"The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness." -- Dr. Richard Horton, Editor in Chief of The Lancet, one of the worlds most respected, peer-reviewed medical journals, 2015 (source)
introduction
IMPORTANT UPDATE: March, 2022: This series of articles was written prior to my research into 'germ theory' -- the theory that viruses exist and can be transmitted among humans -- and therefore the word "virus" is used throughout these articles given my understanding at that time. Subsequent research however has raised many scientifically sound questions and serious problems with both germ theory and virology, particularly with the methods used by virologists to "purify" a virus, as well as alternative factors that can lead to disease and large outbreaks of disease. There are two books i would highly recommend for those that want to better understand the subject; The Contagion Myth - Why Viruses (including Coronavirus) Are Not the Cause of Disease (PDF) by Dr. Thomas Cowan, MD, and Virus Mania (PDF), 3rd edition, by Torsten Engelbrecht, Dr. Claus Köhnlein, MD, Dr. Samantha Bailey, MD, and Dr. Stefano Scoglio, BSc PhD.
Those who challenge widely held and long standing beliefs often face harsh criticism, personal attacks and ostracization. The adult ego and entrenched belief systems, even among those within the scientific and medical communities, can by themselves stifle relevant discussion and prevent further and necessary research. Far more worrying is the immense influence the multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical industry has upon the scientific community, medical schooling, government policy and public perception. What the general public may perceive as scientifically valid information is often little more than thinly disguised propaganda disseminated by those having a vested interest in obtaining a particular result.
If you surmise that i am one of those "anti-vaccine" people, your assessment is not accurate, nor is it generally true that the plethora of scientists, healthcare professionals and parents who question the safety and efficacy of vaccines, are anti-vaccine; many are simply pro-safe vaccines. The government and the mainstream media use terms like "anti-vaxer" in an attempt to marginalize the rapidly growing number of professionals and parents who challenge the status quo, as though there are only two kinds of people who hold an opinion on vaccines; the right-think type who postulate that all vaccines are safe, and the wrong-think type who postulate that all vaccines are dangerous and must be avoided. The safety and efficacy of vaccines and the vaccination programs in the United States and elsewhere is not a binary one, nor by any stretch of the imagination is the science settled as the public is led to believe. Science is never settled, it is an ongoing process of discovery.
I would like to state up front that although i am highly critical of western medicine, i am less critical of the front-line physicians who i believe are largely well intentioned and genuinely concerned with the welfare of their patients. The problem is not the ethics of the doctor as much as it is the monetary wall that the pharmaceutical industry has erected between the doctor and safer healthcare solutions. One cannot accurately access the issue of vaccine safety, nor the healthcare system in general, without understanding the tremendous influence that the pharmaceutical industry has upon the aforementioned institutions. Having studied a wide array of politically sensitive topics for many years, corruption is not a subject i'm foreign to, however the shear scale of blatant corruption and obscene criminality that exists within the healthcare system in the United States and elsewhere is impressive, even to me. The reader must account for this when considering any study published by the FDA, the CDC, pharmaceutical companies, or other vested interests, as well as the advice offered by their doctor since the education doctors receive is filtered through these heavily corrupt institutions.
Not all science is bad science, but not all science is sound science either and the trend seems to be getting worse as for-profit corporations, lobbyists and politics gain more influence in the field of science. Politics and greed are major forces which underlie virtually all of our primary institutions and to think for a moment that the healthcare industry has remained free of corruption, or even largely free of corruption, is a mistake of epic proportions. Raking in approximately $24 billion annually, and afforded blanket liability protection by the U.S. government, the vaccine industry is an incredibly lucrative one and where there is money there is greed. This is one reason for the dramatic increase in the number of vaccines a child is subjected to today (approximately 70 injections as of this writing). Meanwhile the overall health of the population, at least in the U.S., is experiencing a sharp and steady decline. We must ask why.
the claims
Following are some of the popular claims regarding vaccines. Evidence to support the responses will be provided in this series of articles.
CLAIM: Vaccines are safe.
RESPONSE: In the case of BRUESEWITZ ET AL. v. WYETH LLC, FKA WYETH, INC., ET AL., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that vaccines are "unavoidably unsafe". While that alone ought to raise serious doubt about the safety of vaccines, there are multiple other vectors from which to attack this claim, one of the more obvious is to question why, if it were true, the U.S. government has provided vaccine manufactures with blanket liability protection through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program which, as of this writing, has paid out approximately $4.5 billion dollars since its inception in 1988. It must also be noted that, according to a Harvard commissioned study, less than 1% of vaccine related injuries are actually reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Another problem with this claim is that parents, patients and physicians are typically not well educated regarding vaccines, their ingredients and potential side-effects, nor are many aware that VAERS even exists. As a result of this ignorance, parents of children who suffer serious problems after receiving one or more vaccines are typically told that the reaction is normal, or a coincidence, or simply that the it cannot possibly be attributed to the vaccine.
CLAIM: The science is settled.
RESPONSE: Any remotely reasonable scientist will tell you that science is never settled. Science is a constantly evolving process of discovery and revision. Furthermore, the field of science is not at all immune from corruption or bias by vested interests with billions or trillions of dollars at stake, such as the pharmaceutical industry. Evidence of corruption in science can clearly be seen in the cherry-picking of studies for publication where studies that produce a result which is favorable to a vested interest are published in far greater number than those which are not. One example is an anti-depressant for which there were 38 favorable studies and 36 negative. Of these, 37 of the positive studies were published verses only 3 of the negative studies and this is hardly an isolated case.
CLAIM: Vaccines save lives.
RESPONSE: This claim is far less concrete than the public is led to believe. There are many factors to be considered, including side-effects, virus propagation through live virus vaccines, the validity of 'germ theory', artificial verses natural immunity, the latter of which is compromised as a direct result of vaccines, and many others which will be explored in this series of articles.
CLAIM: Unvaccinated people spread disease.
RESPONSE: Many disease outbreaks in cases where live virus vaccines were administered can be attributed to people who were fully vaccinated against the disease being spread. This can be seen in the cases of the polio, smallpox and measles vaccines for example. In the case of the polio vaccine, it is estimated that 70% of people with polio today contracted the disease from those who were vaccinated. It is also alarming that some of those who are ardently pro-vaccine use this as an argument to support compulsory vaccination, as though the right of a parent to make decisions regarding their children's welfare should be excised. Finally, if vaccines worked, why would a vaccinated person be concerned with the unvaccinated?
CLAIM: Mercury has been removed from vaccines.
RESPONSE: As of the 2018-2019 season, thimerosal, an organomercurial compound, is present in all of the multi-dose influenza vaccines, as well as in several others, though primarily in trace amounts. Mercury is extremely neurotoxic and no studies have ever been sanctioned by the CDC regarding the safety of thimerosal when injected into the bloodstream.
CLAIM: There is no link between vaccines and autism.
RESPONSE: Even if you consider only studies published by the CDC, there is indeed strong evidence that vaccines can and have caused neurological damage, including problems which appear on the autism spectrum. When you consider a larger body of evidence, the link becomes more concrete. This is not to say that vaccines necessarily cause autism, but rather that there appears to be a statistically significant link between the two.
CLAIM: Dr. William Thompson, the CDC whistle-blower, is a fraud.
RESPONSE: While Dr. Thompson has certainly been professionally, personally and persistently attacked, no one has creditably refuted the actual results of his work regarding an association between the MMR vaccine and an increased rate of autism in African-American boys when the vaccine is administered at a very young age. By the way, Dr. Thompson is not anti-vaccine as he is painted by the media, nor did he ever state that vaccines cause autism. Dr. Thompson simply exposed the fact that the CDC manipulated and destroyed data in order to downplay a statistically significant link between the MMR vaccine and autism in African-American boys. As a result of his findings, Dr. Thompson simply recommended that the MMR vaccine be administered at a later age when the risk of developing autism was less significant.
CLAIM: Dr. Andrew Wakefield is a fraud.
RESPONSE: The Wakefield peer-reviewed Lancet paper was published along with 12 of his highly creditable colleagues. Are they all frauds too? Furthermore, the UK General Medical Council overturned the findings of misconduct against Dr. Wakefield in 2012 and this was later acknowledged by the Lancet. It appears that the National Institutes of Health, who has published well over 100 articles and papers referring to Dr. Wakefield, several of which are highly critical, has failed to acknowledge the findings of the UK High Court and as of February, 2018, 6 years after Wakefield was exonerated, there is no mention of the councils findings on his Wikipedia page.
CLAIM: All of the anti-vaccine rhetoric started with Dr. Andrew Wakefield.
RESPONSE: This is mainstream nonsense. The controversy regarding the safety and efficacy of vaccines dates back to the mid 1800s and the live virus smallpox vaccine which caused a large number of deaths and spread the disease further. Though the contributions of Dr. Wakefield are non-trivial, his work is a blip on an immensely larger radar.
CLAIM: The rise in the rate of autism is due to changes in the diagnostic criteria and increased public awareness.
RESPONSE: If the first part of that statement were true, we should have seen a sudden spike in the rate of autism cases shortly after the diagnostic criteria was altered, after which the curve should have normalized, however we are instead seeing a massive, exponential rise with no ceiling in sight. Furthermore, it appears there were no changes to the diagnostic criteria between 1994 and 2013, yet the rate of autism continued to skyrocket during that time. According to the CDC, the number of autistic children in 2002 was 1 in 150 and just 10 years later it was 1 in 68. A study by the National Center for Health Statistics put the number at 1 in 35 for 2016 and the rate is expected by some to climb to 1 in 2 or 3 by 2025. As for the second part of the claim, the public doesn't define diagnostic criteria.
VAERS sample reports
The CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) started collecting data around 1990 and the total number of vaccine adverse events from its inception, not including the COVID-19 vaccines, was 882,404, Of these, 41,934 were death, life threatening, or permanent disability events.
As of 30-May-2022, there were a total of 1,277,980 adverse events associated with the COVID-19 vaccines specifically. Of these, 106,357 were death, life threatening, or permanent disability events.
Following is a small sampling of vaccine injury reports from the VAERS database for the COVID-19 vaccines up to 30-May-2022:
Vaccine administered with no immediate adverse reaction at 11:29am. Vaccine screening questions were completed and resident was not feeling sick and temperature was 98F. At approximately 1:30pm the resident passed away.
Within 24 hours of receiving the vaccine, fever and respiratory distress, and anxiety developed requiring oxygen, morphine and ativan. My Mom passed away on the evening of 12/26/2020.
Patient was a 16yr female who received Pfizer vaccine 3/19/21 at vaccine clinic and presented with ongoing CPR to the ED 3/28/21 after cardiac arrest at home. Patient placed on ECMO and imaging revealed bilateral large pulmonary embolism as likely etiology of arrest. Risk factors included oral contraceptive use. Labs have since confirmed absence of Factor V leiden or prothrombin gene mutation. Patient declared dead by neurologic criteria 3/30/21.
Death due to a Subarachnoid hemorrhage
Cerebral vein thrombosis; This is a spontaneous report from a non-contactable consumer via Regulatory Authority (RA), downloaded from the Regulatory Authority-WEB, regulatory authority number DE-PEI-CADR2021061101. Sender's (Case) Safety Report Unique Identifier DE-PEI-202100053266. A 28-year-old female patient received BNT162B2 (COMIRNATY) via an unspecified route of administration on 01May2021 at 08:00 (at the age of 28-year-old) (Batch/Lot Number: EX3510) at 0.3 mL single dose for COVID-19 immunisation. Relevant medical history and concomitant medications were not reported. On 01May2021, the patient experienced cerebral vein thrombosis (thrombosis of venous sinuses) with fatal outcome. The patient died on 01May2021 at 14:30.
pt was a nursing home pt. pt received first dose of covid vaccine. pt was monitored for 15 minutes after getting shot. staff reported that pt was 15 days post covid. Pt passed away with in 90 minutes of getting vaccine
pt received vaccine at covid clinic on 12/30 at approximately 3:30, pt vomited 4 minutes after receiving shot--dark brown vomit, staff reported pt had vomited night before. Per staff report pt became short of breath between 6 and 7 pm that night. Pt had DNR on file. pt passed away at approximately 10pm. Staff reported pt was 14 + days post covid
Resident received vaccine per pharmacy at the facility at 5 pm. Approximately 6:45 resident found unresponsive and EMS contacted. Upon EMS arrival at facility, resident went into cardiac arrest, code initiated by EMS and transported to hospital. Resident expired at hospital at approximately 8 pm
Resident received vaccine in am and expired that afternoon.
Resident found unresponsive without pulse, respirations at 04:30 CPR performed, expired at 04:52 by Rescue
syncopal episode - arrested - CPR - death
Patient presented 5/16/2021 with 1 week dizziness, fever and sore throat, found to have acute myopericarditis c/b cardiogenic shock and bradycardic arrest.
Resident exhibited no adverse events during 30 minute monitoring following vaccine administration. Resident found without pulse at 1900.
Vaccine received at about 0900 on 01/04/2021 at her place of work, Medical Center, where she was employed as a housekeeper. About one hour after receiving the vaccine she experienced a hot flash, nausea, and feeling like she was going to pass out after she had bent down. Later at about 1500 hours she appeared tired and lethargic, then a short time later, at about 1600 hours, upon arrival to a friends home she complained of feeling hot and having difficulty breathing. She then collapsed, then when medics arrived, she was still breathing slowly then went into cardiac arrest and was unable to be revived.
Sudden death; This is a spontaneous report from a contactable physician and consumer. A 41-year-old female patient received the first dose of BNT162B2 (COMIRNATY; Lot Number: UNKNOWN), via an unspecified route of administration on 30Dec2020 at 0.3 mL single dose for COVID-19 immunisation. Medical history included hypertension. The patient's concomitant medications were not reported. On 01Jan2021, the patient experienced sudden death.
Patient had been diagnosed with COVID-19 on Dec. 11th, 2020. Symptoms were thought to have started on 12/5/2020. Received Moderna vaccine on 12/23. Unexpected death on 1/8/2021. Resuscitation attempts unsuccessful
Cardiac event, 2 days after vaccination, patient expired.
found dead; This spontaneous case was reported by a consumer and describes the occurrence of DEATH (found dead) in a 22-year-old female patient who received mRNA-1273 (Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine) (batch no. 032m20a) for COVID-19 vaccination. Concurrent medical conditions included Traumatic brain injury, Movement disorder, Seizures (since she was a baby at 11 months old) and Speech loss. Concomitant products included CLONAZEPAM, OXCARBAZEPINE (TRILEPTAL) and GABAPENTIN for an unknown indication. On 19-Mar-2021, the patient received first dose of mRNA-1273 (Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine) (Intramuscular) 1 dosage form. Death occurred on 04-Apr-2021
Fever, shortness of breath and chest pain that resulted in a heart attack a few hours after vaccination
Patient received COVID vaccination around 12:15pm. Patient was monitored for the appropriate amount of time by nursing staff. Patient passed away at 2:15pm.
RECIEVED VACCINE 1/8/21 EXPIRED UNEXPECTED 1/10/21, NO ADVERSE REACTIONS NOTED
"1-2-2021 10:30 PM Complained Right arm/back hurt - took Tylenol 1-3-2021 Complained Right arm hurt, dizzy 1-4-2021 Felt better - did laundry, daughter found her deceased at 3:30 pm. Dr. at hospital said it was ""cardiac event"" according to death certificate."
Acute anterior MI with death
Cardiac arrest; This is a spontaneous report from a contactable physician downloaded from the Regulatory Authority (RA)-WEB, regulatory authority number NO-NOMAADVRE-FHI-2021-Uwzy12. A 29-year-old female patient received BNT162b2 (COMIRNATY, Solution for injection, Lot number- EX6564) intramuscularly on 07May2021 as 2nd dose, single dose (at the age of 29-years-old) for COVID-19 immunization. Patient medical history included intellectual disability from an unknown date and ongoing. The concomitant medications were not reported. Historical vaccine included BNT162b2 (COMIRNATY, Solution for injection, Lot number- UNKNOWN) via an unspecified route of administration as 1st dose, single dose for COVID-19 immunization. The patient experienced cardiac arrest on 17May2021, the patient fell the same day as the vaccination (07May2021) and this resulted in back pain afterwards.
DEATH FROM BLOOD CLOT
atient had massive acute intracranial hemorrhage. Was found down in bathroom. In ED CT scan showed large intraventricular hemorrhage, EVD placed, patient progressed to massive brain swelling and infarctions, decompressive craniectomy, unable to control intracranial pressure, parents agreed to DNR status and patient is not expected to survive.
This regulatory authority case was reported by a physician and describes the occurrence of PULMONARY EMBOLISM (PULMONARY EMBOLISM, PULMONARY INFARCTION, CARDIAC ARREST), CARDIAC ARREST (PULMONARY EMBOLISM, PULMONARY INFARCTION, CARDIAC ARREST) and PULMONARY INFARCTION (PULMONARY EMBOLISM, PULMONARY INFARCTION, CARDIAC ARREST) in a 24-year-old female patient who received mRNA-1273 (COVID 19 Vaccine Moderna) (batch no. 31946) for COVID-19 immunisation. No medical history was reported by the reporter.
The first dose of vaccine (lot number EW0176) was taken on 05/06/2021, and the second dose of vaccine (lot number EW0186) was taken on 05/27/2021. within 12 hours of second does she had gotten severe headache, she couldn't eat for severe vomiting, she said she felt like she was hit by a truck, and had the chills. she would go from really cold to really hot. She couldn't keep anything down even water. On the third day after the vaccine she was very sick and we ( the family) thought she was sleeping but when we went to try and wake her up we discovered her dead.
Lower extremity deep vein thromboses, pulmonary thromboses, cerebral thromboses and hemorrhage, death
Patient received COVID-19 (Moderna) vaccine from the Health Department on afternoon of January 8, 2021 and went to sleep approximately 2300 that night. Was found unresponsive in bed the following morning and pronounced dead at 1336 on January 9, 2021
Resident had seizure like activity followed by a vagel response with large bowel movement. Resident then began to show signs of blood clot to left lower extremity. No pedal pulse, area on leg warm to touch. Left lower leg now cold to touch, stiff, purple and white in color. No other signs of modeling, body warm to touch, no fever noted. Respirations and pulse increased with low oxygen levels. Resident not responding to stimuli.
Patient received the 1st dose of Moderna and was found deceased in her home the next day.
RESIDENT 1ST DOSE OF MODERNA VACCINE ADMINISTERED ON 01/04/2021 AT 8:30PM, RESIDENT FOUND UNRESPONSIVE ON 01/05/2021.
on 1/8/2021 17:30 patient taken to ER, cerebellar hemorrhage, stroke, aneurysm
"Cardiac Arrest; Patient was found pulseless and breathless 20 minutes following the vaccine administration.
This person was found to be deceased on routine rounds during the night, 3am. No symptoms of reaction noted post vaccine. No injection site reaction. No reports of any allergic reaction.
No adverse effects from vaccination seen on 1/2/21. On 1/6/21 resident was seen by Dr and her baclofen pump was refilled with 20 ml Baclofen 4,000mcg/ml. ITB Rate increased by 6% to 455.5 mcg/day simple continuous rate over 3 days. On 1/8/21 at 0615 resident was shaking, lower extremities mottled, Sa02 70%, pulse 45. Oxygen started at 2 L/m per NC. At 0715 her primary physician was notified as well as her daughter. Oxygen increased to 4 L/min, sats at 83%. SOA noted, reported all over pain. At 0850 when they attempted to reposition the resident, she was not responsive. Licensed nurse assessed her and no heartbeat heard or pulse found.
Initial pain in back of head and extreme headache. Some vomiting. At emergency, went into coma and was intubated. Hole drilled in skull to relieve pressure. MRI taken. Lot of bleeding in brain - anuerism lead to death approximately 14 hours after initial symptoms.
On 1/11/21 noted with headache, nausea/vomiting, severe melaise. On 1/12/21 resident expired.
71yo female resident who died after receiving Pfizer BioNTech vaccine. On 1/14/2021, VS taken at 10am, B/P 99/60, O2 sats, 95% (trach w/O2). At 11:30am, Patient showed no s/sx of distress, A&Ox3. At 11:50am, a nurse went to perform a COVID test and assessment (the facility is experiencing an outbreak), and found the patient unresponsive on the bathroom floor. CPR was immediately started; no shock advised per AED; 12:15pm EMS arrived and took over. At 12:38pm, EMT called time of death.
Resident received Moderna vaccine on 12/23/2020 around 5 pm. At approximately 3:35 am on 12/25/2020, resident had a CVA and died on 1/1/2021 at 3:00 am.
Around 00:50am on 01/15/21, C.N.A. reported that the resident looked different and not responding. Initiated Code Blue and started CPR. 911 arrived and pronounced resident dead at 1:01 am.
Letal death; Asystolia; Pulmonary embolism; This is a spontaneous report from a non-contactable physician downloaded from the Medicines Agency (MA) WEB (DE-PEI-PEI2021000071). An 82-year-old female patient received BNT162B2 (COMIRNATY; Lot number: EJ6797), intramuscularly from 30Dec2020 at 0.3 mL, single for COVID-19 immunization. Medical history included diabetes and hypertension. The patient's concomitant medications were not reported. At the time of vaccination there was no evidence of decompensation of the underlying disease. The patient experienced letal death, asystolia and pulmonary embolism on 31Dec2020, which were reported as life-threatening and fatal.
Resident received vaccination on January 15, 2021. She was found unresponsive with shallow respirations on the morning of January 16, 2021 and was sent to ER via ambulance. The resident was admitted to medical center ICU where she passed away later that day.
COVID 19 Vaccination administered by pharmacy staff. No adverse effect at the present time. Staff will continue to observe adverse reaction. Will continue to monitor. Patient at start of shift awake in the bed. Pt at 3am was on the commode leaned to the side. Patient body still warm to touch no pulse.
Cardiac arrest; This is a spontaneous report received from a contactable other HCP by Pfizer from the Regulatory Authority. The regulatory authority report number is GB-MHRA-ADR 24593178. A 53-years-old female patient received the first dose of BNT162B2 (PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE; Lot number: EL0379, Expiry date: Apr2021, use by 16Jan2021, 09:50), via an unspecified route of administration on 14Jan2021 at single dose for covid-19 immunization. The patient had no known previous medical history.
At 8 weeks pregnancy (2 weeks after first shot) started bleeding and had a subchorionic hematoma. By 10 week subchorionic hematoma resolved. Received second shot and of Feb. 1 week later, at 12 weeks pregnancy , fetus had no heart beat! It measured normal size (as expected) and limited normal first trimester anatomy by ultrasound. But NO heart beat. Something insulted this placenta to lead to fetal demise.
Died January 21 after she received an mRNA shot; A spontaneous report was received from a consumer via social media concerning a 28-year-old, female patient who received Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine (mRNA-1273) and died two days later (death).
Death 5 hours after second shot. Decedent contacted her mother around 3:30 c/o difficulty breathing. Died on 4/1/20
Patient reported difficulty breathing and chest pain; suffered cardiac arrest and death
Blood clot blocking blood flow to brain - 1st episode: ( 3/12/21) stabilized, minor limited movement left side - 2nd episode: (3/24/21) no blood flow to brain, death (maintained on life support for organ donation).