Dominatrix and Slave, Weimar Berlin, 1920's

Rescuing Israel: The Holocaust – The Motive

“Whilst large sections of the German nation are struggling for the preservation of their race, we Jews fill Germany with our vociferations. We supply the press with articles on the subject of its Christmas and Easter. We ridicule the highest ideals of the German nation and profane the matters which it holds sacred.” — Dr. Manfred Reifer, well known leader of the German Jews, Czernowitzer Allegemeine Zeitung magazine, Sep., 1933

The events leading up to World War II are widely misunderstood, as are the true intentions of Adolf Hitler. Germany had neither the military capacity nor the desire to dominate the world and this was clearly not a goal the German people aspired to. It has long bothered me that Adolf Hitler, a man who is relentlessly portrayed as the pinnacle of evil, could have been admired so enthusiastically by so many Germans. Were they all brainwashed, bloodthirsty barbarians? Gotz Aly, a liberal German historian, had this to say:

The Third Reich was not a dictatorship maintained by force. Indeed, the Nazi leadership developed an almost fearful preoccupation with the mood of the populace, which they monitored carefully, devoting considerable energy and resources toward fulfilling consumer desires, even to the detriment of the country’s rearmament program.

To put the level of Nazi state coercion of its citizens into perspective: Communist East Germany would later employ 190,000 official surveillance experts and an equal number of “unofficial collaborators” to watch over a populace of 17 million, while the Gestapo in 1937 had just over 7,000 employees, including bureaucrats and secretarial staff.

After World War I, the leaders of 32 states convened in Paris to craft the Treaty of Versailles, though the proceedings were dominated by the United States, Britain, France and Italy, Germany being excluded entirely. Key advisers and representatives consisted of many prominent Jewish businessmen and politicians including Louis Rothschild, Interior Minister of France and adviser to Georges Clemenceau, Philip Sassoon, adviser to British Prime Minister Lloyd George, and Bernard Baruch and Stephen Wise, both advisers to President Woodrow Wilson. U.S. banking interests were represented by Paul Warburg, chairman of the Federal Reserve, while his brother, Max Warburg, represented a German banking firm.

Given the cast of characters and the tensions between Germany and influential Jewry, it should not be difficult to understand the motives driving the Treaty of Versailles, which would ultimately cripple and loot Germany by virtually eliminating her military, destroying her economy and dividing up her land and foreign assets amongst the victors. Though ultimately not responsible for the First World War, it was decided that Germany would be held solely responsible and ordered to pay approximately 226 billion marks in compensation, equivalent to roughly $800 billion U.S. dollars in 2013, 16 billion of which was to be paid to governments and private banks in the United States, France and Britain. Although this figure was later reduced, it was not until 2010 that Germany would satisfy the debt. The German people are still paying off the debt for World War II, including reparations demanded by many thousands of alleged Jewish holocaust survivors as well as new debts which are constantly being invented.

After the First World War and prior to the National Socialist revolution, Germany was in shambles and spiraling rapidly out of control. The Bolsheviks were undermining the government from within and spreading communist propaganda through the media outlets under their control. In the education sector, approximately 59% of Jewish children enjoyed a secondary education as opposed to only 8% of German children. Unemployment, crime, drugs, homosexuality and pornography all contributed to the degradation of German culture and values. Berlin became known as the sex capital of Europe where virtually anything that one could imagine could be purchased.

Form an article in Veterans Today titled The Sexual Decadence of Weimar Germany, Lasha Darkmoon writes:

The biggest step in the direction of the decline of the German cultural life [however] was taken in the field of the light entertainment genre. Here—in the genre of musical comedy and above all in revue and burlesque—frivolity and lasciviousness were to rear their ugly heads. So much so that during these years Berlin was quite correctly considered the most immoral city in the world.

It was Jews who introduced this pornographic “art form” to Germany, a debased genre completely unknown before the Great War, and so it is the Jews who can be held responsible for the general decline in morals.

The Jewish sexologists Ivan Bloch and Magnus Hirschfeld became the representatives of “sex research” camouflaged as science—a bogus science that was merely an excuse for pornography and propaganda designed to destroy the institute of marriage and the sanctity of the family.

And again in a later article titled Secret Sex Life of the Jews, Darkmoon states:

Of one thing we can be reasonably certain: any society that attracts large numbers of Jews can expect within a few years to enter a spiral of decadence. Moral anarchy sets in. Sexual promiscuity throws open its Pandora’s box of evils. We saw it in Weimar Germany.

We see it gathering pace in America today. We see it above all in Israel, a society of fanatical settlers and rabid right-wing rabbis: a country surely doomed to implode from within, sooner or later, under the pressure of its own moral and military excesses.

I cannot help feeling that a great storm is brewing and that only a military coup or revolution can now save America. Save it from what? From the spiritual cancer that is consuming it from within, and from the iniquitous wars into which it is being lured — Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and soon perhaps Iran—on behalf of a foreign nation and its disinfo agents in America.

Unless a miracle soon occurs and some charismatic leader comes to our rescue, an unimaginably bleak future surely awaits us: a future in which the only consolations left to us will be mindless entertainment, drugs, alcohol, sexual intoxication — and suicide.

German woman burning money
Woman burning money to heat her home in 1920’s Germany (click to enlarge)

Because of the reparations Germany was forced to pay for World War I and the economic boycott imposed by world Jewry leading up to World War II, as well as other factors, the German economy was destroyed by the hyperinflation that resulted. By the end of 1923, the exchange rate between the Reichsmark and the dollar was approximately 4.2 trillion to 1. The rate of inflation was about 3,250,000% per month and prices for commodities was doubling every two days. A loaf of bread cost hundreds of billions of Reichsmarks and a kilogram of butter, thousands of billions. People were using wheelbarrows full of money to buy groceries. The currency became so worthless that it was used as wallpaper or to heat living spaces because it was cheaper to burn money than buy wood.

In his book Did Six Million Really Die?, Richard Harwood writes about the German policy toward the Jews prior to World War II:

Rightly or wrongly, the Germany of Adolf Hitler considered the Jews to be a disloyal and avaricious element within the national community, as well as a force of decadence in Germany’s cultural life. This was held to be particularly unhealthy since, during the Weimar period, the Jews had risen to a position of remarkable strength and influence in the nation, particularly in law, finance and the mass media, even though they constituted only 5 per cent of the population. The fact that Karl Marx was a Jew and that Jews such as Rosa Luxembourg and Karl Liebknecht were disproportionately prominent in the leadership of revolutionary movements in Germany, also tended to convince the Nazis of the powerful internationalist and Communist tendencies of the Jewish people themselves. It is no part of the discussion here to argue whether the German attitude to the Jews was right or not, or to judge whether its legislative measures against them were just or unjust. Our concern is simply with the fact that, believing of the Jews as they did, the Nazis’ solution to the problem was to deprive them of their influence within the nation by various legislative acts, and most important of all, to encourage their emigration from the country altogether. By 1939, the great majority of German Jews had emigrated, all of them with a sizable proportion of their assets. Never at any time had the Nazi leadership even contemplated a policy of genocide towards them.

In a speech given before the Reichstag on 30 Jan., 1937, regarding the Jewish/communist threat to Germany, Adolf Hitler stated, in part:

The second division has been brought about by the proclamation of the Bolshevik doctrine, an integral feature of which is that they do not confine it to one nation but try to impose it on all the nations.

Here it is not a question of a special form of national life in Russia but of the Bolshevik demand for a world revolution. If Mr. Eden does not look at Bolshevism as we look at it, that may have something to do with the position of Great Britain and also with some happenings that are unknown to us. But I believe that nobody will question the sincerity of our opinions on this matter, for they are not based merely on abstract theory. For Mr. Eden Bolshevism is perhaps a thing which has its seat in Moscow, but for us in Germany this Bolshevism is a pestilence against which we have had to struggle at the cost of much bloodshed. It is a pestilence which tried to turn our country into the same kind of desert as is now the case in Spain; for the habit of murdering hostages began here, in the form in which we now see it in Spain. National Socialism did not try to come to grips with Bolshevism in Russia, but the Jewish international Bolsheviks in Moscow have tried to introduce their system into Germany and are still trying to do so. Against this attempt we have waged a bitter struggle, not only in defense of our own civilization but in defense of European civilization as a whole.

Judea Declares War on Germany
Judea Declares War on Germany – March 24, 1933

Into the vacuum created by the gutting of Germany by the Treaty of Versailles after the First World War, stepped opportunistic Jewish bankers, businessmen and politicians who would ultimately hold the influential positions in Germany that Harwood speaks of. Meanwhile a toxic element of Jewry, which included the Jewish leaders Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht, worked on overthrowing the current regime in favor of a communist one. This was not popular among the German people, who resented the growing influence of this Jewish cabal and made their discontentment known at the voting booths. Because the stranglehold of Jewish hegemony upon the country was eventually broken, international Jewry would seek revenge by declaring war against Germany in the form of a world wide call to boycott German goods. The Jews had no country or army of their own and so their choices regarding revenge were initially limited, though their position would later be substantially improved through their political connections. This declaration of war appeared on the front page of the March 24, 1933, edition of the London Daily Express in an article titled, Judea Declares War On Germany: Jews Of All The World Unite in Action. It read, in part:

The Israelite people of the world declare an economic war on Germany. It is not sufficient that we should buy no goods made in Germany. We must refuse to deal with any shopkeeper who sells any German-made goods. What we are proposing is to bring the German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very existence depends.

Further declarations of war by Jewish power brokers would soon follow in publications around the world:

“The Israeli people around the world declare economic and financial war against Germany. Fourteen million Jews stand together as one man, to declare war against Germany. The Jewish wholesaler will forsake his firm, the banker his stock exchange, the merchant his commerce and the pauper his pitiful shed in order to join together in a holy war against Hitler’s people.” — Daily Express, March 24, 1933.

“For months now the struggle against Germany is waged by each Jewish community, at each conference, in all our syndicates, and by each Jew all over the world. There is reason to believe that our part in this struggle has general value. We will trigger a spiritual and material war of all the world against Germany’s ambitions to become once again a great nation, to recover lost territories and colonies. But our Jewish interests demand the complete destruction of Germany. Collectively and individually, the German nation is a threat to us Jews.” — Vladimir Jabotinsky (founder of the Jewish terrorist group, Irgun Zvai Leumi) in Mascha Rjetsch, January, 1934

“Hitler will have no war (does not want war), but we will force it on him, not this year, but soon.” — Emil Ludwig Cohn in Les Annales, June, 1934

“The war now proposed is for the purpose of establishing Jewish hegemony throughout the world.” – Brigadier General George Van Horn Mosely, The New York Tribune, March 29, 1939.

On 1 Apr., 1933, eight days after Jewry’s original declaration of war upon Germany, Hitler responded in the form of an order to boycott Jewish businesses for a period of 24 hours. Because international Jewry had declared war upon Germany, it appears that the Jews residing within her boarders could be legally treated as an enemy of Germany, disarmed and subjected to internment, though this would not occur for another few years. Hitler did not disarm all Germans as many falsely believe. Harwood writes:

GERMAN POLICY TOWARD THE JEWS AFTER THE OUTBREAK OF WAR

With the coming of the war, the situation regarding the Jews altered drastically. It is not widely known that world Jewry declared itself to be a belligerent party in the Second World War, and there was therefore ample basis under international law for the Germans to intern the Jewish population as a hostile force. On September 5, 1939 Chaim Weizmann, the principle Zionist leader, had declared war against Germany on behalf of the world’s Jews, stating that “the Jews stand by Great Britain and will fight on the side of the democracies… The Jewish Agency is ready to enter into immediate arrangements for utilizing Jewish manpower, technical ability, resources etc … ” (Jewish Chronicle, September 8, 1939).

DETENTION OF ENEMY ALIENS

All Jews had thus been declared agents willing to prosecute a war against the German Reich, and as a consequence, Himmler and Heydrich were eventually to begin the policy of internment. It is worth noting that the United States and Canada had already interned all Japanese aliens and citizens of Japanese descent in detention camps before the Germans applied the same security measures against the Jews of Europe. Moreover, there had been no such evidence or declaration of disloyalty by these Japanese Americans as had been given by Weizmann. The British, too, during the Boer War, interned all the women and children of the population, and thousands had died as a result, yet in no sense could the British be charged with wanting to exterminate the Boers. The detention of Jews in the occupied territories of Europe served two essential purposes from the German viewpoint. The first was to prevent unrest and subversion; Himmler had informed Mussolini on October 11th, 1942, that German policy towards the Jews had altered during wartime entirely for reasons of military security. He complained that thousands of Jews in the occupied regions were conducting partisan warfare, sabotage and espionage, a view confirmed by official Soviet information given to Raymond Arthur Davis that no less than 35,000 European Jews were waging partisan war under Tito in Yugoslavia. As a result, Jews were to be transported to restricted areas and detention camps, both in Germany, and especially after March 1942, in the Government- General of Poland. […]

Paul Rassinier, a prisoner at the Buchenwald and Dora concentration camps from 1943 until the end of the war, wrote:

Then one day I realized that a false picture of the German camps had been created and that the problem of the concentration camps was a universal one, not just one that could be disposed of by placing it on the doorstep of the National Socialists. The deportees — many of whom were Communists — had been largely responsible for leading international political thinking to such an erroneous conclusion. I suddenly felt that by remaining silent I was an accomplice to a dangerous influence.

Germany’s persecution of the Jews was not a result of pure antisemitism as we are led to believe. There were many legitimate reasons why Hitler chose a similar course regarding the Jews as did approximately 80 countries before him. The parasitic nature of the Jews created Hitler, a man who loved his country so much that he could not bare to stand idly by while Germany was destroyed from within by “the chosen people” who intentionally set out to molest German culture and dominate and corrupt its institutions for their own benefit.

Index | Previous: The Man | Next: The Victim | Last: Reader Comments