“The [Nuremberg Trial was] the biggest legal farce in history… the legend about six million supposedly murdered Jews acquired a legal basis, even though the court did not have a single document signed by A. Hitler concerning the extermination of Jews…” — Dr. Petras Stankeras, a Lithuanian historian and government adviser, 2010
The phrase “final solution” which is attributed to Hitler, actually appeared first in reference to Germany in the 1941 book, Germany Must Perish! by Theodore N. Kaufman, an American Jew whose proposed “final solution” to the German problem was infinitely more barbaric than the expulsion of the Jews from Germany as was proposed by Adolf Hitler. Kaufman called for the total destruction of not only Germany as a country, but the complete eradication of the German people by means of forced sterilization. Following are some relevant quotes from his book (emphasis added):
Chapter 6, A Middle Road?:
With Germanism shown thus to be the very soul of conquest and world-dominion, may we not then pose this question: Is it possible for the world, in any manner, to find some compromise that will allow both it and Germany to exist side by side in peace and justice? In concrete terms, were peace declared tomorrow to Germany’s apparent satisfaction, could this nation born and bred on blood, be expected to be appeased for more than the immediate future?
We should like to hope so; but the history of that nation cuts the hope out of our heart.
The majority of people claim that Hitler alone stands between war and peace. But is it Hitler alone who smashed Austria, Czecho-Slovakia, Holland, Poland, Norway, Belgium and France and the Balkan countries? Is it Hitler alone who tortures and oppresses these people?
But for argument’s sake, let us assume that Hitler is no more and the world is seeking a just basis for peace with Germany. We quickly discover that the Germany of our dreams is not the Germany of dread reality.
For, in the first place, there is no longer living in Germany that so-called “older generation” with whom reasonable talk might be made. This woeful handful is gone and forgotten and in its stead stands that brown-shirted legion singing that glorious Horst-Wessel paean: Today Europe, tomorrow all the World! Enlightened reason with perverted chanters of a world-dirge composed by a drunkard, written in a brothel and dedicated to a pimp?
What then of a democratic Germany?
Democracy for a nation that has destroyed a mighty people of some thirty million Poles with the epithet “such a servant race has no existence”? Democracy for a people who believe only in superiority, not equality?
Well then, break Germany up into small autonomous states?
That Pan-Germanism which has received blind allegiance in Berlin of every German irrespective of his remoteness or his nationality could not overnight endure such an arbitrary and weak barrier to its dreams.
Let us carve up the world and give Germany a share which the world and she will agree is her just due?
Germany already has given us her answer:
“Germany does not want a share of anything. She wants, she demands, all or nothing.”
Re-educate the younger generation?
Even were such a vast program put into operation it is highly doubtful whether it would be worth the effort, or achieve its objective. The soul is a greater and infinitely more powerful force than the brain. And the martial characteristics of the German are linked indelibly with his spirit and have become an integral part of his soul. Some day that war-soul would again come to dominate his brain.
A final solution: Let Germany be policed forever by an international armed force?
Even is such a huge undertaking were feasible life itself would not have it so. As war begets war, suppression begets rebellion. Undreamed horrors would unfold.
Thus we find that there is no middle course; no act of mediation, no compromise to be compounded, no political or economic sharing to be considered. There is, in fine, no other solution except one: That Germany must perish forever from this earth!
And, fortunately, as we shall now come to see, that is no longer impossible of accomplishment.
Chapter 7, Death to Germany:
There remains now but to determine the best way, the most practical and expeditious manner in which the ultimate penally must be levied upon the German nation. Quite naturally, massacre and wholesale execution must be ruled out. In addition to being impractical when applied to a population of some seventy million, such methods are inconsistent with the moral obligations and ethical practices of civilization. There remains then but one mode of ridding the world forces of Germanism — and that is to stem the source from which issue those war-lusted souls, by preventing the people of Germany from ever again reproducing their kind. This modern method, known to science as Eugenic Sterilization, is at once practical, humane and thorough. Sterilization has become a byword of science, as the best means of ridding the human race of its misfits: the degenerate, the insane, the hereditary criminal.[…]
The population of Germany, excluding conquered and annexed territories, is about 70,000,000, almost equally divided between male and female. To achieve the purpose of German extinction it would be necessary to only sterilize some 48,000,000 — a figure which excludes, because of their limited power to procreate, males over 60 years of age, and females over 45.
While Hitler’s distrust of the Jews clearly had a racist element to it, this alone was certainly not the motivating factor for wanting to rid Germany of the Jewish-Zionist-Communist threat. It is important to understand that Germany’s solution regarding the European Jews was hardly unique as the Jews had been expelled from approximately 67 countries prior to Hitler ever coming to power, including Austria, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Portugal, Prague, Russia, Spain, Switzerland and the Ukraine, sometimes more than once by a single country. Obviously there had to be reasons for the expulsion of the Jews from a laundry list of countries which contained a wide variety of people and political philosophies, however beyond simple antisemitism, few seem to seriously consider why no one wanted the Jews. As Ernst Zündel said, “There is no antisemitism without Semitism”.
The victimhood status of the Jews, of which the holocaust became an integral part, is an essential component of Zionist Jewry. Without it, the very foundation of Zionist philosophy collapses because the world would be far less tolerant of the tremendous political influence Jewry imposes outside the occupied state of Israel. Nor would the world be as tolerant of Israel’s genocide and mistreatment of the Arabs in Palestinian or elsewhere, which began shortly after the close of World War II and continues largely unabated to this day.
Contrary to what many believe, the victimization of the Jews, whether real or perceived, is not something that the Jewish-Zionist power-brokers find uncomfortable in the least; it is not only desirable, it is a crucial attribute which is leveraged in order to attain their geo-political goals. Although i cannot speak knowledgeably as to whether the Jewish people as a whole are aware of how this victimhood status is used to manipulate them and the impact it has in the political arena, there are certainly many Jews who are aware of and disagree with how the holocaust is used for political gain. In fact, many books which are highly critical of Zionism and the mainstream version of holocaust history and Germany’s role in World War II were written by Jews.
In 1916, during the First World War, the British were being pummeled by the German forces and defeat was imminent. The Zionists, who wanted to secure a homeland in Palestine but had no military or resources to do so, saw a golden opportunity and struck a deal with Britain; they would guarantee that the United States would come to their aid if Britain would promise a homeland for the Jews in Palestine after the war. This promise, commonly known as the Balfour Declaration of 1917, took the form of a simple personal letter from Arthur James Balfour, representing the Government of His Britannic Majesty King George the Fifth, to the powerful Jewish banker, Lord Rothschild:
Dear Lord Rothschild,
I have much pleasure in conveying to you on behalf of His Majesty’s Government the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations, which has been submitted to and approved by the Cabinet:
“His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.”
I should be grateful if you would bring this Declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.
Arthur James Balfour
With World War II and the expulsion of many Jews from Germany came another major opportunity for the Jewish Zionists to expand their interests in Palestine. There is no doubt that, were it not for Hitler and the Transfer Agreement, Israels progress would have been stunted. One of the remaining problems however was how to finance its development since Israel had no income from manufacturing or trade. The solution was to convince the world that the Jews had been victimized once again, this time by Hitler and the Nazis. This would secure the political support and monetary resources required to not only secure Israel as a state, but to later extort the vast sums of money necessary to maintain it. And so the holocaust and the myths of gas chambers and soap and lampshades were born and phrases like “the final solution to the Jewish question” were twisted to insinuate “extermination”. The suffering of the European Jews, both the factual and the fictional, would be used as collateral by the Zionists to ensure their geopolitical goals were attained for decades to come. Richard Harwood wrote in his book Did Six Million Really Die?:
It is very significant, however, that certain Jews were quick to interpret these policies of internal discrimination as equivalent to extermination itself. A 1936 anti-German propaganda book by Leon Feuchtwanger and others entitled Der Gelbe Fleck: Die Austrotung von 500,000 deutschen Juden (The Yellow Spot: The Extermination of 500,000 German Jews, Paris, 1936), presents a typical example. Despite its baselessness in fact, the annihilation of the Jews is discussed from the first pages – straightforward emigration being regarded as the physical “extermination” of German Jewry.
The following quote from the memoir of Jewish Rabbi Michael Dov Weissmandl clarifies how Jews holding key positions in Palestine had no intention of helping the European Jews migrate:
And you – our brothers in Palestine, in all the countries of freedom, and you, ministers of all the kingdom – how do you keep silent in the face of this great murder? Silent while thousand on thousands, reaching now to six million Jews, were murdered. And silent now while tens of thousands are still being murdered and waiting to be murdered? Their destroyed hearts cry to you for help as they bewail your cruelty. Brutal you are and murderers too you are, because of the cold-bloodedness of the silence in which you watch.
Because you sit with folded arms and you do nothing, though you could stop or delay the murder of Jews at this very hour. In the name of the blood of the thousands on thousands who have been murdered we beg, we plead, we cry out and demand that you take action, that you do deeds now – at once!
That the Ministers of Kingdoms and all the Lands raise a loud and piercing outcry that must enter the ears of the world, the ears of the German people, the ears of the Hungarian people. Let them cry out a warning to the German murderers. Let them proclaim that they know all that has been done in the past, and that which is still being done. And the Pope, himself, should join in this cry of outrage against the German murderers.
Let this outcry be heard over all the radios and read in all the newspapers of the world, that unless they stop at once the deportations of Hungary’s Jews – then will Germany be forever exiled from civilization.
We ask that the crematoria in Auschwitz be bombed from the air. They are sharply visible, as shown on the enclosed map.
Such bombing will delay the work of the German murderers.
What is more important – to bomb persistently all the roads leading from Eastern Hungary to Poland and to bomb persistently the bridges in the neighborhood of Karpatarus. Drop all other business to get this done. Remember that one day of your idleness kills twelve thousand souls.
You, our brothers, sons of Israel, are you insane? Don’t you know the Hell around us? For whom are you saving your money?
How is it that all our pleadings affect you less than the whimpering of a beggar standing in your doorway? Murderers! Madmen! Who is it that gives charity? You who toss a few pennies from your safe homes? Or we who give our blood in the depths of Hell?
There is only one thing that may be said in your exoneration – that you do not know the truth. This is possible. The villain does his job so shrewdly that only a few guess the truth. We have told you the truth several times. Is it possible that you believe our murderers more than you believe us? May God open your eyes and give you heart to rescue in these last hours the remainder.
Most important is that which I write about the bombing of the Auschwitz Crematoria and the bridges leading to them.
Such bombing can vitally delay the evil work of our slaughterers. And God who keeps alive the last remnant of Israel will show His mercy for which I pray. I pray as I write out of the sea of tears of the people of Israel. We wait God’s help.
One from the Market who witnesses the woes of his people
In response to the pleas of the Jewish Rescue Committee regarding the European Jews, Menachem Bader of the Jewish Agency, who had received numerous letters like the one above from Weissmandl, wrote the following:
We are writing to remind you of the one factor of which you must never lose sight: that ultimately, the Allies will win the war. After their victory, territorial boundaries will be reshaped as they were after the First World War. Then, the way will be clear for our purpose at this time, with the war drawing to a close, we must do everything in our power to change Eretz Yisrael to Medinat Yisrael and many steps have already been taken in this regard. Therefore, we must turn a deaf ear to the pleas and cries emanating from Eastern Europe. Remember this: all the allies have suffered many losses, and if we also do not offer human sacrifices, how can we gain the right to sit at the conference table when the territorial boundaries are reshaped? Accordingly, it is foolhardy and brazen for us to negotiate in terms of money or supplies in exchange for Jewish lives. How dare we ask of the allied powers to barter money for lives while they are sustaining heavy casualties daily? So, insofar as the masses are concerned: RAK B’DAM TIHJE LANU HAAREZ, [Eretz Yisroel will be ours only by paying with blood], but as far as our immediate circle is concerned, ATEM TAJLU [you escape]. The messenger bearing this letter will supply you with funds for this purpose.
The Zionist desire to see European Jews suffer more than necessary and to ensure that they were seen as victims in the eyes of the world is made crystal clear in this short but important quote from Rabbi Moshe Shonfeld, who wrote the following in response to the pleas of Rabbi Weissmandl:
When they asked me, couldn’t you give money out of the United Jewish Appeal funds for the rescue of Jews in Europe, I said, ‘NO!’ and I say again ‘NO!’ … one should resist this wave which pushes the Zionist activities to secondary importance.
After the Second World War it was the World Jewish Congress which helped setup the show trials at Nuremberg, further strengthening the Jewish-Zionist position by insuring that the world would hate the Germans and forever associate the Swastika, a symbol of anti-communism, with the murder of eleven million people, six million of which were Jews.
The desired victimhood status of Israel and the Jews continues to be maintained in the form of false-flag operations, where attacks upon Jewish people are committed by Jews and then blamed upon another party, most often for the purpose of some form of political gain. Jewish-Israeli-Mossad false-flag attacks are certainly not new to anyone who has studied Israel’s history even lightly, but these type of attacks also occur on a much smaller scale where individual Jews attack themselves and then point the finger elsewhere. Though these “attacks” may only involve a single “victim”, the disproportionate media attention they receive and resulting psychological impact upon the unwitting public can be quite significant. Following are a few examples of these types of false-flag attacks:
The Baltimore Sun, 9 October, 2008:
3 charged in Pikesville vandalism
A 19-year-old member of Baltimore Hebrew Congregation was being held yesterday after being charged in connection with the spray-painting of a swastika and the word “Nazis” at the synagogue in Pikesville.
Matthew Ian Saunders, whose family worships at the temple, and two other young Jewish men – Daniel Alexander Diaz, 19, and a 17-year-old who was not identified by police – were charged with two counts of destruction of property and damaging the property of a religious entity.
Haaretz, 1 September, 2013:
French Jews stunned by claims that rabbi faked own stabbing
The French Jewish community is in an uproar over allegations that Reform Rabbi Gabriel Farhi, who was stabbed on January 3, may in fact have faked the stabbing.
The allegations surfaced in a report this week by the weekly magazine Marianne, which was then picked up by Le Figaro. The journal reported that police officers investigating the stabbing said it is not clear whether Farhi was actually stabbed by an unknown assailant, and they are not ruling out the possibility that Farhi in fact stabbed himself.
The report stunned French Jewry, which for the past two years has been vociferously protesting law enforcement agencies’ failure to take effective action against the hundreds of anti-Semitic attacks the community has suffered.
BBC, 13 July, 2004:
‘Swastika attack’ woman detained
The 23-year-old woman said six men cut her clothes and drew swastikas on her body, assuming that she was Jewish.
Police say there are trying to clarify some inaccuracies in the account of the woman who has not been named.
According to French media reports – citing unnamed police sources – the woman subsequently admitted having made the story up.
The case has sparked widespread condemnation amid concern that racist and anti-Semitic attacks are on the rise in France.
Rense.com, 16 December, 2004:
Former Prof Gets Prison For Faking Anti-Semitic Hate Crime
LOS ANGELES — A former Claremont McKenna College visiting professor, who spray-painted her car with racist and anti-Semitic slurs and then reported a hate crime on campus, was sentenced today to a year in state prison.
Pomona Superior Court Judge Charles Horan said Kerri Dunn “terrorized” minority students at the college and turned the rest of the students into suspects, adding that her actions could have sparked major racial violence.
BBC, 30 August, 2004:
Jewish man held over Paris fire
Police in Paris have arrested a man in connection with a fire at a Jewish community centre that was initially assumed to be an anti-Semitic attack.
French media report that the suspect is a Jewish man who worked there.
The centre was daubed with swastikas and set alight a week ago, prompting renewed pledges by French authorities to defeat anti-Semitism and racism.
In July, a French woman falsely claimed she had been the victim of vicious anti-Semitic assault.
Of course the scale of these attacks is much larger when they are carried out by by Israel’s military or intelligence apparatus. Following are several examples of large scale false-flag attacks from the book, Final Judgment: The missing link in the JFK assassination conspiracy, by Michael Collins Piper:
THE U.S.S. LIBERTY – BLAMING THE EGYPTIANS
Israel, in fact, hoped to pin the responsibility on a “false flag” Egypt – and draw the United States into the impending 1967 war on the side of Israel. It is only because the Liberty did not sink and instead was rescued that the history books don’t tell us today that “the Arabs” sunk an American spy ship and sparked another “Lusitania incident” that forced America to go to war.
THE LAVON AFFAIR
Perhaps the best-known instance in which Israel used a “false flag” to cover its own trail was in the infamous Lavon Affair. It was in 1954 that several Israeli-orchestrated acts of terrorism against British targets in Egypt were carried out. Blame for the attacks was placed on the Muslim Brotherhood, which opposed the regime of Egyptian President Gamul Abdul-Nasser.
However, the truth about the wave of terror can now be found in a once-secret cable from Colonel Benjamin Givli, the head of Israel’s military intelligence, who outlined the intended purpose behind the wave of terror:[“Our goal] is to break the West’s confidence in the existing [Egyptian] regime . . . . The actions should cause arrests, demonstrations, and expressions of revenge. The Israeli origin should be totally covered while attention should be shifted to any other possible factor. The purpose is to prevent economic and military aid from the West to Egypt.”
Ultimately the truth about Israel’s involvement in the affair became public and Israel was rocked internally in the wake of the scandal. Competing political elements within Israel used the scandal as a bludgeon against their opponents. But the truth about Israel’s use of a “false flag” had come to international attention.
BLAMING ‘RIGHT-WING EXTREMISTS’
A shadowy “right wing” group known as “Direct Action” was accused of the attack on Goldenberg’s Deli in Paris on August 9, 1982. Six people died and 22 were injured.
The leader of “Direct Action” was one Jean-Marc Rouillan. It turned out that Rouillan had been operating in the Mediterranean under the cover name of “Sebas” and had been repeatedly linked to the Mossad. All references to Rouillan’s Mossad links were deleted from the official reports issued at the time.
However, the Algerian national news service-which has ties to French intelligence-blamed the Mossad for these activities. Angry French intelligence officers were believed to have leaked this information to the Algerians. Several top French security officials quit in protest over this intra-intelligence community scandal.
This is just one of many such Mossad-orchestrated crimes in which others took the blame. There are others.
On October 3, 1980 a synagogue on Copernicus Street was bombed in Paris. Four bystanders were killed. Nine were injured. The media frenzy which followed the incident was worldwide. Reports held that “right wing extremists” were responsible. Yet, of all of the “right wing extremists” held for questioning, none was arrested. In fact, all were released.
In the upper echelons of French intelligence, however, the finger of suspicion was pointed at the Mossad. According to one report: “On April 6, 1979, the same Mossad terror unit now suspected of the Copernicus carnage blew up the heavily guarded plant of CNIM industries at La Seyne-sur-Mer, near Toulon, in southeast France, where a consortium of French firms was building a nuclear reactor for Iraq.
“The Mossad salted the site of the CNIM bomb blast with ‘clues’ followed up with anonymous phone calls to police-suggesting that the sabotage was the work of a ‘conservative’ environmentalist group-‘the most pacific and harmless people on earth’ as one source put it.”
Other Mossad-orchestrated false flag operations also took place on French soil.
BLAMING THE CORSICAN MAFIA
On June 28, 1978, Israeli agents exploded a bomb under a small passenger car in the Rue Saint Anne, killing Mohammed Boudia, an organizer for the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). Immediately afterward, Paris police received anonymous phone calls accusing Boudia of involvement in narcotics deals and attributing his murder to the Corsican Mafia. A thorough investigation subsequently established that Mossad special-action agents were responsible for the terrorist killing.
BLAMING THE NEO-NAZIS
In October, 1976 the same Mossad unit kidnapped two West German students named Brigette Schulz and Thomas Reuter from their Paris hotel. Planted “clues” and anonymous phone calls made it appear that a Bavarian “neo-nazi” formation had executed the abduction. In fact, French intelligence established that the two German youths had been secretly flown to Israel, drugged, tortured, coerced into a false “confession of complicity” in PLO activities, and then anonymously incarcerated in one of the Israeli government’s notorious political prisons.
BLAMING THE SOUTH KOREANS
In February 1977 a German-born, naturalized U.S. citizen named William Jahnke arrived in Paris for some secretive business meetings. He soon vanished, leaving no trace. Paris police were anonymously informed that Jahnke had been involved in a high-level South Korean bribery affair and “eliminated” when the deal went sour.
A special team of investigators from SDECE, the leading French intelligence agency, eventually determined that Jahnke had been “terminated” by the Mossad, which suspected him of selling secret information to the Libyans. Along with other details of this sordid case, the SDECE learned that Jahnke had been “fingered” to the Mossad by his own former employer, the CIA.
BLAMING THE LIBYANS
One of Israel’s most outrageous “false flag” operations involved a wild propaganda story aimed at discrediting Libyan leader Muamar Qaddafi, one of Israel’s favorite enemies. In the early months of the administration of President Ronald Reagan, the American media began heavily promoting a story to the effect that a “Libyan hit squad” was in the United States for the express purpose of assassinating Reagan. This inflamed public sentiment against Libya and there were repeated calls for blood.
Suddenly, however, the “hit squad” stories vanished. In fact, it was ultimately discovered that the source of the story was one Manucher Ghorbanifar, a former Iranian SAVAK (secret police) agent with close ties to the Mossad. Even The Washington Post acknowledged that the CIA itself believed that Ghorbanifar was a liar who “had made up the hit-squad story in order to cause problems for one of Israel’s enemies.”
The Los Angeles Times itself had already blown the whistle on Israel’s scare stories. “Israeli intelligence, not the Reagan administration,” reported the Times, “was a major source of some of the most dramatic published reports about a Libyan assassination team allegedly sent to kill President Reagan and other top U.S. officials… Israel, which informed sources said has ‘wanted an excuse to go in and bash Libya for a longtime,’ may be trying to build American public support for a strike against [Qaddafi], these sources said.
In other words, Israel had been promoting the former SAVAK agent, Ghorbanifar, to official Washington as a reliable source. In fact, he was a Mossad disinformation operative waving a “false flag” to mislead America.
This was yet another Israeli scheme to blame Libya for its own misdeeds, this time using one “false flag” (Iran’s SAVAK) to lay the blame on another “false flag” (Libya). (In Chapter 18 we shall see yet another SAVAK crime carried out on behalf of Israel and its allies in the CIA.)
BLAMING LIBYA AGAIN
Israel’s Mossad was almost certainly responsible for the bombing of the La Belle discotheque in West Berlin on April 5, 1986. However, claims were made that there was “irrefutable” evidence that the Libyans were responsible. A U.S. serviceman was killed. President Ronald Reagan responded with an attack on Libya.
However, intelligence insiders believed that Israel’s Mossad had concocted the phony “evidence” to “prove” Libyan responsibility. West Berlin police director Manfred Ganschow, who took charge of the investigation, cleared the Libyans, saying, “This is a highly political case. Some of the evidence cited in Washington may not be evidence at all, merely assumptions supplied for political reasons.”
BLAMING THE SYRIANS
On April 18, 1986 one Nezar Hindawi, a 32 year old Jordanian was arrested in London after security guards found that one of the passengers boarding an Israeli plane bound for Jerusalem, Ann Murphy, 22, was carrying a square, flat sheet of plastic explosive in the double bottom of her carry-on bag. Miss Murphy told security men that the detonator (disguised as a calculator) had been given to her by her finance, Hindawi. He was charged with attempted sabotage and attempted murder.
Word was leaked that Hindawi had confessed and claimed that he had been hired by Gen. Mohammed Al-Khouli, the intelligence director of the Syrian air force. Also implicated were others including the Syrian Ambassador in London. The French authorities warned the British Prime Minister that there was more to the case than met the eye-that is, Israeli involvement. This was later confirmed in repeated reports in the Western press.
BLAMING THE PLO
In 1970, King Hussein of Jordan was provided with incriminating intelligence that suggested the Palestine Liberation Organization was plotting to murder him and seize power in his nation. Infuriated, Hussein mobilized his forces for what has become known as the ‘Black September’ purge of the PLO. Thousands of Palestinians living in Jordan were rounded up, some of the leaders were tortured, and in the end, masses of refugees were driven from Jordan to Lebanon.
New data, coming to light after the murder of two leading Mossad operatives in Larnaka, Cyprus suggested that the entire operation had been a Mossad covert action, led by one of its key operatives, Sylvia Roxburgh, who was also known as Sylvia Rafael and is believed to have been born Esther Paltzur.
Miss Roxburgh contrived an affair with King Hussein, known for his weakness for beautiful women, and served as the linchpin for one of the Mossad’s major “cover and deception” coups designed to destabilize the Arabs.
In 1982, just when the PLO had abandoned the use of terrorism, the Mossad spread disinformation about “terror attacks” on Israeli settlements along the northern border in order to justify a full-scale military invasion of Lebanon. Years later, even leading Israeli spokesmen, such as former Foreign Minister Abba Eban, admitted that the reports of “PLO terrorism” had been contrived by the Mossad.
THE ISRAELI DIPLOMAT
It is also worth noting that the attempted assassination-in London-of Israeli Ambassador to England, Shiomo Argov, was initially blamed upon the PLO. The attempted assassination was cited by Israel as one of its excuses for its bloody 1982 incursion into Lebanon.
Yet, ironically, the diplomat in question was considered one of Israel’s “doves” and inclined toward a friendly disposition of Israel’s longtime conflict with the PLO. He was the least likely target of PLO wrath. What’s more, one of the suspects in the crime was found carrying a “hit list” which actually included the name of the head of the PLO office in London.
In fact, it appears that the assassination attempt was carried out by the Mossad-under yet another “false flag”-for two purposes: (a) elimination of a domestic “peacenik” considered friendly toward the Palestinians; and (b) pinning yet another crime on the Palestine Liberation Organization.
There are probably hundreds more examples of Israeli false-flag and other criminal operations for anyone who cares to look. Any time the United States decides to overthrow the “brutal” government of another country which does not have a Rothschild controlled central bank, one can often safely assume Israeli-Jewish involvement, as was the case in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. Cuba, North Korea and Iran, as of January 2015, do not have Rothschild central banks and of course they all are given a prominent place on the U.S. government radar.
One of the most suppressed and documented facts of World War II was the utterly barbaric treatment which millions of German soldiers and civilians of all ages were subjected to by the United States, Britain, the Soviet Union and Czechoslovakia during and after the war. These wide-scale abuses consisted of torture, rape, enslavement and ethnic cleansing.
Little girls as young as six and grandmothers in their eighties were gang raped while family members were forced to watch. German civilians were rounded up and beaten or simply shot in the streets.
Eisenhower’s post-war death camps, unlike Hitler’s labor and transit camps, were nothing more than open-air gulags surrounded by barbed wire which were specifically designed to exterminate captured German soldiers through exposure and starvation. In order to accomplish this goal, Eisenhower circumvented the protections afforded to other prisoners of war by the Geneva Convention through the creation of an entirely new class of prisoners which was named ‘Disarmed Enemy Forces’. These camps offered no shelter, proper latrines, or other facilities for the German prisoners of war and food and water rations purposely limited to the point that starvation was inevitable. The whole program of the Rhineland camps was kept secret.
Among the early U.S captives was one Corporal Helmut Liebich, who had been working in an anti-aircraft experimental group at Peenemunde on the Baltic. Liebich was captured by the Americans on April 17, near Gotha in Central Germany. Forty-two years later, he recalled vividly that there were no tents in the Gotha camp, just barbed wire fences around a field soon churned to mud. The prisoners received a small ration of food on the first day but it was then cut in half. In order to get it, they were forced to run a gauntlet. Hunched ocer, they ran between lines of American guards who hit them with sticks as they scurried towards their food. On April 27, they were transferred to the U.S. camp at Heidesheim farther wet, where there was no food at all for days, then very little. Exposed, starved, and thirsty, the men started to die. Liebich saw between ten and thirty bodies a day being dragged out of his section, B, which at first held around 5,200 men.. He saw one prisoner beat another to death to get his piece of bread.