As with all of the articles in this series, the evidence presented here is a tiny fraction of that which is available. Please do your own research.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
BRUESEWITZ et al. v . WYETH LLC, fka WYETH, INC., et al.The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA or Act) created a no-fault compensation program to stabilize a vaccine market adversely affected by an increase in vaccine-related tort litigation and to facilitate compensation to claimants who found pursuing legitimate vaccine-inflicted injuries too costly and difficult.
[...]
As a quid pro quo, manufacturers enjoy significant tort-liability protections. Most importantly, the Act eliminates manufacturer liability for a vaccine’s unavoidable, adverse side effects.
Source: Cornell Law School
the risks
As the number of vaccines on the CDC schedule continues to skyrocket, so too has the rate of many diseases and other health problems. Vaccines are known or suspected of causing serious health issues, sometimes leading to death, and while some of the risks are well documented, others are not, due in part to corruption and a lack of funding for studies which challenge the safety and efficacy of vaccines, as well as an almost complete lack of vaccinated verses unvaccinated studies.
Some of the risks associated with vaccines include allergies, asthma, attention deficit disorder/attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADD/ADHD), autism, bronchitis, cancers, cardiovascular issues, clostridium difficile, death and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), dystonia, encephalitis, epilepsy, immune system damage, influenza, meningitis, miscarriages, myalgias, neurological disorders, pneumonia, rashes, respiratory infections, seizures, sensory processing disorder, multiple sclerosis, sterilization and tics.
Chronic Illness in Children—Who Is Sounding the Alarm? • Children's Health Defense
Children in the United States are experiencing a serious and historically unprecedented burden of chronic illness. American children display consistently poorer health outcomes than children in other wealthy nations, notwithstanding substantially higher per capita health care spending on U.S. children.
In a 2004 report, the National Research Council and Institute of Medicine called attention to the rising tide of ill health in American children and its long-term implications, warning that "the nation cannot thrive if it has large numbers of unhealthy adults." Ten years later, in Lancet Neurology, pediatric experts lamented the pandemic of neurodevelopmental toxicity in children that is "silently eroding intelligence, disrupting behaviors, truncating future achievements and damaging societies." Despite these and many other admonitions, U.S. agencies and officials have paid no meaningful attention to the crisis.
The Real Reasons Autism Rates Are Up in the U.S. - Scientific American
The latest estimate of autism prevalence-1 in 68-is up 30 percent from the 1 in 88 rate reported in 2008, and more than double the 1 in 150 rate in 2000. In fact, the trend has been steeply upward since the early 1990s, not only in the U.S. but globally, says Maureen Durkin, who heads the network site in Wisconsin.
Looking Back, Looking Forward: Cancer and Vaccines • Children's Health Defense
- Cancer is the leading disease-related cause of death in American children, and the rise in childhood cancers has occurred alongside dramatic expansion of the childhood vaccine schedule.
- Vaccine history illustrates that the presence of adventitious agents and contaminants in viral vaccines has been a recurrent problem, including monkey virus in polio vaccines and pig viruses in rotavirus vaccines-these unwanted and unanticipated contaminants may be linked to cancer risks.
- Vaccine manufacturers are interested in using continuous cell lines (which can reproduce indefinitely) for viral vaccines, including cell lines from human tumors and cell lines that cause tumors in lab animals.
- Although the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) did not previously allow tumor-derived or tumor-causing cell lines to be used in vaccines-due to concerns about their potential for transmitting diseases, including cancer-the FDA now says that these cell lines are "optimal" for growing some viruses.
A team of researchers from the Yale School of Medicine and Penn State College of Medicine have found a disturbing association between the timing of vaccines and the onset of certain brain disorders in a subset of children.
Analyzing five years' worth of private health insurance data on children ages 6-15, these scientists found that young people vaccinated in the previous three to 12 months were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with certain neuropsychiatric disorders than their non-vaccinated counterparts.
The Peanut Allergy Epidemic: What's Causing It and How to Stop It • Children's Health Defense
There are two lines of thought in the medical literature regarding injection as a mechanism of sensitization. The first is that injection, in the form of vaccination or other injections such as the neonatal vitamin K1 prophylaxis, merely unmasks genetic predispositions or tendencies to allergic disease. In short, there is something wrong with the child and not the injection(s).
The second line of thought is that there is a causal relationship between the injected ingredients and allergy-and although the proven allergenicity of vaccines is widely acknowledged, medical literature carefully avoids the question of what kinds of allergies vaccines can and do create to substances that are coincidentally or subsequently inhaled, ingested or injected. One exception to this unwritten rule was an unusual admission by Japanese doctors that an outbreak of gelatin allergy in children starting in 1988 and continuing through the 1990s was caused by pediatric vaccination.
ADD/ADHD • Children's Health Defense
Diagnoses of ADHD are on the rise. A population-based study published in 2015, which meticulously gathered reports from both teachers and parents, suggested that ADHD might affect up to 16% of elementary-school children (roughly one in six) which is three times higher than the estimated ADHD prevalence (5%) cited in the DSM-5. According to the CDC, ADHD diagnoses rose by 42% in less than a decade (2003-2011) for children and adolescents ages 4-17, translating into an average annual increase of 5%. Almost two-thirds (64%) of children and teens diagnosed with ADHD "had at least one other mental, emotional or behavioral disorder," including behavior or conduct problems, anxiety, depression, ASD and/or Tourette syndrome.
A federally funded study released Tuesday reported a "positive association" between "vaccine-related aluminum exposure" and "persistent asthma" in children 24-59 months old, but the study's authors were careful to not suggest a causal relationship.
Long before the arrival of experimental COVID injections - which, let's not forget, pharma executives refer to not as "vaccines" but as "cell and gene therapy" - the package inserts of licensed vaccines told the public a disturbing story.
The documentation of 400 different types of adverse reactions affecting virtually all organs and body systems, available to anyone willing to click on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's links, offered "hidden-in-plain-sight" clues of countless ways in which vaccination's aggressive immune-system intervention can cause fine-tuned immune responses to go awry.
Those package inserts, as damning as they still are, have just been eclipsed by shocking in-house Pfizer data forced into view by a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.
The company's confidential inventorying of reactions, which was "never supposed to see the light of day," shows that in the first 90 days of the injection's emergency use (through Feb. 28, 2021), Pfizer recorded more than 158,000 different adverse events - including 1223 deaths - distributed across 42,086 case reports,
While blood clots and heart problems following COVID vaccination have probably attracted the most widespread attention, Pfizer's adverse event chart displaying 27 different "system organ classes" reveals wide-ranging problems - many of which highlight a disturbing "reprogramming" of recipients' immune responses.
The Plausible Connection between Vaccines and SIDS • Children's Health Defense
In January 2018, media outlets reported the embarrassing news that children born in the United States are 76% more likely to die before their first birthday than infants born in 19 other wealthy countries. This clear-cut finding emerged from a cross-national study published in Health Affairs by medical researchers at Johns Hopkins and two other leading U.S. teaching hospitals. Even though the U.S. spends more on children's health care per capita than the other nations, the authors' unadorned conclusion was that the U.S. is "the most dangerous of wealthy nations for a child to be born into."
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and Escalating Mortality • Children's Health Defense
Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is the leading cause of post-neonatal infant mortality in the U.S. By definition, SIDS describes death that occurs in a "seemingly normal, healthy infant under one year of age" that is both unexpected and unexplainable-although there is mounting evidence that SIDS may be "medically induced" through vaccination.
Concomitant with this drop in infant vaccination is an overall drop in reports of infant vaccine adverse events on the CDC's Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS is a "passive surveillance" system used by the CDC to monitor any potential vaccine injury from shots administered in the U.S.
Where the number of reports of adverse events (AEs) for infants 2 and under was consistently above 4,000 for 2016 to 2019, in 2020, it dropped to just 2,303 - approximately half the number seen in previous years.
Interestingly, there has been a precipitous drop in Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) reports as well, as seen in the figure below. Where the rate of reporting of SIDS between 2014 and 2019 is approximately 20, in 2020, it drops by 75% to just 5 reports.
This is by far the lowest yearly number recorded in the history of VAERS, where the second-lowest was 13 incidents recorded in both 2008 and 2009.
the vaccines
covid 19 vaccine
The Unseen Crisis: Vaccine Stories You Were Never Told (A COVID-19 Documentary) (2023)
Some who took vaccine with the noblest of intentions experienced unexpected debilitating aftereffects. Instead of compassion, they were met with skepticism; instead of being helped they were shunned; instead of being heard, they were silenced. Join us as we bring their stories out of the shadows so they can be heard and seen and no longer alone.
Data released today by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) included 463,457 reports of injuries and deaths, across all age groups, following COVID vaccines - an increase of more than 25,000 compared with the previous week.
The data comes directly from reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.
The CDC did another data dump into their Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database today. As of August 27, 2021 there have been 13,911 deaths, 2,933,377 injury symptoms, 18,098 permanent disabilities, 76,160 ER visits, 56,912 hospitalizations, and 14,327 life threatening events recorded following experimental COVID-19 "vaccinations."
There have now been more than twice as many deaths recorded following COVID-19 shots during the past 9 months since the COVID-19 shots were given emergency use authorization, than deaths recorded following ALL vaccines for the past 30 years.
On Friday an FDA advisory panel declined to endorse authorization the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid booster shot for people aged 16 or older.
The panel voted 16-2 to reject extra doses of an experimental vaccine, citing insufficient data from incomplete clinical trials and the potential risk of heart inflammation - especially among young men.
The FDA hearing prior to the decision was stunning. The hearing was 8 hours long and it included SHOCKING testimony from American doctors.
Dr. Joseph Fraiman, MD told the FDA on Friday that government does not have data to show the vaccine was more beneficial than it is harmful for teenage boys.
Dr. Fraiman told the FDA panel he has NOT seen that those who show vaccine hesitancy are uninformed. "That is not what I've seen… The vaccine hesitant I've met in the ER are more aware of the vaccine studies and more aware of their own COVID risks than the doctors do. For example, many of my nurses refuse the COVID vaccine despite seeing more COVID deaths and devastation than most people have."
Dr. Fraiman went on to say he cannot assure a nurse associate who is 30 that the vaccines are safer than catching the virus is for a healthy woman her age.
Steve Kirsch, the Executive Director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund was up next to testify before the FDA. Kirsch argued the vaccines kill more people than they save.
Kirsh pointed out that there patients were 71 times more likely to suffer a heart attack after taking the vaccine than those taking other vaccines. 20 died from the drug, 14 from the placebo.
Kirsh argued that the vaccine killed more people than saved lives.
Covid Vaccine Scientific Proof Lethal – SUN
Just over 12 months from deployment of the COVID 19 emergency use experimental vaccines, scientific studies in the thousands, and reports of criminal complaints of assault and murder from the illegal, unlawful use of biochemical poisons made to police forces around the country, verify an assault on an unsuspecting UK population. Irrefutable science shows that the COVID 19 vaccine is not safe and not effective in limiting transmission or infection from the SARS-CoV-2, coronavirus pathogens.
The "safe and effective" false propaganda, put out by public officials who now are continuing to push this vaccine, is a clear breach of duty. A public office holder is subject to, and aware of, a duty to prevent death or serious injury that arises only by virtue of the functions of the public office.
Many have breached that duty and, in doing so, are recklessly causing a risk of death or serious injury, by carrying on regardless of the now-confirmed dangers associated with COVID 19 injections. Some of these risks are blood clotting, myocarditis, pericarditis, thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, anaphylaxis, Bell's palsy, Guillain-Barre, cancer including deaths, etc.
All of these are confirmed in the following science-and-government-gathered data from the UK Health and Security agency on COVID 19 regarding vaccine damage.
Because we have been told time and time again that the Covid-19 vaccines are our only route back to normal and we must come forward, roll up our sleeves and get the jab when called upon to do so. So the vaccines must surely do what they say on the tin?
That must be why they are so desperate to give an experimental injection to children, even though they are already at negligible risk of suffering serious disease. Perhaps the latest Public Health England data shows that risk would be reduced to zero?
Unfortunately, it looks as if we have been lied to and instead of the Covid-19 vaccines being our route back to normal they are instead quite the opposite. Because the data published by Public Health England shows us that the number of alleged deaths due to the Delta variant are not just higher among those who have received two doses of the Covid-19 vaccine, they are astronomically higher.
Aaron was 86 years old and joins a growing list of seniors above the age of 80 who have died shortly after receiving one of the mRNA experimental COVID injections.
Earlier this month we reported that 23 seniors in Norway, all above the age of 80, died shortly after being injected with the experimental COVID injections.
The Pharma-controlled corporate media, while announcing Hank Aaron’s death today, are predictably not mentioning the fact that he was recently injected with the Moderna COVID shot.
EU Admits 'CLEAR' link between AstraZeneca jab & blood clots | Principia Scientific Intl.
One of the European drug regulator's senior officials today claimed there is now a 'clear' link between AstraZeneca's Covid vaccine and potentially deadly blood clots.
The Moderna and Pfizer vaccine tests were conducted, as customary, with a control group; a group within the trial who were given a placebo and not the test vaccine. However, during the trial -and after the untested vaccines were given emergency use authorization- the vaccine companies conducting the trial decided to break protocol and notify the control group they were not vaccinated. Almost all the control group were then given the vaccine.
Purposefully dissolving the placebo group violates the scientific purpose to test whether the vaccine has any efficacy; any actual benefit and/or safety issues. Without a control group there is nothing to compare the vaccinated group against. According to NPR, the doctors lost the control group in the Johnson County Clinicial Trial (Lexena, Kansas) on purpose:
The Covid vaccines have numerous toxic ingredients in them. Perhaps, that is why the FDA knew in October, 2020, that there are more than 22 different serious diseases that could result from Covid vaccines including encephalitis, convulsions / seizures, stroke, and acute myocardial infarction.
New "cases" of the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) are said to be spiking in the nation of Gibraltar, despite a 99 percent "vaccine" compliance rate.
According to reports, the number of new Chinese Virus cases in Gibraltar has increased by over 2,500 percent since June 1, which is when the country achieved a 99 percent vaccination rate.
Prior to the Gibraltar government mass vaccinating its people for Chinese Germs, the case rate was low and things were normal (see the following graph). After everyone rolled up their sleeves and got injected, however, sickness and death are skyrocketing.
An update reports that the CDC has removed the VAERS report (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) report #1074247. Because reports are sequentially numbered it can be determined that a report is missing.
SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome - PubMed
This publications presents evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines modify human DNA and that this modification may be responsible for positive test results when testing for the virus.
Here we investigated the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome and that transcription of the integrated sequences might account for PCR-positive tests.
Dr Andrew Wakefield: This Is Not A Vaccine It Is An Irreversible Genetic Modification
"Do NOT Allow Them to Inject Your Children", BioTech Analyst Issues Chilling Warning
Doctor Dies from COVID Vaccine Reaction - Health Freedom Idaho
"The love of my life, my husband Gregory Michael MD an Obstetrician that had his office in Mount Sinai Medical Center in Miami Beach Died the day before yesterday due to a strong reaction to the COVID vaccine. He was a very healthy 56-year-old, loved by everyone in the community delivered hundreds of healthy babies, and worked tirelessly through the pandemic.
He was vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine at MSMC on December 18, 3 days later he saw a strong set of petechiae on his feet and hands which made him seek attention at the emergency room at MSMC. The CBC that was done at his arrival showed his platelet count to be 0 (A normal platelet count ranges from 150,000 to 450,000 platelets per microliter of blood.) he was admitted in the ICU with a diagnosis of acute ITP caused by a reaction to the COVID vaccine.
Karla Cecilia Perez was left partially paralyzed in her arms and legs mere hours after receiving the Pfizer/BioNTech jab on December 30 and was immediately placed in the intensive care unit of the hospital in Coahuila, in Nuevo Leon state. She also presented difficulties with speaking, according to media reports.
She experienced a number of seizures in addition to skin rash, weakness, and breathing difficulties all within half an hour of receiving the vaccine. She has since been preliminarily diagnosed with encephalomyelitis (inflammation of the brain and spinal cord).
measles mumps and rubella vaccine (MMR)
The Vaccinated Spreading Measles: WHO, Merck, CDC Documents Confirm
20 years ago, the MMR vaccine was found to infect virtually all of its recipients with measles. The manufacturer Merck's own product warning links MMR to a potentially fatal form of brain inflammation caused by measles. Why is this evidence not being reported?
In the article we find some very disturbing information regarding the mumps, measles and rubella (MMR) vaccine:
The phenomenon of measles infection spread by MMR (live measles-mumps-rubella vaccine) has been known for decades. In fact, twenty years ago, scientists working at the CDC's National Center for Infectious Diseases, funded by the WHO and the National Vaccine Program, discovered something truly disturbing about the MMR vaccine: it leads to detectable measles infection in the vast majority of those who receive it.
The article references a 1995 study published in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology titled Detection of measles virus RNA in urine specimens from vaccine recipients. In that paper we find the following:
Analysis of urine specimens by using reverse transcriptase-PCR was evaluated as a rapid assay to identify individuals infected with measles virus. For the study, daily urine samples were obtained from either 15-month-old children or young adults following measles immunization. Overall, measles virus RNA was detected in 10 of 12 children during the 2-week sampling period. In some cases, measles virus RNA was detected as early as 1 day or as late as 14 days after vaccination. Measles virus RNA was also detected in the urine samples from all four of the young adults between 1 and 13 days after vaccination.
$101 million dollar vaccine injury award for encephalopathy from MMR Vaccine
O.R.* was a one-year-old healthy baby girl who was already walking and climbing. On February 13, 2013, she received vaccinations for Measles Mumps Rubella (MMR), Hepatitis A, Haemophilus Influenzae type B (Hib), Prevnar (pneumonia), and Varicella (chickenpox). That evening, the mother noticed baby O.R. was irritable and feverish. After a call to the pediatrician, the doctor advised Mom to give her Tylenol and Benadryl. The fever continued for several days and on the evening before the baby’s scheduled pediatrician visit, O.R. began having severe seizures. She was rushed to the emergency room. Baby O.R. went into cardiac and respiratory arrest and doctors placed her on a ventilator. The seizures and cardiac arrest left O.R. with a severe brain injury, encephalopathy, cortical vision impairment, truncal hypotonia (low muscle tone), and kidney failure. After months of treatment at the hospital, baby O.R. finally went home, but her disabilities require specialized medical care and supervision around the clock for the rest of her life.
smallpox vaccine
The first vaccine ever developed was the smallpox vaccine. Known today as the father of immunology, British physician Edward Jenner, FRS (1749-1823), is credited with inventing the vaccine in 1796, though his contribution is disputed. According to Wikipedia it wouldn't be until the 1970s that smallpox was eradicated, 174 years after the vaccine was introduced. If you're wondering why it took that long to eradicate the disease, it appears that part of the answer is that the vaccine was somewhere between largely and completely ineffective and, in some cases, potentially deadly, yet vaccination was made compulsory in Britain in the 1800s for children whose parents could be fined and/or imprisoned for violations. In The Smallpox Vaccine Was No Silver Bullet, we read:
Allinson's [B. P. Allinson, MD] concerns about Jenner’s theory of vaccination may have been influenced by the smallpox mortality statistics in England during the mid 19th century, which skyrocketed after the introduction of smallpox vaccine. According to Dr. William Farr, Compiler of Statistics of the Registrar-General in London:
"Smallpox attained its maximum mortality after vaccination was introduced. The mean annual mortality to 10,000 population from 1850 to 1869 was at the rate of 2.04, whereas in 1871 the death rate was 10.24 and in 1872 the death rate was 8.33, and this after the most laudable efforts to extend vaccination by legislative enactments."
Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD noted that from 1859 to 1922, "official deaths related to [smallpox] vaccination were more than 1,600 in England and that from 1906 to 1922 the recorded deaths "from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same. In the United States, the last death from smallpox occurred in 1948. Since then, there have been between 200 and 300 deaths in the U.S. attributed to the smallpox vaccine.
There is an abundance of historical data that shows the smallpox vaccine was not the "silver bullet" that many believe was solely responsible for saving the world from the scourge of smallpox. To the contrary, the vaccine may have done more harm than good. There were many smallpox epidemics in Europe during the second half of the 19th century in which the vast portion of those who died from the disease had been vaccinated. By 1901, more people in the United Kingdom had died from the smallpox vaccine than from the disease itself.
Perhaps the most famous example of a case in which a large community was highly vaccinated against smallpox due to mandatory vaccination laws but still suffered a severe outbreak of the disease was the city of Leicester, England in 1872. Bystrianyk and Dr. Humphries write that after that outbreak the people of Leicester, “voted out of power their town government, and replaced it with one which created a smallpox safety system: laws were passed which made vaccination voluntary, established a rapid notification and quarantine system, including specially trained personnel and comfortable quarantine facilities for anyone exposed to the index (initial) case.
In a paper titled Risks of serious complications and death from smallpox vaccination: A systematic review of the United States experience, 1963–1968, published on the National Center for Biotechnology Information website in 2003, we find some disturbing information regarding the smallpox vaccine:
The United States (US) has re-instituted smallpox vaccinations to prepare for an intentional release of the smallpox virus into the civilian population.
[...]
However, the implementation the smallpox vaccination program is not without controversy [9]. Vaccinating individuals against smallpox infection, even voluntarily, means exposing vaccinees and their contacts to the risks of serious adverse reactions without the clear benefit of protection against an infection which does not exist and may never exist again.
If the eradication of smallpox wasn't largely the result of the vaccine, then what other factors might have played a role? My research indicates that two significant factors which contributed to its demise were the major advances in sanitation and nutrition as a result of the industrial revolution. In the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices meeting for June 19-20, 2002, Dr. Thomas Mack made the following comments:
As you probably know, I'm at the University of Southern California School of Medicine. I've been out of the smallpox game for roughly 40 years. My credentials include probably spending more time working up population-based outbreaks of smallpox than virtually anybody ever has. We spent three years in Sheikhupura district in Pakistan and worked up 121 outbreaks, which we estimated were roughly 85 to 90 percent of all the smallpox that occurred in that population of a million or so people.
[...]
And by and large, transmission within social limits is what occurs, not within the population at large. And these, by and large, cannot be sustained. In fact, were there no smallpox eradication program, my guess is that smallpox would have died out anyway, it just would have taken a lot longer.
[...]
If people are worried about endemic smallpox, it disappeared from this country not because of our mass herd immunity. It disappeared because of our economic development. And that's why it disappeared from Europe and many other countries, and it will not be sustained here, even if there were several importations, I'm sure. It's not from universal vaccination.
For the rest of the story regarding smallpox, Suzanne Humphries, MD, covers the subject in-depth in the video Dr. Suzanne Humphries discusses smallpox from 1797 - 2005.
influenza vaccine
In the article, Diseases with Unknown Etiology Trace Back to Mass Vaccination Against Influenza in 1976, James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., states:
The signature is undeniable. Something changed dramatically in 1976. To the skeptic: the increase is greater if one does not correct for total publications.
What changed was national mass vaccination against influenza.
[...]
When assessing risk, there are the knowns, the unknowns, and the unknowns one does [not] even know to look for. The “Reflections article, on the CDC website, shows that knowledge of risk of autoimmune disorders like Guillain-Barré Syndrome and deaths from vaccination was present from the beginning.
Some of the influenza (flu) vaccines contain a significant amount of thimerosal as a preservative (up to 25 mcg), or it may be used in the manufacturing process. In the latter case, trace amounts may still remain in the final product. No amount of mercury is safe for human ingestion, especially in the case of a developing child. The CDC recommends the influenza vaccine for pregnant mothers and children 6 months of age and older with repeated doses recommended annually. The manufacturer of the FLUVIRIN® brand of influenza vaccine states the following in their package insert:
FLUVIRIN® is not indicated for children less than 4 years of age because there is evidence of diminished immune response in this age group.
[...]
Safety and effectiveness of FLUVIRIN® have not been established in pregnant women, nursing mothers or children less than 4 years of age.
Although there are influenza vaccines that apparently contain no thimerosal, how many doctors actually read the package inserts? How many may be prescribing thimerosal laced vaccines to developing children or pregnant or nursing mothers? In an article on the World Mercury Project website titled, The CDC has just published a seismic study linking spontaneous abortions in women to flu vaccines, we find:
The vast majority of the flu vaccines in the years of the study were multi-dose formulations, containing 25 micrograms of mercury via the preservative thimerosal. In those years, out of approximately 150 million flu shots given in the U.S. annually, less than 50 million or 34% of those vaccines available for pregnant women were thimerosal-free.
[...]
In flu shot package inserts, vaccine manufacturers acknowledge that flu vaccines have never been shown to be safe for pregnant women. In fact, overwhelming science shows clearly that this preservative is neurotoxic and deadly and that it may be particularly dangerous to the fetus during pregnancy. When given to pregnant women, mercury transports specifically to the placenta and into the fetus, which does not have any mechanism for detoxification (Ablesohn et al.). In fact, it has been shown that mercury levels in cord blood are on average 70% higher than those in maternal blood (Stern et al.).
The new study confirms the findings of a previous study by Goldman. Using CDC’s VAERS database, Goldman showed a similar uptick in spontaneous abortions due to the flu shot, specifically during the time when pregnant women were receiving both the seasonal flu shot and the pandemic H1N1 flu shot. In fact, the rate of miscarriages increased 11-fold in 2009 when the H1N1 vaccine was added to the recommended schedule. During this time period, pregnant women who received both shots were typically exposed to 50 micrograms of mercury via thimerosal.
Are these and the many other problems associated with the influenza vaccine worth the risk given that it has been shown to have little effect on actually preventing the flu? I think many of us have either personally experienced, or at least know someone who contracted the flu soon after receiving the shot. The CDC tells us the following in a document titled Vaccine Effectiveness - How Well Does the Flu Vaccine Work?:
While vaccine effectiveness can vary, recent studies show that flu vaccination reduces the risk of flu illness by between 40% and 60% among the overall population during seasons when most circulating flu viruses are well-matched to the flu vaccine.
I think the key part of that sentence is "during seasons when most circulating flu viruses are well-matched to the flu vaccine". And how often does that occur? And how many is "most"? The effectiveness of the influenza vaccine from 2004 to 2017 has never exceeded 60% according to the CDC's "adjusted" figures and those figures are disputed by Gary G. Kohls, MD, in his article, Flu Shots, Fosamax and Pharmaceutical Fakery, where he states:
Misleading statistics that have appeared in medical journals are also used in drug commercials and by drug sales representatives when they try to convince us physicians to prescribe their company’s synthetic drugs.
What I am talking about is the common statistical trick of the trade called the Relative Risk Reduction [RRR], a statistic that intentionally inflates embarrassingly low or even statistically insignificant results that had been obtained from dubious research studies.
[...]
The Lancet article that revealed the lack of efficacy of flu shots did indeed report a “60% efficacy rate, and that phrase was prominently reported in the media, which pointed out the commonly-accepted past estimates of 90% efficacy. The problem was that both the 60% and the 90% figures were intentionally misleading RRR stats. But what wasn’t reported in the media coverage was the fact that the actual risk reduction (ARR) for the flu shots was a miniscule 1.5%. If that figure had been used, people would have balked at consenting to the shot. And, as any honest, non-co-opted, thinking person can see, the difference between the misleading figure of 60% and the real figure of 1.5% is huge – and, as ever, represents just another cunning statistical trick that is used to promote highly profitable products, that, incidentally, can also be toxic.
Tamiflu Again Linked to Extreme Adverse Reactions – The Vaccine Reaction
Three separate families have blamed Swiss pharmaceutical company Roche's antiviral drug Tamiflu (oseltamivir) for drug-induced very serious side effects-including a suicide-following administration of Tamiflu to their children during the 2017-2018 influenza season. There have been numerous cases reported in past years indicating a connection between the use of this antiviral drug and similar extreme reactions.
human papillomavirus / gardasil vaccine
The following is from the package insert for Gardasil for 2015. The 'Postmarketing Experience' section provides information about reported complications regarding the vaccine after it was approved for public use. The equivalent section in the package insert for Gardasil 9 for 2018 is almost identical:
6.2 Postmarketing Experience
The following adverse events have been spontaneously reported during post-approval use of GARDASIL. Because these events were reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not possible to reliably estimate their frequency or to establish a causal relationship to vaccine exposure.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders: Autoimmune hemolytic anemia, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, lymphadenopathy.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders: Pulmonary embolus.
Gastrointestinal disorders: Nausea, pancreatitis, vomiting.
General disorders and administration site conditions: Asthenia, chills, death, fatigue, malaise.
Immune system disorders: Autoimmune diseases, hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions, bronchospasm, and urticaria.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders: Arthralgia, myalgia.
Nervous system disorders: Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, dizziness, Guillain-Barré syndrome, headache, motor neuron disease, paralysis, seizures, syncope (including syncope associated with tonicclonic movements and other seizure-like activity) sometimes resulting in falling with injury, transverse myelitis.
Infections and infestations: cellulitis.
Vascular disorders: Deep venous thrombosis.
Gardasil Vaccine Likely To Be Biggest Medical Scandal Of All Time – According To Former Merck Doctor
Since its introduction, the Gardasil vaccine has been the focus of more controversy than any other vaccine. Even among those who fully support vaccination, Gardasil is the black sheep. A doctor formerly with Merck now says that he predicts that it will be "the greatest medical scandal of all times."
Dr. Bernard Dalbergue, former pharmaceutical industry physician with the company that manufactures Gardasil, recently gave an interview to French publication Principes de Santé (Health Principles), in which he blasts the vaccine as dangerous and "useless," though it "costs a fortune."
What is worse, he says, is that "decision-makers at all levels are aware of it!" Dalbergue charges that approval of the Gardasil vaccine was not based on valid studies but on financial profit, and alleges that everybody involved knew how worthless the vaccine was when it was approved. He is not alone in accusations of fraud.
Hayley Willard was one of the first to receive a Gardasil vaccination at 15 years of age in Newfoundland, Canada in 2010. Up until then, she was a very active extroverted person who was actively involved in figure skating competitions.
Her mother Dana explained that Hayley was a healthy, enthusiastic daughter until Gardasil came into her life, although she had minor short-lived adverse reaction from vaccinations before.
But after her Gardasil shot she was showing signs of autoimmune issues. Her energy level decreased, she was easily fatigued and looking pale. Then she became sluggishly lethargic with low energy, began gaining weight, was having migraines, and other symptoms. She complained that she was not feeling right and beside herself.
Her skating became erratic and she injured herself while practicing. Cysts were discovered in her ovaries, an area that was never an issue with Hayley before. She began having anxiety attacks that were unusual for her and inexplicable.
None of the doctors would even imply that the Gardasil vaccine had anything to with her condition. They wanted to prescribe antidepressants instead.
But Dana was intuitively suspicious and began researching on the side effects of Gardasil and other vaccines. She soon began realizing it wasn't a coincidence that her health issues began immediately after Hayley's HPV vaccination. Her immune system had been compromised severely.
Many reported adverse events that Dana discovered from the HPV vaccine included what Hayley was experiencing, often even worse.
But the worst event occurred in 2013 when Hayley was diagnosed with leukemia.
U.S. court pays $6 million to Gardasil victims - Washington Times
WASHINGTON, April 10, 2013 - Gardasil, the vaccine for HPV (human papillomavirus), may not be as safe as backers claim.
Judicial Watch announced it has received documents from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) revealing that its National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) has awarded $5,877,710 dollars to 49 victims in claims made against the highly controversial HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccines. To date 200 claims have been filed with VICP, with barely half adjudicated.
It's Official – Teens Diagnosed With MS After Gardasil Vaccines – Collective Evolution
According to VAERS, the CDC's vaccine adverse event reporting system, there have been 53 cases of multiple sclerosis reported after vaccination with Gardasil and two following the new HPV vaccine Gardasil 9. This is the tip of the iceberg as very few adverse events are reported with most people ignorant of where or how they are to go about the process of having their adverse health event recorded.
Dr. Suzanne Humphries on Gardasil HPV Vaccine
Sacrificial Virgins - The Dangers of the HPV Vaccine (2017)
The Human Papilloma Vaccine (HPV) is a treatment in widespread use but its efficacy in preventing cancer is medically unproven, while unintended, adverse reactions are blighting and even ending the lives of girls and young women across the world. However, pharmaceutical manufacturers and many health authorities are refusing to acknowledge there is a problem and the medical community is continuing to offer the vaccine.
Sacrificial Virgins - so named because the vaccine is often given to girls before they become sexually active - exposes increasing evidence of serious neurological damage following the HPV injections. It calls for the vaccine to be withdrawn in the hope that this will help to halt another global tragedy.
Manufactured Crisis: HPV, Hype & Horror (2018 Documentary)
A film by The Alliance for Natural Health, delves into the all too often ignored dark side of this unnecessary vaccine, interviewing families whose lives have been forever altered after their young daughters suffered life-threatening or lethal side effects following Gardasil vaccination.
The pharmaceutical industry used faulty research, paid doctors and manipulated the media to push an unsafe vaccine onto the market. They used political pressure to force this vaccine onto the public, despite any demonstrable public threat. The result has been the devastation of many young girls' lives. Through interviews with leading experts, victims, and our own analysis of the vaccines themselves, the Alliance for Natural Health uncovered a conspiracy of greed that is being perpetrated on families around the world.
vaccine "testing"
Many might presume that vaccines are subject to the same rigorous tests, trials and approval process as other drugs before they are released to the public, however this is not the case. One of the glaring problems has been the introduction of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program which insulates vaccine manufacturers from those seeking damages and thus manufacturers have far less incentive to spend any more money and time than absolutely necessary in order make their products safer. Following are several examples which i think clearly demonstrate that profits supersede concerns for the wellbeing of human lives.
Problems with drug testing are not limited to vaccines either. Consider this example of an anti-depressant trial:
Paroxetine manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline later released trial reports revealing that teens in the study had higher rates of self-harm and threatening to commit suicide than those on placebos.
Now GSK has given independent researchers access to the study’s data set. Sifting through it, David Healy, a psychiatrist at the Hergest Unit in Bangor, UK, and his team found 15 instances of suicidal behaviour among 12 teenagers taking the drug, compared with four in the similarly sized placebo group (BMJ, DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h4320). The company’s trial reports had suggested only 10 instances in those taking paroxetine.
In a statement, GSK said product labels have, for more than a decade, carried clear warnings about the increased risk of suicidal behaviour in adolescents. “As such, we don’t believe this reanalysis affects patient safety.
GlaxoSmithKline is a major manufacturer of vaccines, by the way. Thankfully those kids apparently survived the trial. Others were not so lucky:
A 19-year-old college student who had shown no outward signs of depression killed herself over the weekend at an Eli Lilly & Company laboratory in Indianapolis where she had been participating in a company drug trial for an experimental antidepressant.
[...]
Four days before her death, Ms. Johnson was taken off Cymbalta and given a placebo.
[...]
Four other patients who were given the drug during earlier trials also committed suicide, the company said.
In a March 2018 article published on Collective Evolution titled, Shocking Video: US Advisory Committee Approves Vaccine After Admitting It Has No Safety Testing, we get a glimpse of the final approval process for a vaccine by the Advisory Committee On Immunization Practices (ACIP). In this case the vaccine is a new Hepatitis B vaccine manufactured by Dynanax Technologies. The vaccine contains two new adjuvants, HBsAg and CpG 1018. Prior to voting, one unidentified member of the committee asks an important question. Following is the exchange:
Q: Um, is there any comment on using this vaccine at the same time with other adjuvanted vaccines?
A: We have no data to um make um, a recommendation one way or the other.
Amanda Cohn then expands on the previous answer:
So, um, just so you... just to sort of put this in context of other vaccines, while preclinical studies were not done using these vaccines simultaneously, our general approach to immunization is that, um, they should be given... they can be given at the same time in different, um, limbs.
Dr. Hunter than asks another question:
Dr. Hunter: Are adjuvanted... multiple adjuvanted vaccines, uh used in Europe or other markets?
Nana Bennett: Doctor Ward, do you wanna comment?
Dr. Ward: Not to... not to my knowledge.
Though there is no data regarding certain critical safety aspects of the vaccine, the committee immediately and unanimously approves it. Only after giving their approval do two doctors raise additional key questions about the vaccine. Following is one exchange:
Q: And does anybody, um around the table... we don't need to go around, um and [unintelligible] but does anybody have any comments they wish to make, about their vote?
A: Sarah, just uh, uh, a slight reservation. I think this is a huge advance and a step forward. I... I am concerned about that signal -- that myocardial infarction signal -- I am concerned about the use of this new adjuvant and certainly... or just to continue to look at the post marketing data carefully.
Document: Vaccine Package Insert for the HEPLISAV-B (Hepatitis B) vaccine
From a 2007 CDC article titled, Cancer, Simian Virus 40 (SV40), and Polio Vaccine Fact Sheet - Vaccine Safety, which has since been removed from their website, we read:
- More than 98 million Americans received one or more doses of polio vaccine from 1955 to 1963 when a proportion of vaccine was contaminated with SV40; it has been estimated that 10–30 million Americans could have received an SV40 contaminated dose of vaccine.
- SV40 virus has been found in certain types of cancer in humans, but it has not been determined that SV40 causes these cancers.
The article, CDC Admits 98 Million Americans Received Polio Vaccine Contaminated With Cancer Virus, published on REALfarmacy.com, expands on the relationship between SV40 and cancer:
SV40 is believed to suppress the transcriptional properties of the tumor-suppressing genes in humans through the SV40 Large T-antigen and SV40 Small T-antigen. Mutated genes may contribute to uncontrolled cellular proliferation, leading to cancer.
Michele Carbone, Assistant Professor of Pathology at Loyola University in Chicago, has recently isolated fragments of the SV-40 virus in human bone cancers and in a lethal form of lung cancer called mesothelioma. He found SV-40 in 33% of the osteosarcoma bone cancers studied, in 40% of other bone cancers, and in 60% of the mesotheliomas lung cancers, writes Geraldo Fuentes.
Dr. Michele Carbone openly acknowledged HIV/AIDS was spread by the hepatitis B vaccine produced by Merck & Co. during the early 1970s. It was the first time since the initial transmissions took place in 1972-74, that a leading expert in the field of vaccine manufacturing and testing has openly admitted the Merck & Co. liability for AIDS.
The matter-of-fact disclosure came during discussions of polio vaccines contaminated with SV40 virus which caused cancer in nearly every species infected by injection. Many authorities now admit much, possibly most, of the world’s cancers came from the Salk and Sabin polio vaccines, and hepatitis B vaccines, produced in monkeys and chimps.
It is said mesothelioma is a result of asbestos exposure, but research reveals that 50% of the current mesotheliomas being treated no longer occurs due to asbestos but rather the SV-40 virus contained in the polio vaccination. In addition, according to researchers from the Institute of Histology and General Embryology of the University of Ferrara, SV-40 has turned up in a variety other tumors. By the end of 1996, dozens of scientists reported finding SV40 in a variety of bone cancers and a wide range of brain cancers, which had risen 30 percent over the previous 20 years.
The SV-40 virus is now being detected in tumors removed from people never inoculated with the contaminated vaccine, leading some to conclude that those infected by the vaccine might be spreading SV40.
Their press release stated:
"The analysis confirmed that Dengvaxia provides persistent protective benefit against dengue fever in those who had prior infection. For those not previously infected by dengue virus, however, the analysis found that in the longer term, more cases of severe disease could occur following vaccination upon a subsequent dengue infection."
[...]
More than 800,000 Filipino children have received at least one dose of Dengvaxia, the first licensed vaccine for the virus, since the Philippine Department of Health launched the vaccination drive in schools in 2016.
[...]
In the vaccine marketing trade publication FiercePharma, it is being reported that Sanofi is not going to let the “Dengvaxia mess in the Philippines stop them from seeking FDA approval for the vaccine to be sold in the U.S.
Sanofi won’t let Philippines Dengvaxia mess deter it from seeking U.S. approval: report
Dengue is a tropical disease spread mainly by mosquitoes and very uncommon in the U.S., so why is Sanofi seeking to get the vaccine into the U.S. market?
According to FiercePharma:
"While dengue rarely occurs in the continental U.S., it is endemic in Puerto Rico, as well as in Latin America and Southeast Asia, and could pose a threat to people traveling to those regions, according to the CDC.
"An FDA approval also would go a long way to easing concerns elsewhere about the safety of the vaccine."
The other huge reason not reported in the FiercePharma article is that Sanofi would not face legal prosecution for a faulty vaccine product in the U.S., since the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 protects all vaccine manufacturers from being sued in court due to injuries and deaths resulting from vaccines.