in Palestinian detention camps! It happens, i know, we all go stupid once in a while, but this? This was well beyond stupid. That this cliché riddled
"opinion piece" book advertisement appeared on one of my go-to websites struck me like a turd bumping against my bare leg in the cool waters of a pristine mountain lake. The piece in question is Are We One ‘Trigger Event’ Away From the Next Holocaust? by Harvey 'The Abstract' Schwartz (ok, but his middle name does begin with an 'A'). The website: WhoWhatWhy. It's sort of fitting that this article appeared on that website because who, what and why were the among the questions i had after reading that tripe.
What if you believe, as many folks now do, that with anti-Semitism on the rise, something akin to the Holocaust could happen in the United States?
Why does Schwartz imply there is only one holocaust worth remembering? Have all the other genocides that far outweigh the Jewish cost in lives slipped his selective memory? And as for his insinuation that many people believe that something like the Jewish holocaust could happen in the U.S., he twisted that out of a study within which that question was never asked nor implied.
The FBI recently reported a 17 percent increase in attacks against Jews in the past year.
Schwartz neglects to mention how the definition of "hate speech" has been inflated like the Hindenburg to include anything and everything that some Jewish people, and probably all Zionists, Jewish or otherwise, as well as everyone on the radical left find distasteful. Of course there's going to be more "hate crimes" against Jews when the definition of "anti-Semitism" includes anyone pointing out inconvenient facts such as the fact that Israel has been engaged in a multi-decade genocidal slaughter of Palestinians whose land the Zionists stole and continue to steal, such as the one known as Operation Cast Lead. Tell me Schwartz, how long would i have to assault you, your family and your land before you pushed back? How much of your land would you allow me to steal? How many of your homes, schools and hospitals would i have to bulldoze and bomb? How many of your children would i have to jerk out of their beds in the middle of the night, kidnap and torture before you decided that enough is enough?
In 2018, the Anti-Defamation League reports the increase in anti-Semitic incidents from 2016 to 2017 was the largest in a single year since the ADL began tracking in 1979.
The ADL is a racist organization whose primary agenda is to protect Jewry and Israel from anyone critical of Jewry and Israel using any means necessary, no matter how unethical or criminal they may be.
Could organized anti-Semitism become a new American reality?
If Schwartz means the kind of so-called "anti-Semitism" that's applied to those critical of Israel, then i damn well hope so, but i suspect his usage of "organized" anti-Semitism, which of course has the same ring as 'organized crime', is intended to paint all critics of Israeli policy and all the bonafide Jew-haters with one big fat brush as though being one auto-magically means you're both. Well here's some news for you Schwartz; i don't think it's right for Israel to be conducting genocide against the Palestinian Arabs, nor does the rest of the entire world apparently (with the exception of the U.S. and Canada, obviously), and i'm not a Jew-hater.
Jews have been hated by one nation or another almost as long as there have been Jews.
Yes, some have, but does Schwartz mention why? Of course not, because any discussion of that subject is going to lead to a plethora of dark places that both he and the rest of the organized Zionist mafia will do anything to avoid illuminating. 'Why is it that Jews have been kicked out of approximately 67 countries prior to Hitler and persecuted in other ways in as many more?' Isn't that a question we should consider? Are we to believe that half the people on the planet are genetically engineered Jew-haters, or is there possibly a more logical reason, perhaps one having something to do with some Jews behaving very badly?
"You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We are intruders. We are disturbers. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them. We have been at the bottom not merely of the latest great war but of nearly all your wars, not only of the Russian but of every other major revolution in your history. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. We are still doing it. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it." -- Marcus Eli Ravage, A Real Case Against the Jews, The Century Magazine, Jan. 1928, pp. 346-350 (source)
"But as the Jew assimilates, acquires your languages, cultivates a certain intimacy, penetrates into your life, begins to handle your instruments, you are aware that his nature, once confined safely to his own life, now threatens yours."-- Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, 1924, p. 144 (source)
In almost all of these nations, Jews were as fully integrated into their societies as American Jews are today.[...]
These German Jews, and probably the English, French, Spanish, and even Egyptian Jews, felt as safe, as assimilated, as much a part of their country’s fabric as American Jews do today.
While many Jews do assimilate, others obviously do not. And of those that do, how many infiltrate rather than integrate? If all Jews were as well integrated as Schwartz lies, then why were/are Jews subject to persecution, both real and fabricated? Shouldn't they just be kinda like the next door neighbor whose weed-whacker you borrow because your newly permitted kid backed the car over yours? In one breath Schwartz tells us that Jews were, and are, "fully integrated" while, in the very same article, he tells us how hated they are. How can both be true? Here's a clue from a couple of fellow Jews, Harvey:
Before Jews were expelled from Paris, they owned half of the city’s property. Spanish Jews were politically powerful, [...]
So from Schwartz's pinhole perspective, a tiny minority controlling a vast amount of wealth and political influence, is tantamount to "fully integrated"? Let's see what others say about the "fully integrated" nature of Jews in the United States:
"Israel controls the United States Senate." — Sen. William Fulbright, while a guest on the CBS television program Face The Nation, Apr. 15, 1973 (source)
"I have never been so upset by a poll in my life. Only 22% of Americans now believe "the movie and television industries are pretty much run by Jews," down from nearly 50% in 1964. The Anti-Defamation League, which released the poll results last month, sees in these numbers a victory against stereotyping. Actually, it just shows how dumb America has gotten. Jews totally run Hollywood." — Joel Stein in Who runs Hollywood? C’mon, the Los Angeles Times, Dec. 19, 2008 (source)
"Politics in America has become a Jewish profession, just like arts and the law," […] "We now are overrepresented in all these areas." — Ira Forman, executive director of the National Jewish Democratic Council, in the Forward article Dozens of Jewish Super-Delegates May Hold Key to Democratic Race by Jennifer Siegel, Mar. 20, 2008 (source)
"For 12 years I’ve been accused of being an ‘antisemite’ for stating the obvious – the question of whether the ‘Protocols of the Elders of Zion’ is an authentic document or a forgery is irrelevant. Jewish power in media, finance and politics is immense and devastatingly dangerous." — In These Very Moments, The Protocols Are Being Rewritten by Gilad Atzmon, Feb. 8, 2015 (source)
"Congress, the White House, Hollywood and Wall Street are owned by Zionists. No question, in my opinion." — Helen Thomas, former UPI Senior White House correspondent, Dec., 2010 (source)
"There may be some truth in that if the Arabs have some complaints about my policy towards Israel, they have to realize that the Jews in the U.S. control the entire information and propaganda machine, the large newspapers, the motion pictures, radio and television, and the big companies, and there is a force that we have to take into consideration." — Richard Milhous Nixon, 37th President of the United States, quoted by Leonard Dinnerstein in Antisemitism in America, Oxford University Press, New York, 1994, p. 232-233 (source)
"I’ve never seen a President — I don’t care who he is — stand up to them. It just boggles the mind. They always get what they want. The Israelis know what is going on all the time. I got to the point where I wasn’t writing anything down. If the American people understood what a grip these people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms. Our citizens certainly don’t have any idea what goes on." — Thomas H. Moorer, Admiral in the US Navy and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, from an interview with Mordecai Gur, 1973 (source)
"The Jews, I find are very, very selfish. They care not how many Estonians, Latvians, Finns, Poles, Yugoslavs or Greeks get murdered or mistreated as D[isplaced] P[ersons] as long as the Jews get special treatment. Yet when they have power, physical, financial or political neither Hitler nor Stalin has anything on them for cruelty or mistreatment to the under dog." — Harry S. Truman, 33rd President of the United States, July 21, 1947 diary entry, The Real Estate Board of New York, Inc. – Diary and Manual (source)
"There’s a major lobby in the United States. They are hard workers. They stay on top of every comment, the most powerful lobby in Washington. Israel has f—ed up United States foreign policy for years." — Oliver Stone, American film director, screenwriter and producer, during an interview with The Times newspaper, Jul. 25, 2010 (source)
"Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel. Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat. That is why gentiles were created." — Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, head of Shas Council of Torah Sages during a sermon delivered Oct. 2010 in Jerusalem (source)
Harvey continues with...
German Jews filled World War I trenches fighting for their homeland, even fighting against English Jews and French Jews. Yet by 1933 Jews were expelled from the German military, [...]
So the roughly 100,000 Jews that fought in Hitler's army... didn't fight in Hitler's army? Or is it that they weren't Jewish enough according to Schwartz's standard? By the way, i wonder if Schwartz is aware that the 'Jew hating' Hitler had several Jewish employees and friends, not to mention the approximately 100,000+ Jewish-Germans who served in his army?
[...] and the concentration camps at Dachau and Buchenwald were opened.
Please tell us that Schwartz is not implying that Jews were gassed at either of these camps. Surely he realizes that even mainstream historians have admitted this long ago, though this inconvenient fact didn't get in the way of hanging Germans as a result of the Nuremberg and Dachau political show trials. I do have to credit him for being smart enough to not repeat the 'six million' myth for the sixth millionth time. If anyone is curious as to why Schwartz didn't bother to pay his respects to the dead in what could be the sixth millionth article about the Jewish holocaust, my answer is this; i don't know, but i suspect that perhaps enough of us, even in the U.S. and Canada, are aware that there's something wrong with that number, like it's grossly exaggerated or something. Or maybe it's the fact that no creditable historian on planet earth, nor anyone that can add and subtract (mostly the latter) for that matter, considers it to be creditable. I think i've unintentionally lent some credibility to Schwartz. Shit.
From the Lachout Document, Memo Number 31/48, which was issued by Allied Military Police HQ in Vienna on 1 January, 1948:
ALLIED MILITARY POLICE HQ
The Allied Committee of Inquiry has to date proven that no poison gas was used to kill prisoners at the following camps: Bergen-Belsen, Buchenwald, Dachau, Flossenburg, Gross-Rosen, Mauthausen and satellite camps Natzweiller, Nevengame, Niederhagen (Wewelsburg), Ravensbruck, Sachsenhausen, Stutthof, Theresienstadt.
In all cases where gassings were alleged, it could be proven that torture had been used to extract confessions and witnesses have lied.
Any former inmate who, during their debriefing continues to allege that poisoning gas was used to murder people (in particular Jews), are to be reported to this office and if they insist further, they are to be charged with perjury.
Allied Military Police Vienna
witnessed by: Lieutenant Lachout MP.
Much more on the alleged homicidal gas chambers of Hitler's Germany can be found here.
How could it happen here? History does not flow smoothly like a river. Dramatic changes come quickly, set into motion by sudden, unanticipated events. Historians refer to these as trigger events. The World Trade Center destruction of September 11, 2001, was a trigger event. Since those two airplanes brought the towers down, America, and much of the world, has dreaded the next terrorist shoe dropping. And the next.
Schwartz's 'opinion' piece was a trigger event for me, possibly even more so than the 'Five Dancing Israelis' who just happened to be ready with cameras before the first plane strike on that horrific day. You remember Harvey, the Mossad agents that were flicking Bic lighters and high-fiving each other? The ones that the FBI interrogated and then left flee back to Israel? Those ones. Who forewarned them of the impending doom? And more importantly, why didn't they warn the roughly 3000 people of their fate instead of congregating on a rooftop to film their imminent destruction? Do you use Odigo Harvey? Maybe you could fill in some of blanks for us.
You know Harvey, i think that if the psychopaths running Israel would just quit sticking their noses in everyone's business and terrorizing the rest of the world on their way to whatever kind of warped version of a utopia they envision for the 'chosen ones', perhaps the rest of us might find better things to do than pick on psychopathic elitist criminals. That thought ever cross your mind? Probably not, but i'll tell ya what my friend, it crosses the minds of a lot of other people and that number seems to be growing rapidly.
The American president declaring himself a nationalist was a dog whistle to white supremacists throughout the country.
Seriously? What about the Jewish supremacists in the Jewish state of Israel? How supremacist is it to have your very own country where non-Jews are regularly attacked and kicked out while the leadership of that same shit-hole advocates for multiculturalism everywhere except Israel?
Trump’s declaration on October 22, 2018 that "You know what I am? I’m a nationalist. OK? I’m a nationalist" was a trigger event. Nationalism is a word packed with historic meaning. The "na" in Nazi stands for "national" in Hitler’s party’s name.
So Schwartz points out that the 'na' in 'Nazi', a term which the Germans avoided, stands for 'national' in the National Socialist German Workers Party. His powers of logic are stunning indeed. I wonder why Zionists won't call the party by its correct name? I guess 'NSDAP' doesn't ring quite sinister enough. That asinine analogy aside, when the hell did nationalism become a dirty word? Yitzhak Laor, who wrote a piece for Haaretz titled 'The Tragedy of Jewish Nationalism' doesn't seem to think its a dirty word, at least not when it's used by Zionists:
"A country, any country, is a machine that needs citizens who believe in it, as if it is a home, as if their collective is a family. This is quite simple when the state, any state, is founded, for the collective has fought for its liberty, sacrificed lives, its own flesh and blood for it, and before the nation goes and rests under its vine or fig tree, the state again makes sure it will not forget its unity, will not forget it is a collective with a shared past, even if it doesn’t have any shared past or any common goals, even if some will die of thirst while others will live without thirst."
Oh and, by the way, i don't think Trump is a nationalist Harvey. If he were anything other then the same breed of weak-kneed Zionist whores that have infected Washington for roughly as long i've been alive, i don't think he'd see fit to pander to Israel, not that he has any real choice of course.
Nationalism led to the first and second world wars, to the Holocaust.
You got that right Harvey, but whose sense of nationalism was throwing the switches behind the curtain during both world wars?
"Whilst large sections of the German nation are struggling for the preservation of their race, we Jews fill Germany with our vociferations. We supply the press with articles on the subject of its Christmas and Easter. We ridicule the highest ideals of the German nation and profane the matters which it holds sacred." — Dr. Manfred Reifer, well known leader of the German Jews, in Czernowitzer Allgemeine Zeitung magazine, Sep. 1933, as quoted in Witness to History by Michael Walsh (source)
"Hitler will have no war (does not want war), but we will force it on him, not this year, but soon." — Emil Ludwig Cohn in Les Annales, June, 1934, as quoted in a 1943 edition of Das Stürmer (source)
"When they asked me, couldn’t you give money out of the United Jewish Appeal funds for the rescue of Jews in Europe, I said, ‘NO!’ and I say again ‘NO!’ … one should resist this wave which pushes the Zionist activities to secondary importance." — Yitzhak Greenbaum, Chairman of the Rescue Committee of the Jewish Agency, addressing the Zionist Executive Council in Tel Aviv, Feb. 18, 1943 (source)
"The war now proposed is for the purpose of establishing Jewish hegemony throughout the world." — Brigadier General George Van Horn Mosely in The Wisconsin Jewish Chronicle, Apr. 7, 1939 (source)
Besides the "Jews should have fought back" meme, the worldwide Jewish financier cabal meme is back, and again, it is back at the highest level.
And is that"meme", as you call it, inaccurate? Anyway, i wasn't aware that many people had awakened. I was beginning to lose hope.
"But I believe that Israel has a powerful stranglehold on the American government. They control both members of the House, the House and the Senate. They have us involved in wars in which we have little or no interest. Our children are coming back in body bags. Our nation is bankrupt over these wars. And if you open your mouth, you get targeted. And if they don’t beat you at the poll, they’ll put you in prison. […] They’re controlling much of our foreign policy. They’re influencing much of our domestic policy. Wolfowitz as undersecretary of defense manipulated President Bush number two back into Iraq. They’ve pushed definitely, definitely to try to get Bush before he left to move into Iran. We’re conducting the expansionist policy of Israel and everybody’s afraid to say it. They control much of the media, they control much of the commerce of the country, and they control powerfully both bodies of the Congress. They own the Congress." — James Traficant, former U.S. congressman, during an interview by Fox News, Sep. 10, 2009 (source)
"What I oppose most is the international Jewish money power that is met in every war. That is what I oppose–a power that has no country and that can order the young men of all countries out to death." — Henry Ford, The People’s Tycoon: Henry Ford and the American Century by Steven Watts, 2006, p. 383 (source)
America closing her doors to immigrants and refugees may soon build into the first fateful trigger event. One of Trump’s first official acts was to ban asylum seekers coming from some predominantly Muslim nations. In recent days, he extended that ban to asylum seekers on the southern border, effectively banning Hispanics.
How many Hispanic, black and Muslim asylum seekers, immigrants and refugees reside within Israel Harvey? Where was it that Palestinians used to live? Hint: it has six letters and it begins with I-S-R-A-E-L, and it used to be called Palestine (and still is as far as i'm concerned).
What would happen, I thought, if the next invasion of the unwanted America faced was from white refugees, white Jewish refugees.
I don't know Harvey, but if i were you the word 'karma' might cross my mind on those rare occasions when, for some incomprehensible reason, a flicker of human compassion temporarily displaces my indoctrinated sense of superiority and self worth, like an annoying housefly that needs to be crushed.
The scenario in the novel is that an atomic bomb has destroyed Tel Aviv and Arab armies have overrun Israel. A million Israelis are in Palestinian detention camps.
A novel is the only place where such a warped fantasy could ever materialize. This is a classic example of a racist Zionist attempting to take all the bloodshed and misery that has been inflicted upon the world by international Jewry (not that they're the only ones) and the Zionist ideology and turn it topsy-turvy to make the aggressor appear as the victim.
"Jewish huckstering is most obviously apparent in its frenzied compulsion to uphold the "holocaust" myth, whose exposure would not only refute the Jews’ claim to Palestine and to endless financial reparations and atonement for harm not done to them, it would also deliver Jews and their minions to the fury of a world deceived and victimized for centuries by their lies and conspiracies." — Gerard Menuhin in Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil by Gerard Menuhin, Oct. 2015, p. 456 (source)
And what then would American Jews do if their government treated desperate Jews with as little compassion as ...
As the Israelis treat the Palestinians?
I acknowledge that all of this sounds looney tunes, something from Hollywood, from Grade B Hollywood.
Sounds like a promotion for a really stupid novel to me.
Still, you say, nothing like the Holocaust could happen in America.
Wouldn't the first one have to have happened as it is generally described before there could be another?
"This conspiracy of democratic Jews and Free Masons dragged Europe into war two years ago. Arms had to decide. … Since then a struggle has been taking place between truth and lies and, as always, this war will end in the victory for truth. In other words, whatever lies British propaganda, international world Jewry and its democratic accomplices may concoct they will not change historical facts. And it is a historical fact that for two years now Germany has been defeating one opponent after another. … I did not want it. Immediately after the first conflict I again held out my hand. I have been a soldier myself and I know how difficult it is to win a victory. … My hand was rejected. And since then we have seen that each peace offer was immediately exploited by the warmonger Churchill and his confreres so that they could say it was proof of our weakness." — Adolf Hitler in a radio broadcast from Berlin to the German people, 1941